Analysis Of Financial Health and Prospect and Improvement On Financial Position

Authors Avatar

RFAB                Analysis of Telekom Malaysia Berhad

REPORT

To:     Whom it may concern

From: Financial Analyst

Date:  22 April 2002

Re:     Analysis Of Financial Health and Prospect and Improvement On Financial

           Position

PURPOSE

        The main purpose of this report is to analyse the financial health and prospect of Telekom Malaysia Berhad (TM). Accompanying this report will be the recommended accounting treatments that will help to improve the financial position of TM.

        Basically, this report can be broken down into the following respective sections:

  1. Assessment of Management Team
  2.  Financial Analysis
  3. Current Market Outlook
  4. Non-Financial Analysis
  5. SWOT Analysis
  6. Stakeholders Assessment
  7. Recommendation of Accounting Treatment
  8. Conclusion

(1) ASSESSMENT OF MANAGEMENT TEAM

Under this section, we’ll analyse the background of the board of directors of MASB, which will be as follows:

(I) Dato’ Ir. Muhammad Radzi bin Haji Mansor

        Aged 60, Dato’ Ir. Muhammad Radzi was appointed as the Chairman and director of Telekom Malaysia on 12 July 1999. He graduated with a Diploma in Electrical Engineering in 1962 from Faraday House Engineering College, London and a Masters in Science (Technological Economics) from the University of Stirling, Scotland in 1975.

        He is a member of the Board of Engineers, Malaysia, The Council of Engineering Institutions, United Kingdom, the Institution of Engineers, Malaysia, the Institution of Electrical Engineers, UK, and the Institute of Management, UK. He served in various engineering and management capacities in the former Telecommunications Department over a twenty-one year period.  

        In July 1996, he was retained as a Consultant/Advisor on various flagship application projects for the Multimedia Development Corporation, an agency established by the Malaysian Government to oversee the development and implementation of multimedia projects within the Multimedia Super Corridor (MSC).

(II) Dato’ Dr. Md Khir bin Abdul Rahman

        Dato’ Dr. Md Khir was appointed as Chief Executive TM and a board of member on 1 May 2001. Prior to this, he was Deputy Chief Executive/General Manager of Malaysia Electronics Payment System (MEPS).

        He started his career at the Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute (MARDI) in 1972 before joining Bank Negara Malaysia in 1983. He served the Central Bank in various senior positions before joining the telecommunications sector in 1996 as the Managing Director of Mejati Technologies Group.

        He holds a Bachelor of Science Degree in Mathematics from University of Malaya, Masters in Agricultural Development and Doctorate of Science in Computing Statistics, both from the State University of Ghent, Belgium.

(III) Dato’ Dr. Abdul Rahim bin Haji Daud

        Dato’ Dr. Abdul Rahim has held the position as Executive Director since July 1998. He holds a Bachelor of Engineering in Electronics, M. Sc in Telecommunications Engineering, a PhD in Engineering from the UK and a Masters in Business Administration from the United States. He is a Fellow of the Institute of Engineers, Malaysia.

        He joined Jabatan Telekom Malaysia (JTM) as a Telecommunications Engineer in 1973. In 1988, he was appointed General Manager, Information Systems and became the Senior General Manager, National Network Operations in 1993. In July 1995, he was made Senior Vice President, Network Services before his appointment to head TM TelCo  as its Chief Operating Officer in 1996. Upon his appointment as Executive Director in July 1998, he remained as the Chief Operating Officer TelCo until 1 February 2001 when he assumed the position of Executive Director, Corporate Strategy and Development.

Quality of The Team

        

From the information of the backgrounds as well as the vast experience of the Management of TM, we can say that TM does possess a management team, which has the ability in terms of education and knowledge, as we can see that the directors do hold the necessary qualification in respect the positions they held on the board.

Besides, the directors do also have a vast experience in order to carry out duties as we can see that each individual director has served in variety of positions both in public or private sectors before their appointments to their respective positions on the Board Of Directors.

(2) FINANNCIAL ANALYSIS

(I) Profitability

Operating Profit Margin (OPM)

        Telekom Malaysia saw a slight increase in the OPM, i.e. by 0.4 % in 2000. One of the main reasons is due to the increase in subscribers for fixed line and ISDN as well as data services and internet services.

           The income from non-telecommunications services such as education services also help to contribute in the increase of the operating income.

        However, the increment of operating costs 32.1%, mainly due to higher manpower retirement benefit costs, domestic and international out-payments, and write-off of investments and trade receivables owing by subsidiary companies have impaired the increment in operating income.

Net Profit Margin (NPM)

        The NPM saw a moderate increment of 2.57% in 2000 from 1999. The main reason is due to the disposal of an associated company in 2000 by TM. Therefore, this has contributed to the better performance in NPM.

(II) Liquidity

Current Ratio (CR)

        The CR saw an improvement from 0.92 to 1.26 in 2000. One of the possible reasons could be due to the sharp increment of the trade and other receivables, i.e. 36% from 1999. Another reason could be due to the significant improvement in the group’s cash flows, which has seen an increment of 114%. This could be attributed to the issue of ordinary shares as well as the disposal of an associated company in the year 2000.

Join now!

Quick Ratio (QR)

        The QR also saw a similar increase in percentage in 2000 from 1999, i.e. from 0.88 to 1.23. The possible reasons could be attributed to the significant increment in trade and other receivables as well as significant improvement in cash flows of the group.

(III) Use of Asset

Fixed Asset Turnover (FAT)

        The FAT saw a slight improvement of 0.41 times in 1999 to 0.47 times in 2000. The slight improvement could be attributed to the higher depreciation charges for the fixed assets as well as the losses being written-off for the ...

This is a preview of the whole essay