Theories that account for how learners acquire new skills or behaviours, and why they do so.

Authors Avatar
Introduction: The Theories

Before a comparison of the three theories could be done, it is necessary to summarise the key features of the three theories. Skinner, whose work was inspired by earlier behaviourists such as Thorndike, studied the effects of follow-up stimuli on the learning by animals. His observations of how follow-up stimuli either reinforce or suppress behaviour (i.e. provoke a certain response) had inspired him to come up with operant conditioning, which states that behaviour can be learnt by modulating the stimuli that follow the display of certain behaviours. Piaget, through his natural observation on children, postulates that learning occurs in stages and is also stage-dependent. According to Piagetian theory, learners have existing schemata or mental representations of knowledge and new information must either be assimilated or accommodated into the schemata. Disequilibrium occurs when a learner experiences a conflict between his observations and his existing schema. Equilibration between assimilation and accommodation must then occur for knowledge to be acquired meaningfully. Bandura, on the other hand, studied how children's aggression was affected after watching videos in which aggressive behaviour was rewarded or punished. His observational learning theory highlights the importance of vicarious learning or modelling, i.e. learning via observing the experiences of others. The learner's expectation of how well he would do, i.e. his self-efficacy would also determine how well he would perform.

Comparison and Contrast

Other than the difference in key concepts as highlighted above, one sees various contrasts among the three theories. Firstly, the three theories differ in their investigative methods. Skinner used animals in his study while Piaget and Bandura studied children. Skinner's "animal box" would have allowed him more control over the experiments and hence the results were more accurate and useful. However, the results of Skinner's study might not be totally valid when generalised to human learners. In contrast, Piaget and Bandura studied children, thus their results could be more representative of what truly occurs in the process of learning.

A less trivial comparison would entail analysing how the theorists perceive human learners. In Skinner's theory, human beings are passive agents and respond to stimuli in a mechanistic manner. This is different from the other two theories, which perceive learners as active agents interacting with the world. However, even the two differ in their specific views of the human being. The Piagetian view of the human being is that of a biological organism, and learning ability develops in stages, just like physical changes in the human body. In contrast, in Bandura's theory, the human being is seen as part of a social group, learning from observations of others, and more importantly from their judgement of how well they would perform based on others' experience. Likewise, their behaviours will also influence other learners who observe them.

Bandura's view of human learners is similar to that of Skinner in that learning is not limited to the individual, but depends on the environment. In Skinner's case, conditioning, i.e. adjusting stimuli (reinforcement or punishment) after certain behaviours helps to ensure the learning or extinction of such behaviours, while in Bandura's case, modelling of behaviours needs not be just via direct conditioning, but can also occur through vicarious reinforcement or punishment. In both cases, the environment plays a very important role in learning. This similarity is not surprising because Bandura's theory was built on the notion of operant conditioning. However, Skinner ignores the role of internal processes in learning, unlike Bandura, who takes into account learners' mental processing of observations. The learner must analyse the possible outcomes of a particular behaviour, or evaluate his own chances of success before he displays that trait. Whether a learner displays a "learned' behaviour depends on a cognitive processing of his observations of others or his beliefs of his chances of success, and not on a purely mechanistic reaction as in Skinner's theory. This importance of cognitive processes in learning is also prevalent in Piagetian theory, which states that children are motivated to learn by their own innate drive to discover reality. However, it does not mean that the environment does not play a role in learning according to Piaget. A rich, stimulating environment must be present to support the cognitive development of learners, so that they are constantly bombarded with new information to assimilate or accommodate into their existing schemata, so as to expand their knowledge base. In short, on the nature-nurture divide, Skinner's theory focuses more on the role of the environment (which provides stimuli to encourage or suppress responses), Piaget's theory emphasises the role of cognitive development while Bandura's theory is a balance of the two.
Join now!


Skinner's theory sees learning as a continuous process, with quantitative increases in learner behaviours with age. Learner behaviour can also be modified gradually by modulating the degree and frequency of reinforcement. Bandura's theory also portrays learning as a continuous process where perception, attention, memory and problem-solving skills increase with age. In contrast, cognitive development occurs discontinuously according to Piaget's theory. Piaget identifies four developmental stages of learning, namely sensorimotor, preoperational, concrete operational and formal operational stages. These developmental stages are loosely associated with age, but the progression through the stages is better tracked by the achievement of a ...

This is a preview of the whole essay