• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Did Britain become a Classless Society after 1945?

Extracts from this document...


Did Britain become a Classless Society after 1945? Matthew Woodward - The Road from 1945: Britain since the Second World War Social class in Britain played a key factor in determining a citizen's wealth, political power, education opportunities and more generally a person's lifestyle. The Cambridge International Dictionary of English defines class as "a group of people within society who have the same economical and social position" whilst Karl Marx argued that class was an 'economic category'1. Towards the end of the Second World War it was becoming increasingly suggestive that the British social classes were beginning to merge together in order to form what for former Prime Minister Harold Wilson once described as a 'classless' society. Social classes in Britain are traced back as far as the Industrial Revolution, seeing that it provided different parts of the country with various speeds of progress. The struggle of the working class and the dominance of capitalism highlighted class importance all throughout the nineteenth and most of the twentieth century. Since 1945, political events, traditions, national characteristics and consequences of the war all had an impact on the forms of class. Social analyst Michael Young argued that 'the lower classes no longer have a distinctive ideology with the ethos of society'2 suggesting that there was no reason for the British working class to exist. ...read more.


hand, historians such as Peter Hennessy debated that the Second World War "accelerated and extended [...] so many other areas of national life"9, complimenting Ross McKibbin's studies which suggested that the working class had experienced a positive outcome from the war, as it boosted 'social esteem and political power' along with 'a mild redistribution of income due to the abolition of large scale unemployment'10. The British working class achieved better living standards, notably as the average weekly wage rose from �6 eight shillings in 1950 to �11 two shillings in 1959.11 This provided larger consumer opportunity, which arguably widened the working class as they started to indulge in the widespread luxury of booming consumerism. British Historian Jony Judt explained that with rising real wages, working class families could survive on the income of the primary wage earner, whereas if both parents worked, the family could taste the lavishness the affluent society. This increase in disposable income meant that many working class families could afford commodities such as cars and washing machines, which previously could only be afforded by the middle and upper classes. This is argued by Andrew Marr as he states "as they acquired their new cars and explored their new supermarkets [...] a new country was breaking through - brightly coloured, fashionable, less masculine."12 Thus showing the working class's centrifugal movement towards the ...read more.


On the surface, class was perceived as irrelevant and outdated as modern generations enjoyed the same education, opportunities, popular culture and leisure time which suggests that distinctions of the old social classes disappeared. However, this was not the case as we still define ourselves by our origins, as seen is 'Britain Today' (2007) where bank managers, traditionally a position of the middle classes, defined themselves as working class - showing that social mobility had increased opportunities although this did not affect the way define ourselves, this can be seen as Cannadine argued that "it is widely believed, both in Britain and abroad, that the British are obsessed with class in a way that other nations are obsessed with food or race or sex or drugs or alcohol."17 Overall this indicates that Britain never was a classless society, despite social reforms that blurred the lines of distinction between the social classes and on the surface erased divisions within society. Below the surface people still defined themselves by their upbringing the social class of their parents, making it obvious that Britain remained a social divided nation, although this is seen as the younger generations as irrelevant. But this does not mean that they are any less important. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree 1950-1999 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

This essay is a good attempt to answer the question and provides a reasonable argument and evidence to support it. It would be improved by exploring the definitions of class more closely, specifically whether it was economic, social or cultural, and whether this changed over time. This would give a more nuanced argument.

4 stars.

Marked by teacher Rachel Smith 29/05/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree 1950-1999 essays

  1. What are the major factors that led to the end of the cold war?

    up with the USA is a major factor in the USA becoming a hegemon, and the ending of the Cold War. The USSR's centralised, command economy was geared on producing military equipment, paid for by the sale of oil. This led to long standing systemic problems in the economy that

  2. The Mexican Revolution of 1910 and The Cuban Revolution of 1959

    In 1956, Castro and other revolutionaries sailed from Mexico aboard the yacht Granma. The revolutionaries landed in Cuba through a shipwreck. Batista's soldiers killed most of these guerrillas, causing the remainder to flee to the Sierra Maestra Mountains of eastern Cuba.

  1. To what extent were ideological differences the cause of the Cold War from 1941 ...

    Factories closed down from the lack of product demand and unemployment figures soared. Both the USSR and the USA were under intense pressure, leaving them all the more susceptible to the other's probably more appealing ideology. The people of Russia were becoming tired of communism and the people of America

  2. How did Margaret Thatcher transform Britain?

    concern for the right of parents to choose for their children the kind of school and teaching they, not the educational establishment, thought best.'6 Thatcher also believed that the system of appointing intellects gave no encouragement to universities to uphold quality values, and thus saw away with 'academic tenure' within the Education Act.

  1. Why was Khrushchev removed from power in 1964?

    Khrushchev had to turn the ships back. This humiliated and embarrassed Soviet Russia. This was a massive flaw for Russia. It was a very important factor for the downfall of Khrushchev. Secondly, the Sino-Soviet split. In the early 1960's, there was an obvious rift between the Soviet Union and Communist China.

  2. How and why did America's role in the world change in the 20th century?

    America's role in the world again came under fire with the events leading up to the First World War. The rising tensions in Europe caused America to assert its position of neutrality towards international affairs. The announcement of Germany's plans for unrestricted war fare jeopardised America's trade with Allied countries.

  1. Explain the success and failures of Mao in China

    Mao then called upon the youth to restore China, which involved rebelling against non-communist behaviour of the elders. And on the 16th July 1966 Mao who was aged 72 along with many other young people saw down the River Yangzi, this got a lot of press coverage and signalled Mao return to power.

  2. Research Proposal When Mao died his only legacy was the political and economic devastation ...

    It has been stated that when Mao died after his 30-year reign, his only legacy was the political and economic devastation of China. In my research I will attempt to explain why the policies of Mao propelled China into a regressed state rather than a progressive one.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work