• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Did the acquisition of Portugal in 1580 represent a greater success for Philip II than the victory at Lepanto in 1571?

Extracts from this document...


Did the acquisition of Portugal in 1580 represent a greater success for Philip II than the victory at Lepanto in 1571? To judge whether the acquisition of Portugal represented a greater success for Philip II than the victory at Lepanto, the benefits and drawbacks of these two events must be compared. Their impact on the defence of Spain and Catholicism, Spanish finances, and Philip's reputation, must be considered. In 1580 Spain invaded and annexed its smaller neighbour Portugal, whose king had died without naming a successor. It can be argued that this acquisition was 'the greatest triumph of [Philip's] reign' 1. For Philip the annexation meant the unification of the Iberian peninsula under his rule, the acquisition of the sizeable Portuguese navy, and the wealth of Portugal and her New World territories. However, the acquisition did not bring Philip glory in the way that the 'spectacular victory of the Christian forces' 2 did at Lepanto in 1571, and although the Lepanto battle was costly, it helped protect Catholicism and Europe from the aggressive expansionism of the Turks. It can therefore be argued that the victory of Lepanto was more of an all-round success for Philip than the acquisition of Portugal. With respect to defending Spain and Catholicism, the victory at Lepanto appears more successful than the acquisition of Portugal. Elliott said that 'the danger in the Mediterranean receded after the victory at Lepanto' 3, a view supported by two paintings depicting the event: Titian's 'Spain Succouring Religion' 4 (1575) ...read more.


Therefore the defeat of the Turks at Lepanto, which marked the beginning of decline in Muslim threat to Catholic Europe, was a greater success for Philip in terms of protecting Spain and Catholicism than the annexation of Catholic Portugal, which on balance caused more defensive problems than it solved. However, in financial terms the acquisition of Portugal was certainly a greater success for Philip than the victory of Lepanto. McKinnon-Bell observes that 'the acquisition of Portugal brought [Philip] huge new sources of revenue' 22, something echoed in a despatch sent by the Venetian Ambassador on Philip's death in 1598, which described Philip's acquisition of 'the important kingdom of Portugal, with all its territories and treasure' 23. It is possible the Ambassador exaggerated the importance of the annexation out of respect for the recently deceased, but records of bullion import suggest that his assessment of the wealth of the Portuguese empire24 was accurate. Following the acquisition of Portugal, imports of treasure into Spain increased by 70% (from 20.7 million ducats between 1576 and 1580, to 35.2 million ducats in the five years following 158025). It seems then that the annexation of Portugal, which allowed Philip to exploit the Portuguese empire, was a triumph for Spanish finances. The victory of Lepanto, on the other hand, damaged Philip's treasury. Not only did Spain have to bear to the cost of building the 79 ships26 it contributed to the fight, it also did not gain anything financially from the victory, and there is evidence that Philip realised it would be detrimental to his finances. ...read more.


Even Elizabeth I of England (who was excommunicated from the Catholic Church in 1570 and therefore had no reason other than genuine admiration for Philip) sent congratulations after the victory44. The prestige Philip gained from the victory at Lepanto meant it was a greater success in this area than the acquisition of Portugal, which enhanced his standing in Europe only on paper. The victory of Lepanto represented a greater success than the acquisition of Portugal for Philip in terms of defence of Spain and Catholicism, as well as in glorifying himself and his empire. It reduced the immediate threat to Catholic Europe from the aggressive Ottoman empire, and was the beginning of the end of conflict between the Spanish and the Turks. The possession of Portugal, on the other hand, presented a range of new defensive difficulties: the Portuguese Atlantic coast was long and not easily protected from piratical raids, even with the addition of the Portuguese fleet. And while the victory at Lepanto gave Philip a popularity boost across Europe and helped portray Spain as a glorious empire, the acquisition of Portugal instilled fear in Spain's neighbours and did nothing positive for his reputation. It was only financially that the annexation of Portugal represented a greater success, because whilst the battle of Lepanto drained resources, the possession of Portugal brought Philip wealth from New World territories, as well as resources and revenue from Portugal herself. Comparing the two events therefore, the victory at Lepanto was a greater success for Philip than the acquisition of Portugal, because while Portugal benefited Spain financially, Lepanto improved Philip's standing in Europe, and helped ensure the safety of his people and his faith. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree 1500-1599 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree 1500-1599 essays

  1. How did the reign of Elizabeth transform the Tudor state?

    The queen issued a new currency that contained a standard amount of precious metal, which raised confidence in the currency. During Elizabeth's reign, England expanded overseas, private shipbuilding boomed, and the chief commodity was woollen cloth largely sold to Antwerp.

  2. How far was the church in need of reform during your chosen period of ...

    influence and power in Rome that only Henry could only dream of. Thus the Monarchs had managed to gain control over the Church, which became one of their main sources of income. It could be suggested that this was one of the political motives of Charles and Philip as the

  1. Is the English Civil War best described as a war of religion?

    The army was based on ability rather than nobility and gathered skilled fighters and fighters who wanted to fight. Religion was of the independent nature within the camp, different regiments could often be found to hold differing faiths, yet the Presbyterians and the Calvinists for example, would still fight together after praying separately.

  2. 'The divisions within Northern Ireland society have as much to do with class as ...

    In 1989, the Northern Ireland Office Minister Richard Needham said "If work can be found for 10,000 unemployed boys in West Belfast ...that in itself will do more to impact on the political and security areas than anything else." In all societies, political stability is linked to economic prosperity, and

  1. How far, and why, did traditional Catholicism decline during the reign of Elizabeth?

    It is from 1568 onwards that the Catholic decline halted, and the government was alerted to a potential threat. The lack of any conspiracies or disturbances during the majority of the 1560s demonstrated a decline in the Catholic faith

  2. Assess the impact of the opening of the Atlantic World in the 15th, 16th ...

    The history of the Atlantic world begins with the crossing by Christopher Columbus in 1492. When he died in 1509, four transatlantic voyages later, he still had not realized that his mission had failed. Columbus had sailed westward from Spain, hoping to find a faster route to southern and eastern Asia.

  1. Assess the view that the Dutch rebels challenged Philip IIs rule primarily in defense ...

    This would seem to be a reliable account, as Morillion, confidante to Cardinal Granvelle4 would have seen firsthand the reaction to the oppression Granvelle dealt out. Not only this, but an account of this nature could get Morillion into trouble as he could appear to be speaking negatively of both

  2. Why was Elizabeth so successful as a female ruler?

    wars like those which France suffered in the second half of the 16th Century"3 This therefore indicates a major success during Queen Elizabeth I's reign as her compromise between Roman Catholicism and Protestantism was very significant as it prevented a religious war breaking out in England like that in France

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work