• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Did the acquisition of Portugal in 1580 represent a greater success for Philip II than the victory at Lepanto in 1571?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Did the acquisition of Portugal in 1580 represent a greater success for Philip II than the victory at Lepanto in 1571? To judge whether the acquisition of Portugal represented a greater success for Philip II than the victory at Lepanto, the benefits and drawbacks of these two events must be compared. Their impact on the defence of Spain and Catholicism, Spanish finances, and Philip's reputation, must be considered. In 1580 Spain invaded and annexed its smaller neighbour Portugal, whose king had died without naming a successor. It can be argued that this acquisition was 'the greatest triumph of [Philip's] reign' 1. For Philip the annexation meant the unification of the Iberian peninsula under his rule, the acquisition of the sizeable Portuguese navy, and the wealth of Portugal and her New World territories. However, the acquisition did not bring Philip glory in the way that the 'spectacular victory of the Christian forces' 2 did at Lepanto in 1571, and although the Lepanto battle was costly, it helped protect Catholicism and Europe from the aggressive expansionism of the Turks. It can therefore be argued that the victory of Lepanto was more of an all-round success for Philip than the acquisition of Portugal. With respect to defending Spain and Catholicism, the victory at Lepanto appears more successful than the acquisition of Portugal. Elliott said that 'the danger in the Mediterranean receded after the victory at Lepanto' 3, a view supported by two paintings depicting the event: Titian's 'Spain Succouring Religion' 4 (1575) ...read more.

Middle

Therefore the defeat of the Turks at Lepanto, which marked the beginning of decline in Muslim threat to Catholic Europe, was a greater success for Philip in terms of protecting Spain and Catholicism than the annexation of Catholic Portugal, which on balance caused more defensive problems than it solved. However, in financial terms the acquisition of Portugal was certainly a greater success for Philip than the victory of Lepanto. McKinnon-Bell observes that 'the acquisition of Portugal brought [Philip] huge new sources of revenue' 22, something echoed in a despatch sent by the Venetian Ambassador on Philip's death in 1598, which described Philip's acquisition of 'the important kingdom of Portugal, with all its territories and treasure' 23. It is possible the Ambassador exaggerated the importance of the annexation out of respect for the recently deceased, but records of bullion import suggest that his assessment of the wealth of the Portuguese empire24 was accurate. Following the acquisition of Portugal, imports of treasure into Spain increased by 70% (from 20.7 million ducats between 1576 and 1580, to 35.2 million ducats in the five years following 158025). It seems then that the annexation of Portugal, which allowed Philip to exploit the Portuguese empire, was a triumph for Spanish finances. The victory of Lepanto, on the other hand, damaged Philip's treasury. Not only did Spain have to bear to the cost of building the 79 ships26 it contributed to the fight, it also did not gain anything financially from the victory, and there is evidence that Philip realised it would be detrimental to his finances. ...read more.

Conclusion

Even Elizabeth I of England (who was excommunicated from the Catholic Church in 1570 and therefore had no reason other than genuine admiration for Philip) sent congratulations after the victory44. The prestige Philip gained from the victory at Lepanto meant it was a greater success in this area than the acquisition of Portugal, which enhanced his standing in Europe only on paper. The victory of Lepanto represented a greater success than the acquisition of Portugal for Philip in terms of defence of Spain and Catholicism, as well as in glorifying himself and his empire. It reduced the immediate threat to Catholic Europe from the aggressive Ottoman empire, and was the beginning of the end of conflict between the Spanish and the Turks. The possession of Portugal, on the other hand, presented a range of new defensive difficulties: the Portuguese Atlantic coast was long and not easily protected from piratical raids, even with the addition of the Portuguese fleet. And while the victory at Lepanto gave Philip a popularity boost across Europe and helped portray Spain as a glorious empire, the acquisition of Portugal instilled fear in Spain's neighbours and did nothing positive for his reputation. It was only financially that the annexation of Portugal represented a greater success, because whilst the battle of Lepanto drained resources, the possession of Portugal brought Philip wealth from New World territories, as well as resources and revenue from Portugal herself. Comparing the two events therefore, the victory at Lepanto was a greater success for Philip than the acquisition of Portugal, because while Portugal benefited Spain financially, Lepanto improved Philip's standing in Europe, and helped ensure the safety of his people and his faith. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree 1500-1599 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree 1500-1599 essays

  1. Is the English Civil War best described as a war of religion?

    be the King of England and their fates would be cruel, whereas Cromwell asserted that Charles no longer deserved the kingship. It seems that Manchester's religious convictions were less strong than Cromwell's so far as to say that Manchester was grounded in tradition of Monarchy and order, yet Cromwell could

  2. The Authority Conflict: Machiavelli & Martin Luther

    George Bull uses the word 'prowess' to capture the concepts of potency, efficiency, and ability that Machiavelli attributed to the word. Virtue is generally employed in The Prince to mean an exceptional capacity for the kind of action that brings success in military and civic affairs, which will in turn allow the prince to maintain control.

  1. How far was the church in need of reform during your chosen period of ...

    For example the Archbishop of Toledo was chief prelate of Spain and the richest man in the country after the King. He was also richest ecclesiastic in the entire Church after the Pope. Spain was not in the same position as England in relation to the Roman Catholic Church in

  2. Assess the role and importance of Hernan Cortes in the Spanish conquest of Mexico.

    Behind their backs he set captured Aztec tribute collectors free so it would appear to Moteuczoma that Cortes and his men were allies. The long awaited Aztec attack still didn't come, again largely due to Cortes skill as a leader.

  1. Assess the impact of the opening of the Atlantic World in the 15th, 16th ...

    Moreover, they did not have to work especially hard to do this; conquerors completely subjugated huge Amerindian populations and forced them to labour for the benefit of people who lived across the ocean and whom they would never meet (The Encomienda system: An encomienda consisted of a grant by the

  2. Assess the view that the Dutch rebels challenged Philip IIs rule primarily in defense ...

    in the tax strike against the Tenth Penny tax despite Alva threatening 'to use troops to enforce collection'.5 The nobles reaction to this is clear from a document that William of Orange wrote to the states of Holland later in 1572; '..power and authority and prestige of the Estates may be restored to their former state.6'.

  1. Free essay

    What factors drew people away from the British Isles and towards the New World?

    The total shown as shipped by destination are 5053 to Virginia, 172 to Maryland and 161 to New England. Of the 10573 records of shipping, 2432 are shown as females, spinster or singlewoman and 7903 are shown as males.8 This proves that the ratio of men to woman relocating to

  2. Solving the Mystery of the Lost Colony.

    They had to keep the process of fortifying the soil and erecting structures in anticipation of the next ships. The third charter in 1587 of almost 120 people included 91 men, 17 women, and 9 children was said to be insured because unlike the missions before it, it included the whole family instead of just the men.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work