• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Historical Investigation -- How did the Southern States succession from the Union enable the 37th Congress to act more efficiently and disrupt the balance of powers?

Extracts from this document...


Section A: Plan of the investigation How did the Southern States succession from the Union enable the 37th Congress to act more efficiently and disrupt the balance of powers? When the southern states succeeded, their senators and representatives would have been recalled, leaving a smaller legislative branch that was of a more similar mind-set. This could have created a Senate and House of Representatives that was less divided and as such enabled them to pass legislature quickly and grant President Lincoln more power. This investigation will examine the number of senators and representatives before and after succession, the legislation passed in both of these time periods, and the actions taken by the President that would have had to be approved by Congress. This investigation will further analyze the book, Justice in Blue and Gray, and the historical minute essays produced by the US Senate for their origin, purpose, value and limitation to, in conclusion, determine whether the succession did make the 37th Congress more efficient while destroying the balance of powers. Section B: Summary of Evidence ? The Thirty-Seventh Congress had four sessions, one being an emergency session (July 4, 1861 to August 6, 1861) and another, a Special Session of the Senate (March 4 1861, to March 28 1861). 1 ? The House of Representatives of the 36th Congress had a total of 238 representatives and 5 delegates (delegates representing territories), with 116 being republicans and 83 democrats. ...read more.


but is his most specialized to a time period and country as he normally deals with international issues. As stated in the foreword, Neff wrote the novel to provide a systematic overview of law and judicial practices during the civil war, in a manner that would be accessible to non-lawyers. In this regard it has value by fully describing law terms that some authors would assume were understood. However, this does have the effect of possibly over simplifying events. As a non-American citizen and having an international law background, the work is less susceptible to bias from being a partisan to the North over the South and could provide a more neutral lens than an author raised in the U.S. Limitations wise, as Confederate documents were largely destroyed, the study was restricted to analyzing solely legal situations on the Union side. Also, in regards to the purpose of the book, it sough to explore the reasoning and issues of the U.S. judicial system at the time, rather than that of Congress. Following form, bias was present if only in the diction where Neff would describe something as "melancholy" or "obsessi[ve]." Yet, it was lessened due to the fact that while sounding favorable to the South's reasons for successions, he conceded that the compact theory is not a viable judicial stand point for the country. Another reference source was the U.S. Senate's Historical Minute Essays from 1851 to 1877. ...read more.


Yet, when passed into law by Congress, this effectively subjugated the judicial branch to the executive. As if, the two branches where ganging up on the third. It must be noted that while the South's succession did eliminate one of the largest political obstacles in Congress, the drastic measures and expediency which took place was also surely a result of the war time emergencies. In peaceful times, it would be nonsensical for the legislative branch to weaken their powers on the behalf of the executive if it was not for the sake of holding the country together. The plethora of laws passed during the emergency session as well, would have been influenced by the danger posed by the army of Northern Virginia to D.C. itself and the recent loss of Bull's Run. Section E: Conclusion In conclusion, the withdrawal of the South's representatives, while not uniform, did create a one-party like legislative branch much in the same manner as with a dictatorship, leading to increased efficiency yet also increased infringement of Constitutional rights. Something which resulted from the disturbance of the balance of power supported by the 37th Congress. However, it cannot be said that this was the only factor attributing to the quantity of laws drafted. The war time state expedited mainly those laws pertaining to the war, while the removal of the vast body of Democrats expedited those laws platformed by the remaining Congress. It was the combination of these factors that characterized the unusual efficiency and overall dynamic of this historic Congress. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree 1800-1899 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree 1800-1899 essays

  1. Benin art - what can it tell us about cross-cultural encounters?

    art changed from an extension of imperialism and 'primitive art' to 'world culture'. Benin art has also had an impact on the attitudes towards anthropology and ethnography. Anthropology is the study of humans and humanity in total, whereas ethnography is a branch of anthropology that provides scientific description of individual human societies.

  2. "Discuss the aims of the Congress of Vienna and the Consequences it had on ...

    The Tsar wanted to annex Poland to Russia and wanted access to reach the Mediterranean Sea in order to open up trade routes, by obtaining Turkish land. Russia did get Bessarabia in Turkey and also managed to obtain Finland. However, it did not get all of Poland, as Austria and Prussia had already claimed Polish land.

  1. Account for the union of Italy

    In 1820 there were revolutions in Naples and Piedmont, spearheaded by the Carbonari. After the removal of napoleon from Italy, the Vienna settlement felt that the peninsula could be an unstable region, one which could erupt as did the French in 1789.

  2. Causes of the civil war. The American civil war was a war that was ...

    This economic difference gave rise to a difference in the societal life of the two, in that the North became more culturally diverse with the coming together of people from all walks of life, and therefore had a more urban city life, while the South, due to the cotton plantation

  1. An In-depth comparison of two major Confederate Commanders: Robert. E. Lee and Braxton Bragg, ...

    Hooker then moved to implement his next tactic using the union forces at Fredericksburg. He planned a pincer attack of Lee's front and rear forces. This was where General Lee engaged his strategy. In the face of the approaching Hooker forces, Lee split his army into two.

  2. US History. The Womens Rights Movement Through the Civil War.

    a college degree, and the first woman to keep her last name after marriage.6 When Lucy stone and Henry Blackwell were married they joined hands and made a clear read aloud their true beliefs on marriage: While we acknowledge our mutual affection by publicly assuming the relationship of husband and wife...

  1. The hierarchical society that was present in the American South was deeply rooted in ...

    These guardians therefore prevented any autonomy that would be a threat to the hierarchy in which they lived. Religion had much in common with slave families, ?they were deeply religious?[6]. It was yet another example of the fragile autonomy slaves had.

  2. Total War is as much a myth as total victory or total defeat - ...

    as the style of Modern Warfare and gaing the upper hand in War due to resources and economic invest was quickly becoming the deciding factor in the outcome of War. Boemeke et al[11] (1999 p. 14) support that modern warfare required a change in how war operated drawing attention to

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work