• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is History a Nightmare

Extracts from this document...


'History' Stephen said, 'is a nightmare from which I am trying to awake' (James Joyce, Ulyssess). Is history a 'nightmare' and, if so, is it possible to awake? History has been represented by some as a triumphal march. As a progressive, unlinear, emancipating process. Fukyama, for instance, has heralded liberal democracy as the 'end of history'; while orthodox Marxism also posits a liberating 'end goal' in the form of 'communism'. History is understood as teleological and determined; a dream. It will be argued that history is more accurately understood as a 'nightmare'; as contingent and determined by conflict or struggle within specific networks of power-relations. In this respect, crude, reductive, teleological understandings of history are rejected, in favour of those that analyse history as based on contingent inter-relationships between structure, agency and discourse. Paradigms such as historical materialism, post-structuralism and critical-discourse analysis will be drawn on to show how relations of power and domination are constructed through conflict. It is these relationships which are the 'nightmare' of history; the nightmare of 'power' and the 'conflict' over it.1 Historical scholarship in historicising social relationships, de-naturalises relationships of power and showing the agency of historical actors can act as a critique to past and present 'nightmares'. For instance, feminist and Afro-Caribbean historians have often explicitly critiqued relations of domination so as to empower marginalised groups.2 'History', in this form, explicitly attempts to wake itself from the 'nightmare'. It should, however, also be recognised that the discipline of history has often been complicit in creating 'nightmares' of 'excluding' and 'marginalising' groups. It seems impossible to 'awake' from the 'nightmare' of history; conflict and power have been perennial. In this way the 'nightmare' might be a coma but it seems possible to make the bed more comfortable. History has long been dogged by a crude positivism. In this respect, history was given the status of 'science', as having an inevitable causality.3 Orthodox Marxism, for instance, notes 'humanity's increasing technological control over nature suggesting that this can be equated with historical stages. ...read more.


Fairclough, provide avenues in which 'agency', 'structure' and 'discourse' can be theorised.22 Recent research by Anna Kane on 'experience' of Irish peasants during the 'Land War' seems to draw on these paradigms, noting how construction of 'meaning' by reflexive agents leads to particular forms of 'social action'.23 Thus, the 'nightmare' of history has to be understood as occurring through inter-relationships between 'structure', 'discourse' and 'agency'; it is through the 'agency' of 'historical actors' that the potential to make the bed more comfortable lies. Thus, history can be understood as a 'dream', as conflict free, as harmonious, as inevitably drifting towards some political or economic 'end-point', such as 'communism' or 'liberal democracy'. However, this is to ignore the nature and dynamic of history. History is defined by 'conflict', by the construction of relationships of power and domination: this is the 'nightmare' of history. Historical paradigms that allow for the theorisation of conflict without teleology, reductionism or determinism have been drawn on. It seems that relationships of power are usefully understood as relationships between the 'structural', 'discursive' and 'agency' of actors. Any 'end-point' in history is rejected, in this sense, 'awaking' from history is not possible. The 'nightmare' of history shows that historical agents through struggle can adopt, entrench or resist relations of power. It is through the 'agency' of actors in mediating 'discursive' and 'structural' relations that the 'nightmare' of history continues. In this respect, pessimists might suggest that 'history' is more of a 'coma' than a 'nightmare'; but people in 'comas' are passive; history is about struggle. 1 Power is a vague concept and has been variously related to the 'state', 'productive forces', 'relations of production' and 'discourse'. It will be argued that 'power' has to be understood as an inter-relationship between 'structure' (relations of production) and 'discourse' mediated through the agency of historical actors. This approach is an approach advocated by political commentators associated with 'Critical Discourse Analysis'. ...read more.


Shohat, (ed) Dangerous liaisons : gender, nation, and postcolonial perspectives (Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press, c1997); C. Hall, Defining the Victorian nation : class, race, gender and the British Reform Act of 1867 (Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2000); R. R. Pierson and N. Chaudhuri - with the assistance of Beth McAuley - (ed). Nation, empire, colony : historicizing gender and race (Bloomington : Indiana University Press, c1998); Nira Yuval-Davis and Pnina Werbner, Women, citizenship and difference (London : Zed, 1999) 17 Enloe, in particular, notes how 'gender' is used to mobilize for military activity. C. Enloe, Bananas, beaches and bases: making feminist sense of international politics (London, Pandora, 1989): C. Enloe Maneuvers : the international politics of militarizing women's lives (Berkeley, CA : University of California Press, 2000); 18 Nancy Fraser, Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory (Minneapolis, 1989) 17-34. See also Lynn Hunt, 'Foucault's Subject in the History of Sexuality' in D. Stanton (ed)., Discourses of sexuality: from Aristotle to AIDS (Ann Arbor, Michigan U.P., 1992) pp. 78-93. 19 M.Bakhtin, ( translated by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist.) The dialogic imagination : four essays (Austin : University of Texas Press, 1981) 293-4 20 A. Clark, The Struggle for the Breeches: Gender and the making of the English Working Class, (London, Rivers Oram Press, 1995). Sonya Rose et al., 'Dialogue; women's history/gender history: is Feminist history losing its critical edge? Journal of Women's history,5/1 (1993) p. 108. 21 Smith Rosenberg, Disorderly Conduct: Visions of Gender in Victorian America (Oxford, 1985) p. 43-44; 22 Critical Discourse Analysis is an eclectic movement but has the general goal of investigating critically social inequality as it is expressed, signalled, constituted, legitimized and so on by language use. Good introductions are R. Wodak and Michael Meyer, Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (2001); J. Joseph and J.M. Roberts (eds) Realism, Discourse and Deconstruction (Routledge, London, 2004); Norman, Fairclough, Analysing Discourse; L. Chouliaraki and N. Fairclough, Discourse in Late Modernity 23 A. Kane, Reconstructing Culture in Historical Explanation: Narratives as Cultural Structure and Practice, History and Theory, Vol. 39, No. 3 (Oct., 2000) 311-330 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree 2000-2099 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

5 star(s)

This essay is very well written, erudite and confident. The student makes a number of good arguments and uses material well.
5 stars.

Marked by teacher Rachel Smith 24/12/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree 2000-2099 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Is History a Science

    4 star(s)

    And thus educate the public about the past. The most basic definition of history might cease at this point - simply the collection and summary of events, which happened in the past. The task of the historian however, is far more extensive and complicated than that of merely reporting the contents of historical facts and reports.

  2. To what extent were ethnic tensions the primary cause of the Rwandan genocide?

    themselves actually bought into this explanation.4 Although there is a possibility that this could be an accurate account of history, the exact origins of these three groups is unknown. In fact Hutus and Tutsis could very well belong to the same ethnicity.5 Melvern recounts their history in terms of social standing, in particular of political influence.

  1. The Nuclear Arms race between the USA and the USSR

    Certainly, Stalin made it a point to develop Soviet nuclear weapons as fast as possible - after Hiroshima, he ordered his security chief Beria to "Provide us with atomic weapons in the shortest possible time".2 For the preservation of its superpower status vis-�-vis the US, the Soviet Union had to

  2. History Extension Major Work Postmodernism . It is the feature of postmodernism and ...

    and the values and ideals of the previous movement. Postmodernism is a societal paradigm shift which took place after the Second World War. Postmodernism affects all forms of modern day life ranging from the arts and literature to being an influence on how we interpret events that take place in our lives. Postmodernism is the attitude of the day.

  1. What did the Cronulla riot of December 2005 and its aftermath reveal about Australian ...

    Well I'll tell you what kind of grubs this lot were. His lot were Middle Eastern grubs. And we're not allowed to say that, but I'm saying it. 5 Jones continued to his attack on the middle eastern community of Sydney by stating "we don't have Anglo-Saxon kids out there raping women in Western Sydney"6.

  2. Politics is power - the Iraq inquiry. A good example of power within ...

    As it was during this time that Tony Blair decided to go against the UN to support George Bush. The main focus however revolves around the intelligence which was available surrounding possible weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and the decisions made based on this, including 'events at the UN

  1. Why, if at all, is History important to society?

    This knowledge of the past, that the human race endeavours to discover, Carr argues ?is the key to understanding the present? therefore history will always be seen as important as it helps us see how things came to be Marwick argues ?Knowledge...is vital to the existence of contemporary societies, and

  2. What does the celebration of heroes reveal about attitudes to the past?

    Neolithic man took great solace from their hero worship, from their ancestral landscapes (Pryor 2003). The fact that hero celebration has existed for as long as humans have farmed shows the great universality of hero celebration, it is not limited to culture nor historical period but an integral feature of the psyche.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work