• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What impact did the Scandinavian settlement have on pre-Conquest society and economy in England?

Extracts from this document...


What impact did the Scandinavian settlement have on pre-Conquest society and economy in England? There is no doubt that the Scandinavian settlement of England had a massive effect on pre-Conquest society and the economy in England. The Scandinavians were a minority invasion force, there was always go to remain a vast majority of Anglo-Saxons remaining in the country, even so the Scandinavians did change society and the economy. In fact without the Scandinavian invasion and subsequent settlement, then it is possible that they would not have been an 'England' so to speak of by 1066 and the Norman invasion. In fact there might not even have been an invasion at all. It was the consequences of the Scandinavian settlement which would lead to the rise of England and then with the problems during the mid-eleventh century regarding the succession of the crown led to the Conquest. It was the invasion and settlement of the 'Vikings' within Mercia, Northumbria and East Anglia that had led to Wessex under King Alfred and his descendents to expand and take back the settled land and make the entity we now know as England. Wessex was the figure-head of an 'all-English unity'.1 The Scandinavian settlement was not just a single event. There was continuous trade and a constant influx of people, mainly mercenary troops, from Scandinavia.2 The 'Vikings' seriously affected the economy in both parts of the country, by depleting it in the English Wessex and stimulating it in the Danelaw- the term 'Danelaw' was not even used until 1008 ...read more.


This meant as a result that Alfred made two key reforming policies, the educational programme and the burghal system. The Scandinavians had been seen as a punishment from God on an unworthy people and so Alfred tried to change this with the educational programme whilst setting out a defence against the threat with the burghal system.18 However the Danelaw became a society which had been radically transformed into one of a more multi-cultural society.19 In the Danelaw, the Vikings integrated well into society, so much so that they effectively 'disappeared' and yet, in places like the Isle of Man they kept themselves and their culture, distinctively separate from the native inhabitants.20 Therefore it can be argued that the place was mightily important as to prove whether integration could occur. It is possible that the inhabitants of the Isle of Man were treated differently by having too strange a culture compared to the English, equally valid is that it was most probably the Norwegian conquerors who inhabited the island as they did the west of England whereas it was the Danes who took control of the East and the central proportions of England. One of the major ways in which the settlement can be proved is the language and within this is the naming of places. These could be either names ending in '-by' or '-thorpe', for example 'Oadby' or 'Scunthorpe', which were both Scandinavian words or equally a place name could change to become a Grimston hybrid, with the ending of the name remaining but the beginning being changed to one of a Scandinavian origin. ...read more.


The economy of England by the Conquest had stabilised although there could have been improvement, trade was flourishing however. The new disruption of land was new especially with it being sold on. The Scandinavians definitely brought about a new way of life in some respects with their settlement. However they did farm in the same way and so they did not in that respect bring about anything new. The settlers changed the ethnic situations and the 'political pattern of the natural society' rather than anything substantially physical, barring possibly the economy in terms of the money from it.32 The 'Vikings were not beyond the pale of civilised life'; they were able to show many values and practises to their neighbours.33 For the vast majority of peasant farmers the Scandinavian settlement probably meant little more than a change in whom it was that they paid their taxes to.34 Also it was the political conquests as much as the scale of the settlement that determined the Scandinavian impact.35 It was within the second quarter of the tenth century that it could be seen within the Danelaw that there was a well-established Anglo-Scandinavian society which provided the English with peace for several decades. This was only broken when more invaders came for extorting tribute in the late tenth century.36 Overall the Scandinavian settlement did have some huge impacts on the society and economy and helped to form the country before and even after the Conquest of England. After all, the Normans were originally of Scandinavian origin themselves. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Medieval History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Medieval History essays

  1. historical review of Else Roesdahl's The Vikings

    Even down to our knowledge of dress during the period, where she draws our attention to fragments of "kraftan-like jackets of fine wool and linen, fastened with buttons or crossed over and worn with magnificent belts"8, which were found in rich graves in Birka.

  2. How did the martyr's body become an emblem of triumph for early Christian communities

    was equated with denial and deprivation8' The Christianity set a tradition where abstinence from food, sex and physical pleasure in general was a necessary practice to achieve salvation and virtue. For the later Christians who practiced asceticism the martyr's body became a symbol of triumph as the martyr 'quite literally

  1. A Commentary on the Laws of King Alfred, 871-901 A.D.

    However there is always the issue of when manuscripts are copied there being clerical errors made by the monks and nuns as well as 'the translation of the Anglo-Saxon laws [having] its special difficulties'. Frequently they are short and sometimes cryptic in their meaning.

  2. How important were the political and economic factors in the Christianization of Vikings

    artefacts and slaves.9 The Scandinavian raiders and traders exploited their Christian neighbours throughout the Viking period.10 It is quite possible that this served as a political incentive for the eventual diplomatic conversions to Christianity of the Vikings as doing so may have restrained them from plundering from their Christian neighbours.

  1. What were the Reasons for the Successes Achieved by the First Crusade?

    Although it can be argued that many of the Muslim victories were due to unification of the Muslim world it was the adaptation of the Muslim tactics to deal with the Frankish cavalry charges which allowed them to achieve effective victories over the Franks.

  2. How seriously did people take claim that kings ruled with Gods blessing?

    the church?s monasteries and cathedrals became great powers of influence for the Catholic populace by commemorating past dead individuals as ?martyrs? and ?saints? who previously rebelled the king?s authority; which soon became places of pilgrimage. A good example is of Thomas Becket (c.1120-1170), who notably defied King Henry II of

  1. To what extent was the English Invasion of Irelandan accident, unforeseen and unplanned?

    was there to stay and to protect his kingship, perpetuating the notion that his motives were planned and foreseen. Therefore, Diarmait?s oath of fealty can only be seen in the light that he planned for an Anglo-Norman presence entering Ireland and that presence was to colonise the captured territory, harking

  2. The One Hundred Years War

    The defeat of the French at Agincourt in 1415 solidified his position? (Nosotro, 2005). The French lost to the English at Agincourt. It is believed that this loss was due to similar strategies that caused the French to also lose the battles of Poitiers and Crecy.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work