• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13

EU - problem question

Extracts from this document...


The European Union Law Assignment 17th December 2009 The problem question evidently concerns enforcement of community law, preliminary rulings and remedies. In order to effectively approach the question I will firstly outline the steps available to the Commission to enforce EU law, namely the procedure under Art 226 EC. Secondly I will examine how successful the Commission is likely to be, with regards to the remedies that are available to them, through an analysis of the relevant case law. Question 1 What steps can the Commission take in order to enforce EU Law? Are they likely to be successful, and if so, what remedies are available to them? The consistent application and thereby the effectiveness of EC law cannot be assured whilst lacking efficient enforcement mechanisms. In order to ensure that both Member States and EU institutions comply with their obligations under the Treaty, there are a number of approaches the Commission can adopt. We will focus on the "indirect" actions under Art 226 (EC), which concerns infringement proceedings:1 'If the Commission considers that a Member State has failed to fulfill an obligation under the Treaty, it shall deliver a reasoned opinion on the matter after giving the State concerned the opportunity to submit its observations. If the state concerned does not comply with the opinion within the period laid down by the Commission, the latter may bring the matter before the Court of Justice.' Essentially, if a given Member State does not comply with a particular requirement under the Treaty, it will be given the opportunity to explain its failure to comply, before the Commission delivers a "reasoned opinion". If the Member State persists in its failure to comply, the Commission can bring proceedings against the Member State in the ECJ.2 Along with the "indirect" actions the Commission ...read more.


For convenience, I will refer to such a court as the court of last resort. Where there is no right even to apply to the House of Lords for leave to appeal from a decision of the Court of Appeal - e.g. on a refusal by the Court of Appeal, on a renewed application, to grant leave to apply for judicial review - then the Court of Appeal will be the court of last resort. So Lord Denning MR stated the matter too widely in Bulmer v Bollinger" Given that leave to appeal to the High Court was refused it could be argued that the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal would come under Balcombe's LJ definition of a "court of last resort". This in turn demonstrates that the third paragraph of Art 234 does apply, and so the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal were not entitled to proceed without making a reference to the ECJ. On a related note, if Gerard were to apply for a preliminary reference now, it is submitted that he would be unlikely to be successful. This is because of the similar Italian case, which was decided recently, ruling that the Italian immigration law was incompatible with EU law. The ECJ sated in the case of Da costa10: "The authority of an interpretation already given by the Court may deprive the obligation [under Art 234(3)] of its purpose and thus empty it of its substance. Such is the case especially when the question is materially identical with a question which has already been the subject of a preliminary ruling in a similar case ". This was later approved by the ECJ in CILFIT 11: "National courts or tribunals are not obliged to refer to the Court of Justice a question concerning the interpretation of Community law raised before ...read more.


The applicants had sought an injunction, which would have had the effect of suspending the Act in question until an Art 234 reference could be made. This was difficult for the Lord given that there was no rule in the English public law that would allow this kind of interim relief, or that EU law could allow in a national court to suspend operation of a national law. It therefore made a reference to the ECJ posing this question. The ECJ reemphasised the supremacy of EU law through the principle of cooperation laid down in Art 10(EC), and that any provision of a national legal system, which might impair the effectiveness of community law, even temporarily are "incompatible with those requirements which are the very essence of EC law". Therefore the position of the ECJ with regards to interim relief was evident: "the full effectiveness of Community law would be just as much impaired if a rule of national law could prevent a court seized of a dispute governed by Community law from granting interim relief in order to ensure that full effectiveness of the judgment to be given on the existence o the rights claimed under Community law. It therefore follows that a court which in those circumstances would grant interim relief, if it were not for a rule of national law, is obliged to set aside that law". Applying Factortame to Gerard's circumstances, the ECJ's judgment should prove persuasive in granting Gerard interim relief pending the correct application of Art 39 (EC) on the free movement of workers, which would have the effect of suspending the 2007 Act requiring Gerard to register, meaning he would be entitled to remain in the UK, which is, in all the circumstances probably his most desired remedy. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree European Union Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree European Union Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    What is the meaning of the term 'measure equivalent to a quantitative restriction' for ...

    4 star(s)

    not really differentiate between domestic goods and imports, but they do in fact have the effect of creating some sort of inequality between the two. Article 3 outlines the intent of the Commission as regards the application of Article 28 in these matters.


    According to Article 23(1)(formerly 9(1)), the European Community shall be based upon a customs union. This union shall cover all trade in goods and shall involve the prohibition between Member States of customs duties on imports and exports and of all charges having equivalent effect.

  1. Critically discuss the proposition that the Treaty of Lisbon has completed the evolution of ...

    27 EULR 511 17. 1 S. Douglas-Scott; 'A tale of two Courts: Strasbourg, Luxembourg and the growing European human rights acquis' (2006) 43 Common Market Law Review 629 18. 1 Reflections on the Architecture of the EU after the Treaty of Lisbon: The European Judicial Approach to Fundamental Rights ELJ,Vol.

  2. Free movement of workers

    Mrs Levin as they held that 'whether or not a person was a worker was not a question a question of how much money they earned but whether or not it was 'genuine'.' Therefore using this test one can simply look at what David is doing, and assess whether it satisfies this test.

  1. EU institutions

    Indeed, the Council has a potential power "as the preserve of the member states and remains the most obviously intergovernmental body of the Community"3. Considering the powers of the Council, especially in the early years it seems that the Council has done almost everything, initiating, executing and vetoing legislation.

  2. The scenario presented involves an Irish national, Gerard, who had migrated to the UK ...

    The European Union (EU) is a confederation of states that acts as an organisation with "a complex and highly developed system of internal law, which has direct effect within the legal systems of its member states"1. Its law is supreme and prevails over all other national law and as stated in the European Communities Act 1972 s.2(1)

  1. 'The inauguration by the Court of Justice of the doctrines of direct effect and ...

    Moreover, third pillar framework decisions have lacked direct effect. Apart from the specific nature of third pillar acts (which are very complex acts bearing inter-governmental components as well as supranational elements) the main obstacles for the extension of supremacy to third pillar acts seem to derive from the 'conditional jurisdiction

  2. What barriers must be removed in the European Union to ensure the free movement ...

    Therefore large differences, between Member States, of income tax could result in interference within the 'free working' concept of the labour market. If a worker considers their earnings are taxed too much, this may prompt their decision to move to a country where income tax is at a more favourable level.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work