• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Can Law Be Regarded As Command Sanction Of The Sovereign? Austin's Theory.

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐SURVEY OF LEGAL ENVIRONMENT IN BUSINESS ASSIGNMENT ONE How Can Law Be Regarded As Command Sanction Of The Sovereign? Table of Contents 1. Introduction to Legal Positivism and Austin?s Model 3 2. Internal Aspect of Law 3 3. Hart?s Criticism of Austin?s Theory 3 4. Conclusion 3 5. References 3 1. Introduction to Legal Positivism and Austin?s Model Positivism stems from the Latin root ?positus? which means to firmly put in place the existence of something. Legal positivism is a thesis about the nature of law according to which: 1. All laws are laid down by a certain procedure or person. 2. Something only counts as a legitimate law once recognized by a particular procedure or person. In other words, the legitimacy of law solely depends on its sources rather than its merits (Lyons & Dworkin, 1977). This perspective was popular during the nineteenth century due to the command theories of law presented by Jeremy Bentham and John Austin. According to these theories, the law is the command of the sovereign, which is backed up by the threat of a sanction in the case of non-compliance. Law is the expression of a desire, (for example, ?I would like for you to file your returns by June 30th?) backed up by a form of punishment or force. ...read more.


What is not taken into consideration is the internal viewpoint, there is a person in that car that using the law to guide his or her actions. Since Austin did not consider the internal aspect of the law, one can reason that there are subjects that follow the law irrespective of sanctions. This is because internally, they have come to regard the law as necessary. The theory of command has been challenged because it presumes that sanctions are a necessary part of the law and are needed for the population to follow the law (Morris & Hart, 1962). However, Austin could argue that by including the internal aspect of law, one only brings the idea of morality to law which is otherwise best understood in value unbiased terms. Hart and Kelsen each gave different perspectives on the internal aspect of law. The concept was that legal theorists must understand law from an internal point of view, however, that point of view must not be so internal as to involve a moral aspect of the law. 3. Hart?s Criticism of Austin?s Theory Austin?s theory of command is an order backed up by a threat of punishment in the case of non-compliance. Nonetheless, not all laws fit this model. Austin?s model has a strong case in criminal law, however, what about other aspects of the law such as wills, contracts, and marriage? ...read more.


The sovereign cannot be a constructive metaphor since the command originates from him. Additionally, the emphasis on the term ?sovereign? makes it difficult to understand the continuity of legal systems. A new ruler will not come with the populations ?habit of obedience? that Austin deems essential for a system?s rule-maker. Some legal theorists defended Austin and argued that, by the term sovereign, Austin meant the office or institution which symbolizes supreme authority and not the individuals who happen to hold that office or hold that institution at any particular time (Woozley, Kelsen & Knight, 1968). 4. Conclusion The great strength regarding Austin?s definition of law lies with its simplicity. However, it is in this simplicity that the definition fails to capture aspects that we deem closely bound to the law. Various modern theorists believe that Austin?s definition of law captures the connection of law and power, and places the importance of that connection at the forefront of analysis. According to one supporter: ?Austin?s theory is not a theory of the Rule of Law: of government subject to law. It is a theory of the ?rule of men?: of government using law as an instrument of power. Such a view may be considered realistic or merely cynical. But it is, in its broad outlines, essentially coherent." (Cotterrell 2003: p. 70) When a situation requires a more realistic or critical approach to law, Austin?s definition of law and force is attractive (Brian, 2019). 5. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Jurisprudence section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Jurisprudence essays

  1. Of What Value is Gramsci's Concept of Hegemony to our Understanding of Law Today?

    For Gramsci, the establishment of a hegemonic worldview required the three-phased mechanism of universalism, naturalization, and rationalization. By universalism, the dominant group portrayed its narrow-minded interests and selfish obsessions as the common interests of all people (Mouffe, p168). On one level, the ruling group may try to bring dissenting or

  2. Is Dworkin a natural lawyer? Before examining the Dworkinian perspective, it is important to ...

    However is his supposed new school of thought any different from the natural law camp? Before discussing his developing idea, it is important to discuss why he finds the other schools of thought so inapplicable. Dworkin, third notion of jurisprudence, legal interpretivism purports to straddle ever so slightly in between the two main notions.

  1. Feminism in the UK. As feminists claim the personal is the political they ...

    the trap of wanting to look and feel just like celebrities who are only seen on screen when they look their best. This is a big concern for modern feminists as this issue that the majority of young girls experience and it is ruing the mind-set and stopping them from progressing as women (as feminists)41.

  2. Ronald Dworkin and his interpretation of natural law and positivism.

    However Dworkin states there is no way of explaining every such principle as many would not become apparent until a judge happens upon them in a hard case. Dworkin also fails to explain the legal nature of these principles, although he does state they are binding upon the decision maker.

  1. Discuss the following statement with reference to the jurisprudential theories of legal positivism, Dworkin(TM)s ...

    This theorist is focused on the rights of the individual (Rights 'as trumps').25 In the present case those concerned are the electricity board (who are under a statutory duty to maintain supplies of electricity in their district), the plaintiffs (who are entitled by statute to a continuous supply of electricity)

  2. Marriage in the 21 century

    These include the incestural relationships mentioned above. However, it could be argued that if the contemporary view of marriage is purely about the private love and romance involved in any given relationship then these types of relationships should be allowed and thus allowed to get married.

  1. Jurisprudence theory

    Legal positivism initially developed around the core idea that "law can be bad" undermining the naturalist theory of Lex iniusta non est lex4. Radbruch refers to this: Where there is not even an attempt at justice, where equality, the core of justice, is deliberately betrayed in the issuance of positive

  2. This essay will look at what is meant by the Common Sense of Law ...

    their sources claiming to reflect the will of God.[9] This is a good observation by the authors and it is difficult to disagree with them. These rules exist separately from the social situations they are called upon to resolve. Many of the social facts in a dispute become irrelevant because it is the law that determines what is at issue.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work