• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Can Law Be Regarded As Command Sanction Of The Sovereign? Austin's Theory.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐SURVEY OF LEGAL ENVIRONMENT IN BUSINESS ASSIGNMENT ONE How Can Law Be Regarded As Command Sanction Of The Sovereign? Table of Contents 1. Introduction to Legal Positivism and Austin?s Model 3 2. Internal Aspect of Law 3 3. Hart?s Criticism of Austin?s Theory 3 4. Conclusion 3 5. References 3 1. Introduction to Legal Positivism and Austin?s Model Positivism stems from the Latin root ?positus? which means to firmly put in place the existence of something. Legal positivism is a thesis about the nature of law according to which: 1. All laws are laid down by a certain procedure or person. 2. Something only counts as a legitimate law once recognized by a particular procedure or person. In other words, the legitimacy of law solely depends on its sources rather than its merits (Lyons & Dworkin, 1977). This perspective was popular during the nineteenth century due to the command theories of law presented by Jeremy Bentham and John Austin. According to these theories, the law is the command of the sovereign, which is backed up by the threat of a sanction in the case of non-compliance. Law is the expression of a desire, (for example, ?I would like for you to file your returns by June 30th?) backed up by a form of punishment or force. ...read more.

Middle

What is not taken into consideration is the internal viewpoint, there is a person in that car that using the law to guide his or her actions. Since Austin did not consider the internal aspect of the law, one can reason that there are subjects that follow the law irrespective of sanctions. This is because internally, they have come to regard the law as necessary. The theory of command has been challenged because it presumes that sanctions are a necessary part of the law and are needed for the population to follow the law (Morris & Hart, 1962). However, Austin could argue that by including the internal aspect of law, one only brings the idea of morality to law which is otherwise best understood in value unbiased terms. Hart and Kelsen each gave different perspectives on the internal aspect of law. The concept was that legal theorists must understand law from an internal point of view, however, that point of view must not be so internal as to involve a moral aspect of the law. 3. Hart?s Criticism of Austin?s Theory Austin?s theory of command is an order backed up by a threat of punishment in the case of non-compliance. Nonetheless, not all laws fit this model. Austin?s model has a strong case in criminal law, however, what about other aspects of the law such as wills, contracts, and marriage? ...read more.

Conclusion

The sovereign cannot be a constructive metaphor since the command originates from him. Additionally, the emphasis on the term ?sovereign? makes it difficult to understand the continuity of legal systems. A new ruler will not come with the populations ?habit of obedience? that Austin deems essential for a system?s rule-maker. Some legal theorists defended Austin and argued that, by the term sovereign, Austin meant the office or institution which symbolizes supreme authority and not the individuals who happen to hold that office or hold that institution at any particular time (Woozley, Kelsen & Knight, 1968). 4. Conclusion The great strength regarding Austin?s definition of law lies with its simplicity. However, it is in this simplicity that the definition fails to capture aspects that we deem closely bound to the law. Various modern theorists believe that Austin?s definition of law captures the connection of law and power, and places the importance of that connection at the forefront of analysis. According to one supporter: ?Austin?s theory is not a theory of the Rule of Law: of government subject to law. It is a theory of the ?rule of men?: of government using law as an instrument of power. Such a view may be considered realistic or merely cynical. But it is, in its broad outlines, essentially coherent." (Cotterrell 2003: p. 70) When a situation requires a more realistic or critical approach to law, Austin?s definition of law and force is attractive (Brian, 2019). 5. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Jurisprudence section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Jurisprudence essays

  1. Of What Value is Gramsci's Concept of Hegemony to our Understanding of Law Today?

    For Gramsci, the establishment of a hegemonic worldview required the three-phased mechanism of universalism, naturalization, and rationalization. By universalism, the dominant group portrayed its narrow-minded interests and selfish obsessions as the common interests of all people (Mouffe, p168). On one level, the ruling group may try to bring dissenting or

  2. Critically assess the notion; 'Privatising Prisons is 'Morally Wrong''

    23 Prison Statistics England and Wales 2000 (2001), London: HMSO. 24 Right from inhumane and degrading treatment. See also the Human Rights Act 1998. 25 Human Rights Act 1998 A Practical Guide, Rambert De Mello, 2000: Jordan Publishing Limited. 26 http://www.liberty-human-rights.org.uk.

  1. Artificial Intelligence & Law

    geology, scientific research, medicine, programming, game playing4) computer experts turned to the legal profession to test their new discovery. AI AND LAW The initial twenty five years were spent in developing Legal Knowledge Retrieval Systems [hereinafter "LKRS"], programs that stored vast amounts of legal data, (case reports, case laws, articles, statutes etc.)

  2. Copyright Law.

    For computer-generated work copyright expires 70 years after the work was made. In sound recordings and film copyright expires 50 years from the end of the calendar year that it was released or made if it is not released. The duration of copyright in broadcasts and cable programmes expires 50

  1. An Introduction to the Law of Intellectual Property

    (ii) of the Patents Act, 1987) in clear language and enough detail that an individual with an average understanding of the field could use or reproduce the invention. Such descriptions are usually accompanied by visual materials such as drawings, plans, or diagrams which give better description of the invention.

  2. The Law and the Internet: Surveillance Culture.

    A court order and the ISP's knowledge and assistance is required to install the system. Controversy surrounds the use of Carnivore because it can intercept and collect communications by people who have nothing to do with the FBI's investigation, for example, if the system is purposely or accidentally misconfigured, or

  1. What is the General Will in Rousseau's theory? Explain how a person can be ...

    Indeed, Rousseau seems to say that if he is coerced, then he ends up acting autonomously and be forced to obey it by the whole body politic. He then "tried to gain advantage of common good morality through reconciliation of wills and this is necessary to obligation" (Riley, 1982: 115).

  2. Company Law: A few ghostly relics of ultra vires continue to haunt us, but ...

    in the articles or memorandum, and the third party was relieved from any obligation to enquire into the capacity of the company. The Prentice report had recommended that companies should be allowed to dispense with objects clauses, however, the Companies Act 1989 did not abolish the need for an objects

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work