• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Property Law Essay. Victorian and ACT Human Rights Acts. The law of residential tenancies is wholly governed by the Residential Tenancies Act 1997 (thereafter RTA). Its jurisdiction lies primarily in the VCAT.

Extracts from this document...


INTRODUCTION One of Parliament's reasons for enacting the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities (thereafter 'Charter') was to better protect an individual's human rights.1 Its phrased implementation meant that while the rest of the Charter came into force on 1 January 2007, the obligations on public authorities and remedies afforded enters into force on 1 January 2008.2 The law of residential tenancies is wholly governed by the Residential Tenancies Act 1997 (thereafter 'RTA'). Its jurisdiction lies primarily in the VCAT.3 Given its functions,4 the VCAT is arguably a 'public authority'5 under the Charter.6 Since the Charter governs interactions between Government and individuals and not between individuals or organisations,7 this essay deals only with landlords exercising public functions8 like the Director of Housing in its provision of public residential leases. Given the sheer number of RTA provisions, this essay does not dwell into specific RTA provisions to avoid an arbitrary analysis, but identifies three main areas which the Charter may affect the RTA's general operation9 - an obligation to interpret RTA provisions compatibly with human rights,10 obligations on public authorities to act compatibly with or decide with consideration given to a human right11 subject to the test of limitation on a human right12 (thereafter 'proportionality test') and remedies afforded.13 In so doing, it not only analyses immediate practical consequences and policy implications for the law of residential tenancies but goes further by suggesting that ironically because of the Charter, these immediate effects may either dissipate or lead to practical problems over time. INTERPRETATIVE OBLIGATION [s 32(1)] South suggests that the Charter14 does not allow for the purpose of any legislation to be altered.15 He argues that since the statutory interpretation is a manifestation of its purpose, because the Charter expressly provides for a 'declaration of inconsistent interpretation'16 (thereafter 'Declaration') with human rights, it accounted for those purposes which are inconsistent with human rights and hence cannot have 'impliedly amended all earlier Victorian laws to include the purpose of protecting human rights'.17 This means that ...read more.


While there is no obligation on public authorities to provide tenancy under the Charter,41 if they deny individuals tenancy in contravention of a human right under the Charter,42 they will be acting unlawfully under s 38(1).43 Since the wide range of human rights protected under the Charter makes it difficult to deny an individual tenancy, the combined effect of s 38(1) and s 7(2) may unwittingly burden public authorities with the responsibility of providing sufficient residential tenancies over time. Arguably, this brings the scope of the RTA closer to that of the Housing Act 1983.44 RELIEF [s 33(1) & s 36(1)] AND REMEDIES [s 39(1)] Some argue that although the Charter's interpretative obligation and the obligation on public authorities have far-reaching effects on the RTA, the reliefs and remedies offered by the Charter are limited. As aforementioned, the relief for an inconsistent interpretation is a Declaration that neither affects the validity of the provision45 nor gives rise to any cause of action46 despite allowing for possible amendments to the RTA. Yet regardless of whether the RTA is amended, the mechanisms triggered by a Declaration not only keep its provisions under constant Parliamentary review, it indirectly keeps both Parliament and the RTA abreast the current tenancy situation in Victoria. Ironically, the ambiguous s 39(1) has the greatest effect on the RTA in terms of the remedies it affords. '(U)nlawfulness' in s 39(1) refers to any 'unlawfulness' arising under s 38(1).47 While a literal reading of s 39(1) suggests that no remedies will be available for breach of s 38(1) unless there exists a non-Charter action for remedies, Gans argues that s 39(1) confers a freestanding cause of action for one to seek remedies should a public authority's particular conduct breach s 38(1) so long as the remedy is available when that particular conduct is considered unlawful under the non-Charter legislation. The public authority's conduct need not be unlawful under the non-Charter legislation, nor need there be a non-Charter action before remedies may be sought for breach of s 38(1).48 This latter interpretation of s 39(1) ...read more.


May 18(2) Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal 101, 102. 26 Kurtzberg J and Henikoff J, 'Freeing the Parties From the Law: Designing an Interest and Rights Focused Model of Landlord Tenant Mediation' (1997) Journal of Dispute Resolution 53, 53. 27 Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (Vic) s 38(1). 28 Ibid. s 7(2). 29 Cosic v Director of Housing [2007] VSC (Unreported, Forrest J, 7 December 2007). 30 Ibid. [34] 31 Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (Vic) s 233(1)(a) - (c) 32 See Mirko Bagaric, 'Analysis of Limitation Clauses in the Victorian and ACT Human Rights Acts' (2007) 3(3) High Court Quarterly Review 116, 126. 33 Cosic v Director of Housing [2007] VSC (Unreported, Forrest J, 7 December 2007). [39] 34 Director of Housing v Andrew [2009] VSC (Unreported, Cavanough J, 2 October 2009). 35 Residential Tenancies Act 1997 (Vic) s 67. 36 Director of Housing v Andrew [2009] VSC (Unreported, Cavanough J, 2 October 2009) [42]. 37 Cosic v Director of Housing [2007] VSC (Unreported, Forrest J, 7 December 2007) [34]. 38 Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (Vic) s 20. 39 Ibid. s 17. 40 Denise Meyerson, 'Equality Guarantees and Distributive Inequity' (2008) March 19(1) Public Law Review 32, 46. 41 Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (Vic) s 20. 42 Ibid. pt 2. 43 Bagaric, above n 31, 38. 44 See Housing Act 1983 (Vic) s 6. 45 Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (Vic) s 36(5)(a). 46 Ibid. s 36(5)(b). 47 Explanatory Memorandum, Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (Vic), 28. 48 Jeremy Gans, 'The Charter's Irremediable Remedies Provision' (2009) 33(1) Melbourne University Law Review 105, 122 - 3. 49 Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (Vic) s 2(a). 50 Mirko Bagaric and Peter Faris, 'Charter of Human Rights: More Punch than Expected?' (2007) July 81(7) Law Institute Journal 64, 66. 51 Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (Vic) s 39(3). ?? ?? ?? ?? LAW 3401 Student ID: 21133905 Property A Optional Assignment Lecturer: Ms Jenny Schultz (Stream 3) 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Other Jurisdictions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Other Jurisdictions essays

  1. Legal education in India. Legal education and quality of law graduates have great ...

    of Columbia,' lamented on the state of the profession as under: "... In some jurisdictions up to half of the lawyers who appear in Court are so poorly trained that they are not properly performing their job and that their manners and their professional performance and their professional ethics offend a great many people.

  2. Anticipatory Bail under CRPC. A critical study of the recent amendments and judicial interpretation ...

    The Directors of MAPL moved the Supreme Court for an order against the High Court. The Supreme Court held that the mere fact that the bail applications of some of the appellants had been rejected is no ground for directing their immediate arrest.

  1. Elucidate Doctrine of Res Judicata in the Light of Decided Cases

    It is a settled law that in a Suit for injunction when title is in issue, for the purpose of granting injunction, the issue directly and substantially arises in that suit between the parties when the same is put in issue in a later suit based on title between the

  2. In his article, Du Plessis does a comparative review of the law of unjustified ...

    German law has discarded reference to subjective factors that cannot lay any clear claim to being of primary concern in awarding claims, in favour of broadly based defences By following this trend, the mixed systems may very well 191 The condictio sine causa specialis has traditionally stood in a vexed

  1. Land law. The purpose of this paper is to present an analytical and investigative ...

    He may use the resources and facilities, brought about by the setting up of the contract to make personal, undisclosed profits. In the end, long-term, the dishonesty or disloyalty by the breaching party may bring the contract to an end.

  2. Homicide - Maltese Law.

    is born and dies owing to injuries suffered prior to his birth. In such a case, the child would have acquistato il bene tutelato, la vita in senso proprio, as required by Manzini. At English law, [i]f the child is poisoned or injured in the womb, is born alive and

  1. Constitutional Equality in Singapore. The predominant purpose of unequal treatment under the Constitution ...

    The participative dimension: the PCMR and GRC scheme The PCMR and the GRC scheme are forms of unequal treatment geared towards achieving a participative dimension of substantive equality. (1) The PCMR As an extra-Parliamentary body, the PCMR may prevent bills containing a ?differentiating measure?[32] from being passed in Parliament.[33]

  2. Unilateral Divorce in Muslim Law

    The fact of the matter is that even some Ulemas and Khaliphas used this right with impunity. The provisions for dower, irrevocability of divorce, and restrictions on remarriage creased some semblance of regulation of this unilateral power of divorce, but that was all.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work