• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What are the advantages and disadvantages of a written constitution?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What are the advantages and disadvantages of a written constitution? A written constitution is precisely a charter that has been codified, in that the rules and regulations that citizens must abide by are stated in a single document format. Although elements of the British constitution are written, (eg the statute law), sections of it are not. It must be noted that America follow a written constitution called the "Bill of Rights", and by contrast Britain at present do not adhere to a formal written constitution. Hence, one must consider the advantages and disadvantages of a written constitution to establish a judgement on whether the introduction of a written constitution in Britain is a beneficial concept to acquire. There are many advantages of adopting a written constitution in Britain, and there are many pressure groups, political figures and ordinary people who believe that Britain should have one. Our unwritten constitution is old fashioned, and there is not even an agreement about what it actually contains as it is made up of various conventions, statute laws and ancient documents. Constitutions are supposed to be the fundamental social compacts by which authority and order are maintained, and so a British written constitution would not only provide a rigid means of protecting the people from the power of the executive, but prevent the power of the Government from being too centralised, which is presently a major criticism of the Government. ...read more.

Middle

An entrenched codified constitution would also be an advantage to the British Judicial system, as laws would be clearly defined so judges would be able to recognise when laws are broken, and make fairer decisions. Some people believe that even though our unwritten constitution is supposed to be traditional, the running of the country at present does not coincide with the laws that were made hundreds of years ago, as they are simply out of date and not applicable to today's society. A written document would not only modernise British law, but would also follow the majority of the countries in the world, who have working proof that written constitutions are beneficial and successful. Despite the large number of advantages for a written constitution to be incorporated into Britain, there are also many arguments against an entrenched document. Our present constitution may contain many sources, but there is no denying that our constitution does work; Britain has a successful judicial system and a democratic Parliament, and even though it may run in a different way than a country with a written constitution such as America, is certainly isn't less prosperous and flourishing than the US. Also, even though the introduction of a written constitution is possible, it would be extremely time consuming to produce and costly, especially to the British tax payers. ...read more.

Conclusion

Power and sovereignty would then travel from the elected executive to the un-elected judiciary and judges would be able to make political decisions such as make laws and declare unconstitutional actions, which is undemocratic and unjust. The final disadvantage of introducing a written constitution into Britain is that the supposed inflexible and rigid nature of written constitutions of other countries is often open to amendments when laws are out dated. Unless our constitution declared that the constitution could not be amended similar to in Italy, there is danger that laws may need to be changed and it would not be possible. If we adopted a written constitution and amended it whenever necessary, there would hardly be any difference to the present constitutional system. Overall, there are valid reasons for and against written constitutions, in that a written constitution would bring many economical, social and political benefits, and be a worthwhile move for the future of Britain, and will protect against arbitrary government. However by contrast there are also a great number of arguments against a written constitution, which would pose the country a lot of problems if Parliament decided to introduce one. A valid point is that there may not be many negative consequences of introducing a written constitution, but as the present one works efficiently, there is simply no necessity for one, in my belief. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Public Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Public Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The Constitution of United Kingdom In Comparison with the Constitution of Russia

    4 star(s)

    but only after consulting senior judges. Judges may not be MPs (Members of the House of Commons) and are expected to refrain from political activities . They are paid out of a special fund and thus not subject to financial pressure from politicians. Conventions prevent them from being individually criticized by MPs.

  2. Compare and contrast written and unwritten constitutions. Which type of constitution do you favour?

    This draws attention to the fact that Britain is marked by a formal concentration of authority rather than by the Separation of Powers in contrast to the USA. In Britain the emphasis has been on the concentration of authority in the hands of the government.

  1. Free essay

    The unwritten nature of the British Constitution is not simply an accidental failure to ...

    Its result being that legislation is easily pushed through the House by the executive, and the remaining safeguard which could block unsafe legislation has been rendered effectively useless. In his writings it is clear Lord Hailsham is concerned with the powers the government holds, especially minority governments.

  2. How valid are the arguments against Athenian democracy presented by the Old Oligarch?

    in Plato, where he talks of the process by which a democratic man grows into an oligarchic one, and vice versa24. Therefore, we can assume that the Old Oligarch's argument here is a common one amongst the well-to-do of Athenian society, due to the corroboration found in the works of Plato.

  1. 'The enactment of a codified constitution would transform the British system of government.' Discuss

    Regardless, enacting a codified constitution is unlikely to transform this aspect of the British constitution for two reasons. Firstly, Parliament can already bind its successors and some legislation has already been entrenched. Secondly, the Diceyan doctrine has been weakened ever since the enactment of the European Communities Act 1972, and has suffered further blows from both devolution and the HRA.

  2. Research Proposal - British Constitution - Whether it is possible to claim that UK ...

    What is the nature of the British constitution? Research Purpose This research was carried out in order to: - Find out if the United Kingdom has a constitution. - Understand the nature of the British constitution - Classify the main sources of the British constitution - Identify the recent developments in UK's constitution.

  1. Non-fulfillment of tax obligation by taxpayers

    For instance: * [E]vasion from registration with the tax authority (including non-residents and except for commercial resident organizations): If such activity is carried out within thirty days - Fiftyfold the rate of the minimum wage but not less than 10 % of the income (profit)

  2. The Constitution And an Element of Change.

    The act had allowed for two parliaments to be set up. One house would govern the 6 northeast counties, which were mainly Unionist and the other the rest of the island. It was the first mention of the controversial area of partition.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work