• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What are the advantages and disadvantages of a written constitution?

Extracts from this document...


What are the advantages and disadvantages of a written constitution? A written constitution is precisely a charter that has been codified, in that the rules and regulations that citizens must abide by are stated in a single document format. Although elements of the British constitution are written, (eg the statute law), sections of it are not. It must be noted that America follow a written constitution called the "Bill of Rights", and by contrast Britain at present do not adhere to a formal written constitution. Hence, one must consider the advantages and disadvantages of a written constitution to establish a judgement on whether the introduction of a written constitution in Britain is a beneficial concept to acquire. There are many advantages of adopting a written constitution in Britain, and there are many pressure groups, political figures and ordinary people who believe that Britain should have one. Our unwritten constitution is old fashioned, and there is not even an agreement about what it actually contains as it is made up of various conventions, statute laws and ancient documents. Constitutions are supposed to be the fundamental social compacts by which authority and order are maintained, and so a British written constitution would not only provide a rigid means of protecting the people from the power of the executive, but prevent the power of the Government from being too centralised, which is presently a major criticism of the Government. ...read more.


An entrenched codified constitution would also be an advantage to the British Judicial system, as laws would be clearly defined so judges would be able to recognise when laws are broken, and make fairer decisions. Some people believe that even though our unwritten constitution is supposed to be traditional, the running of the country at present does not coincide with the laws that were made hundreds of years ago, as they are simply out of date and not applicable to today's society. A written document would not only modernise British law, but would also follow the majority of the countries in the world, who have working proof that written constitutions are beneficial and successful. Despite the large number of advantages for a written constitution to be incorporated into Britain, there are also many arguments against an entrenched document. Our present constitution may contain many sources, but there is no denying that our constitution does work; Britain has a successful judicial system and a democratic Parliament, and even though it may run in a different way than a country with a written constitution such as America, is certainly isn't less prosperous and flourishing than the US. Also, even though the introduction of a written constitution is possible, it would be extremely time consuming to produce and costly, especially to the British tax payers. ...read more.


Power and sovereignty would then travel from the elected executive to the un-elected judiciary and judges would be able to make political decisions such as make laws and declare unconstitutional actions, which is undemocratic and unjust. The final disadvantage of introducing a written constitution into Britain is that the supposed inflexible and rigid nature of written constitutions of other countries is often open to amendments when laws are out dated. Unless our constitution declared that the constitution could not be amended similar to in Italy, there is danger that laws may need to be changed and it would not be possible. If we adopted a written constitution and amended it whenever necessary, there would hardly be any difference to the present constitutional system. Overall, there are valid reasons for and against written constitutions, in that a written constitution would bring many economical, social and political benefits, and be a worthwhile move for the future of Britain, and will protect against arbitrary government. However by contrast there are also a great number of arguments against a written constitution, which would pose the country a lot of problems if Parliament decided to introduce one. A valid point is that there may not be many negative consequences of introducing a written constitution, but as the present one works efficiently, there is simply no necessity for one, in my belief. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Public Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Public Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The Constitution of United Kingdom In Comparison with the Constitution of Russia

    4 star(s)

    On the matters of joint jurisdiction, legislative and other regulations of sub units of the Russian Federation are subordinate to federal regulation. Local rules which fail to comply with federal statute are not enforceable . Conclusion It can therefore be concluded that the foreign Russian constitution of law has been

  2. What is the argument for and against a written constitution for the UK? ...

    A future Tory Westminster will then be in conflict with Labour Edinburgh. Further leverage has been taken with the Greater London Authority Act of 1999. Edinburgh, Cardiff and London are now all influencing peoples daily life. Political careers can now start from these places.

  1. Research Proposal - British Constitution - Whether it is possible to claim that UK ...

    There are many reasons as to why the UK does not have a codified/written constitution. The main reason is that the UK has been stable for too long, there have been no major events which could cause an upheaval in UK.

  2. 'The enactment of a codified constitution would transform the British system of government.' Discuss

    judge, those lawyers involved in party politics must sever links with the party that he or she had formerly supported. Although constitutional conventions encompass a huge range of subject matter, they do share some similar characteristics,34 such as vagueness and informality.

  1. Free essay

    The unwritten nature of the British Constitution is not simply an accidental failure to ...

    Indeed this is justified as the majority have consented to be ruled by whoever is in power, and so must abide by his arrangements. Indeed Parliament have tremendous power to construct laws on any matter it likes and can even change basic laws that in countries which have written constitutions, would be much more difficult to change.

  2. Compare and contrast written and unwritten constitutions. Which type of constitution do you favour?

    This may ensure protection, but by making the laws harder to change or repeal may incur rigidity which can lead to obsolete laws. An example of this is the process of amending the American constitution.

  1. Features of a constitution whether written or unwritten, and whether underlying values are better ...

    It is vital that a responsible governing power honours and protects civil liberties if it wants to maintain a democratic legitimacy, if it does not it could risk damaging the foundation of its governing power. The interrelation of these essential principles is featured in the US constitution.ü The need for

  2. Is it time to adopt a written constitution?

    to reassure themselves of the shared values that form the basis of their society by giving themselves new rules for the future. That happened, for example, when the United States declared her independence from Britain in 1776, when India attained her independence in 1947, when France adopted new regimes in

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work