• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How, do you believe, did Shakespeare want his audience to respond to the eponymous hero in Henry Vth? Your essay should include references to the differing critical responses the play has engendered.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How, do you believe, did Shakespeare want his audience to respond to the eponymous hero in Henry Vth? Your essay should include references to the differing critical responses the play has engendered. When writing "Henry Vth," Shakespeare was trying to achieve a number of responses to the character of Henry. He portrayed Henry as an eponymous hero, but this hero had faults, what needs to be discussed is whether these faults effect the audiences response to Henry and whether they are either inexcusable or unavoidable. One view of an 'eponymous hero' would require Henry to fill a number of criteria. He would have to be the basic epitome of hero, somebody that is automatically thought of when the word hero is mentioned. He must be the ideal leader and gentleman that people can look up to and be inspired by. Another approach would be that of Machiavelli. He put forward the idea that a good leader and hero may still be so even with flaws and faults. To have control and stability the leader must be capable of using cruelty and deceit as well as honesty and generosity1, it is true to say we see all of these in Henry. Taking the first approach to defining a hero, the ambiguities in Henry's character would show him to be less of an eponymous hero and more of a war criminal, but as many critics suggest, his faults are impossible to get away from. ...read more.

Middle

The second major point to look at in Henrys character is his use of God as justification. Throughout the play Henry gives the impression of being extremely pious and forever explaining that the battle is in God's will. 'But this lies all within the will of God' (1.2.290). Here Henry is reacting to the 'tennis balls' joke played on him by the Dauphin. At this same point Henry shows some quick wit, which amuses the audience, 'We will in France, by Gods grace, play a set' (1.2.263). This line serves two purposes, both the tennis pun to mock the Dauphin, and more importantly we see Henry referring to God for both motivation and justification for the battle ahead. Henry does though seem to prove his faith when he prays before the battle. This prayer though does suggest Henry has more faith in God than his own leadership. 'Steel my soldiers hearts; possess them not with fear' (4.1.283) Because of Henrys solitude when praying we are shown he is truly of strong faith and looks to God for strength and fortune rather than an excuse. The audience would have seen being pious as a strong attribute especially in a time of strong religious belief. Later in the play we see other characters try to persuade us to side with Henry, even when he commits a blatant war crime. The French kings order to 'kill all the poys (boys) ...read more.

Conclusion

Henry is also seen at the beginning of the play to be a nationalist, his description of the Scots as 'weasels, sneaking and petty thieves' (1.2. --) may also be welcomed by the audience. Nationalism though for some critics is seen as a downfall because it can lead to racism and brutality but the fact is its what the audience want to hear. In conclusion Henry is fundamentally admired by the audience for his motivational and inspirational capabilities, also his warmness and mercy as a leader and his focus. His ambiguities of character may in some eyes dampen this effect but Machiavelli was very true in saying that any heroic leader must have faults or bad patches in their personality to make them a well-rounded leader. Henry's transition from boyhood hooligan to eponymous hero is made more believable also by the inclusion of these talking points as to whether he has matured perfectly or not. In my personal opinion I would go along with the idea that Shakespeare did admire Henry and wanted to show this with his depiction on stage, the fact that critics have only started to find ambiguities 300 years after the plays first performance tells us that Shakespeare included them to make us think about Henry not doubt him. 1 Machiavelli (1469-1527) - The Prince (unknown publication and date) 2 Gary Taylor - Oxford Edition Introduction, 1998 p1 ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Henry V section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Henry V essays

  1. To What Extent Did Thomas Cromwell Shape The English Reformation?

    The precise wording of this act (no doubt much against Cromwell's private wishes) effectively made Henry a dictator and even the Church could now not escape his hand. The Royal Supremacy's primary consequence was in making the secular arm of power dominant over its ecclesiastical rival.

  2. Henry VIII'skey reason for the reformation.

    Even if he did feel that they were corrupt and neglecting their duties, even more care in appointing them would have been necessary rather than a complete break from the Pope. Clergy in general and Bishops in particular have been accused of pluralism.

  1. Would you agree that the sounds, spelling, grammar and vocabulary of present-day English and ...

    kind of evidence, that of modern dialect pronunciation, e.g., "Hwæ t sceal ic singan?" (What shall I sing?) (ln. 11) GRAMMAR 10. In this section, I shall analyse the grammar as used in the Caedmon extract in comparison to modern English, as follow: a.

  2. Shakespeare's illustrations of Kingship in Richard II and Henry IV pts. I & II

    one of the senior Appellants in the campaign to try and effectively depose the young Richard in 1386. In neglecting to reveal these facts Shakespeare¹s play opens with a moral question mark hanging over the head of his king. We cannot draw an informed conclusion without the presentation of a balanced argument from the dramatist.

  1. "In relation to other factors, how far was Henry's desire for divorce the main ...

    This was quickly followed by her coronation and was reinforced by legislation, in the form of the Succession and Treason Acts of 1534. One historian's opinion on the question of the divorce's significance is such, "The only way to get what he wanted (...Divorce)

  2. To what extent was Englandin a state of political, socio-economic and religious crisis at ...

    Indeed, Heard's view that he was "an arrogant self-seeker" is far more likely. It would be far more in Somerset's political interests for the aristocracy to support him, not for the poor to. Another main area of crisis at this time was religion, and Henry's policies were the root cause - his legacy was "a nation divided in religion".

  1. During this project our focus was on the inclusion and exclusion of people on ...

    Unfortunately, the mental representations of people within society are a very strong barrier which is very difficult to break down. Without removing this barrier, inclusion for ex-prisoners is very hard. Until people start seeing them as fellow members of the community, they will not be treated as such, thus remaining socially excluded.

  2. The English Reformation.

    However, as time continued to pass, Wolsley had failed in his attempts to secure the King's divorce. Anne and her supporters quickly realized this, and sought to bring about his fall. The fall of Wolsley was primarily Anne's success. In conjunction with her father, Anne persuaded Henry that Wolsley was

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work