A Review of Two Journal Articles.

Extracts from this essay...

Introduction

A Review of Two Journal Articles INTRODUCTION I have chosen to review 'How the media reports medical errors: Blunders will never cease' (BMJ 2001;322:562) by T. Jackson, and 'Medicine and the media: Media dents confidence in MMR vaccine' (BMJ 1998;316:561) by N. Begg et al. Both articles insinuate that the media misinforms the public about health issues. I shall provide a critical analysis of these articles, focusing on the usefulness and the impact of these articles on clinical practice. I shall also look at the research methods used by the authors to come up with the basis of their argument. CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF 'HOW THE MEDIA REPORT MEDICAL ERRORS' The argument put forward by Jackson is that doctors will always make mistakes, and whilst the media will place blame on the doctors, the system should be blamed instead. His main argument is that "the extent of errors and the system failures are overlooked". The way this argument is presented is in a style that reads more like an opinion.

Middle

The author is merely stating his opinion and there is no in-depth analysis. I doubt it would have an impact on clinical practice, or on the way the media reports medical errors. However, he does provide an alternative, acceptable, method of reporting medical errors in saying "there is a need for a system based rather than a blame based approach". CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF 'MEDICINE AND THE MEDIA' The argument put forward by Begg et al is that the negative reporting by the media has damaged the MMR vaccination programme. This article is a stark contrast to the previous one. The article by Begg et al is not written as if an opinion is being stated; points are made and backed up with evidence. For example, Begg et al have used an article from the Communicable Disease Report to come up with the point that "coverage of the first dose of MMR vaccine in the UK fell last quarter after adverse publicity in the press".

Conclusion

This article is useful in that it highlights why the media adversely reporting MMR vaccine is a problem, and it brings together all the data on the affect this reporting has had on MMR vaccine coverage, and on peoples' perception of MMR vaccine. However, the article could have improved on its usefulness as it states "it is important to restore public confidence in the vaccine" but it doesn't actually go into a discussion about how this could be done. This article probably did have an impact on health professionals when it came out because the figures showed exactly how much of an affect the media had on MMR vaccine coverage, and because of the persuasive language used. CONCLUSION To conclude, the article 'medicine and the media' was more useful, had more of impact and was written better than 'how the media report medical errors'. Begg et al used a wider range of sources in their research and backed up points with evidence from their research, whereas Jackson seemed to be merely stating an opinion without much in the way of evidence.

The above preview is unformatted text

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • Over 150,000 essays available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Over 180,000 student essays
  • Every subject and level covered
  • Thousands of essays marked by teachers

Related University Degree Problem Based Learning cases

  1. Clinical care case study. Mrs. Burton was left with a mixture of emotion mostly ...

    However the good experience of care that Mrs Burton received was the support from her family who identified what was depression and went through each issue surrounding depression such as the cause and symptoms of receiving depression and the medication that was prescribed to her by her GP.

  2. What is immunisation and how does it work?

    Research in the past has shown that there has been no links with MMR and autism and researchers have said that autism was well known long before MMR was ever used in the United Kingdom. From looking at a leaflet promoting the use of MMR it clearly states "there is

  1. What Is Immunisation?

    What are the side effects of immunisation? Common side effects of immunisation are redness and soreness at the site of injections and mild fever. While these symptoms may concern you and upset your child at the time, the benefit of immunisation is protection from the disease.

  2. Is there a link between the MMR vaccine and the increasing number of cases ...

    Gupta commented on the striking association between the MMR vaccine and the onset of behavioral symptoms in all children that he had investigated for regressive autism." The Lancet · Vol. 351 · February 28, 1998. This hypothesis was based on a study of 12 children, 9 of which the child's

  1. Anaphylactoid reactions from Iopromide in patient with angina undergoing angiography - Pharmacovigilance Brief Report ...

    conjunction with the osmolality of radio contrast media solution may also explains the nephrotoxicity of this agent. 11 Since the patient does not demonstrate the symptoms, the author supposes it is not necessarily discussed further in this article. Management and Prophylaxis of Idiopathic Anaphylactic Non-ionic iodinated contrast media-induced adverse reactions and common allergic reactions have much in common.

  2. With medical advances promising ever more detailed pre-natal genetic screening, do we have a ...

    We must not think this is reason not to try and accommodate them as far as possible, but we must accept that they are at a disadvantage. It has also been argued by Dr. Tom Shakespeare that there are a lot more pressing problems in society that lead to inequality of opportunity such as lack of social class mobility.

  1. MMR Vaccination.

    The National Association for Colitis and Crohn's has looked at the evidence and supports the two dose MMR programme in the UK. Autism Autism is a condition which leads to delayed speech and communication and intellectual impairment, which is usually diagnosed in the second year of life.

  2. This report aims to outline the processes, eligibility criteria and Medicare funding involved with ...

    * If there is no risk of transmitting genetic abnormalities/diseases to the embryo. (NHMRC, 2013) Medicare Funding for IVF: The cost of IVF is subject to variation across IVF fertility clinics and practitioners. Medicare, however, sets clear guidelines on financial rebate amounts that can be claimed (Department of Human Services, 2013).

  • Over 180,000 essays
    written by students
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to write
    your own great essays

Marked by a teacher

This essay has been marked by one of our great teachers. You can read the full teachers notes when you download the essay.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review on the essay page.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review under the essay preview on this page.