• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A Review of Two Journal Articles.

Extracts from this document...


A Review of Two Journal Articles INTRODUCTION I have chosen to review 'How the media reports medical errors: Blunders will never cease' (BMJ 2001;322:562) by T. Jackson, and 'Medicine and the media: Media dents confidence in MMR vaccine' (BMJ 1998;316:561) by N. Begg et al. Both articles insinuate that the media misinforms the public about health issues. I shall provide a critical analysis of these articles, focusing on the usefulness and the impact of these articles on clinical practice. I shall also look at the research methods used by the authors to come up with the basis of their argument. CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF 'HOW THE MEDIA REPORT MEDICAL ERRORS' The argument put forward by Jackson is that doctors will always make mistakes, and whilst the media will place blame on the doctors, the system should be blamed instead. His main argument is that "the extent of errors and the system failures are overlooked". The way this argument is presented is in a style that reads more like an opinion. ...read more.


The author is merely stating his opinion and there is no in-depth analysis. I doubt it would have an impact on clinical practice, or on the way the media reports medical errors. However, he does provide an alternative, acceptable, method of reporting medical errors in saying "there is a need for a system based rather than a blame based approach". CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF 'MEDICINE AND THE MEDIA' The argument put forward by Begg et al is that the negative reporting by the media has damaged the MMR vaccination programme. This article is a stark contrast to the previous one. The article by Begg et al is not written as if an opinion is being stated; points are made and backed up with evidence. For example, Begg et al have used an article from the Communicable Disease Report to come up with the point that "coverage of the first dose of MMR vaccine in the UK fell last quarter after adverse publicity in the press". ...read more.


This article is useful in that it highlights why the media adversely reporting MMR vaccine is a problem, and it brings together all the data on the affect this reporting has had on MMR vaccine coverage, and on peoples' perception of MMR vaccine. However, the article could have improved on its usefulness as it states "it is important to restore public confidence in the vaccine" but it doesn't actually go into a discussion about how this could be done. This article probably did have an impact on health professionals when it came out because the figures showed exactly how much of an affect the media had on MMR vaccine coverage, and because of the persuasive language used. CONCLUSION To conclude, the article 'medicine and the media' was more useful, had more of impact and was written better than 'how the media report medical errors'. Begg et al used a wider range of sources in their research and backed up points with evidence from their research, whereas Jackson seemed to be merely stating an opinion without much in the way of evidence. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Problem Based Learning cases section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Problem Based Learning cases essays

  1. Clinical care case study. Mrs. Burton was left with a mixture of emotion mostly ...

    However the good experience of care that Mrs Burton received was the support from her family who identified what was depression and went through each issue surrounding depression such as the cause and symptoms of receiving depression and the medication that was prescribed to her by her GP.

  2. With medical advances promising ever more detailed pre-natal genetic screening, do we have a ...

    However an embryo is not 'someone' as it has no concept of itself; it cannot value its own existence. This theory, proposed by Harris and termed 'personhood'ix stipulates that an embryo is merely a potential person, in the same way that a sperm cell is half a potential person.

  1. Is there a link between the MMR triple vaccine and the increasing number of ...

    The researchers suggested that the MMR vaccine led to intestinal abnormalities, resulting in impaired intestinal function and developmental regression within 24 hours to a few weeks of the vaccine. The report in the Lancet stated, "Rubella virus is associated with autism and the combined measles, mumps and rubella vaccine has also been implicated.

  2. MMR Vaccination.

    The child may be generally less vigorous, have a slight fever and possibly a rash, most often about a week after the immunisation and lasting about two or three days.

  1. What is immunisation and how does it work?

    Some vaccinations, for example the tetanus vaccine, can last up to 30 years. Very young babies rarely catch the infectious diseases common in childhood because antibodies, obtained from the mother, protect them from these infectious diseases. Antibodies from the mother survive in the baby for several months.

  2. Anaphylactoid reactions from Iopromide in patient with angina undergoing angiography - Pharmacovigilance Brief Report ...

    CASE REPORT A 55yr old patient with a history of angina is being assessed for a coronary bypass. Undergoing an angiography, on infusion of non-ionic iodinated radio contrast media (Iopromide), incidence is occurred. Clinical manifestations are consistent with anaphylactoid reactions.

  1. Should my child have the MMR vaccination?

    infected by some bacteria that are causes of the disease at about 5 days. The following take place between 5 days and 28 days. The bacteria reproduce. It makes antibodies to destroy the bacteria. The white blood cells reproduce, now there are lots of white blood cells making antibodies.

  2. This report aims to outline the processes, eligibility criteria and Medicare funding involved with ...

    and $2804 for each subsequent year (Virtus Health, 2013), compared to the original $8155 (Virtus Health, 2013). Ethical Issues of IVF: Rights of the Mother: In evaluating the scenario through the perspective of autonomy, the woman is considered free to decide such an aspect of her life (McNeill, Torda, Little, & Hewson, 2004).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work