Nastasia Garcia

Psychology of Creativity

12/3/08

The book that I decided to write this midterm in is Witness to the Fire: Creativity and the Veil of Addiction by Linda Leonard, this book speaks explores the dark and fiery journey of transformation from the bondage of addiction to the freedom of recovery through creativity.  This powerful book spans the realms of Jungian psychology, existential philosophy, and literary analysis to explore the relationship between addiction and creativity. By examining the lives of writers such as Dostoevsky, Jean Rhys, and Eugene O'Neill, as well as the experiences of people in recovery, Leonard notes the high percentage of addicts in the creative arts, while also looking at the ways in which addiction can throw light on the creative process and how the creative journey can contribute to the healing of addiction

Leonard uses the theme of archetypes to demonstrate the different types of people who are involved with addiction, some of these archetypes that I thought were interesting and significant  in PART ONE: THE FLIGHT are:

  1. THE MONEYLENDER- this I found to be quite symbolic in many ways in reference to my life and in general to what I have seen in other people, it had a lot of significance.  The Moneylender when entering the psyche tries to be the master controller; it manipulates us through debt and feelings of guilt. Guilt being the main motivation for addiction in this figure, the Moneylender. What I found in this archetype that really spoke to me was the partner of whoever may be involved in the Moneylenders life, “the co-addict” they themselves are addicted in controlling and blaming the addict. Leonard confirms “in this pattern the codependent gets a feeling of power and virtuousness from the addict’s guilt and dependency while the addict depends on the co-addict for survival and often projects his own strength and goodness on the partner.”  Somehow after reading this I saw a connection with my relationship with by on and off relationship with my significant other, I saw myself playing the role of the co-addict at times. He has an addiction to cocaine and I could see the guilt in him many times and his “acting out” from it as well.  Because of this I played of the role described here, almost like a martyr, it is a very self destructive role and it is a constant battle. I think that Leonard did a great job on describing this type of conflict in these types of relationships between addicts and co-addicts.
  2. THE ROMANTIC- this archetype I found very interesting and alluring. I think it is also quite deceitful in the psyche of an addict. Yet at the same time the Romantic can bring forth our creativity and help the person into spiritual transformation. I thought a valid point that Leonard made was that in all types of addiction the Romantic figure is present. After reading I could see that it did make a lot of sense, I could see this occurring in my life along with others. What is funny is that I have been asking myself this question lately-- why do we as humans always want to be in a relationship? It seems the whole “happily ever after” concept is always omnipresent in our daily lives. This idealism of having the perfect relationship is always behind lurking in the shadows. I think it is important in creativity and just as a whole to be able to accept our aloneness, to be able to be comfortable in just be alone. Although it is important to keep in mind that aloneness is the opposite of loneliness, this being  the negative connotation of being on your own. I believe once you learn to be content in being without a relationship, a lot of spiritual doors open for you. I suppose this is why it is important in the twelve steps to stay away from having a relationship. Having a committed relationship takes a lot out of you and if you are subject to addiction this could be quite straining on a person’s self discovery.
  3. THE OUTLAW- here we see a wild, dangerous figure that is at odds with society and is daring to be different. Leonard states, “according to Jung, this fantasy expressing, a feeling of difference is at its source a first call from the greater Self. It is an expression of ‘the divine child archetype,’ of the deep thirst for creative spirit.” This figure addiction thrives on being different and the “badass”, supposedly they allow this projection of thinking it’s “me against the world” to justify these addictive tendencies and acts. Leonard then goes on to speak about an analysis of the Rebel by Albert Camus.  He goes on to say that the rebellion is what saves this Outlaw figure, because unlike the Outlaw the Rebel can use this to fight of the addiction and in turn bring forth creativity. Leonard confirms, “according to Campus, rebellion is a principle of human existence. Taken to its utmost limits, it implies a positive value to society and a hope for the creation of new ways to realize this value, as opposed to conformity to rigid, destructive social structures. Rebellion implies the acceptance of suffering within our human limits and ultimately, the decision to endure.”
Join now!

Here are some archetypes of PART TWO: THE FALL that I found fascinating and also I have to say very heartbreaking after reading some of the stories from these certain archetypes

  1. THE MADWOMEN:  is typically at the heart of every addiction. Her energy is so destructive that it may lead insanity. Madness and addiction have been linked together forever. However through the madness one can find resolution and rediscover the creativity within. Although the Madwoman is scary place to be, it is basically being face to face to your polluted addicted self and that alone is scary ...

This is a preview of the whole essay