• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16

A characterization of communicative competence and the barriers that impede successful intercultural communication

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

MPhil in Intercultural Communication General Linguistics 897 Module 4 A characterization of communicative competence and the barriers that impede successful intercultural communication B Leroni 24 October 2005 Responsible Lecturer: Ms. Ondene van Dulm Table of Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. Criteria for intercultural communicative competence 3 2.1 Appropriateness 4 2.2 Effectiveness 4 2.3 Satisfaction 5 3. Components of intercultural communicative competence 5 3.1 In-depth knowledge 6 3.2 Mindfulness 6 3.3 Communication skill 7 4. The role of sympathy and empathy in intercultural conflict management 8 4.1. Sympathy 8 4.2. Empathy 9 5. Barriers to intercultural communication 10 5.1 High Anxiety 10 5.2 Stereotyping 11 5.3 Ethnocentrism 12 6. A case study of deficient intercultural communication 13 7. Conclusion 15 Bibliography 16 1. Introduction Intercultural communicative competence is, according to Ting-Toomey (1999:261), about the ability to apply theoretical knowledge of cultural differences in a sensitive way that facilitates successful intercultural communication. In this sense intercultural communication is, according to Bennett (1998:2-3), "difference-based" versus communication between people from the same culture (mono-cultural communication) which is "similarity based". This assignment discusses the central role that sensitivity to cultural differences plays in successful intercultural communication. The assignment comprises five sections. The first two sections describe the underpinning criteria and components of intercultural communicative competence. The third section deals with the role of sympathy and empathy in intercultural communication. This is followed, in the fourth section, by a description of intercultural communication barriers. Finally, the fifth section examines an example of a deficient intercultural interaction. 2. Criteria for intercultural communicative competence This section describes the criteria against which intercultural communicative competence should be measured. Ting-Toomey (1999:262) identifies three criteria for communicative competence. ...read more.

Middle

Sympathy therefore involves the communicator applying his personal perspective to understand the experience of others. The use of sympathy with its concomitant emphasis on similar experiences and similar realities has the potential to exacerbate rather than to soothe intercultural conflict situations. This perspective is supported by Bennett (1998:202) who identifies four disadvantages that are associated with sympathy as an intercultural communicative strategy. He says firstly, that sympathy is blind to the differences between people because it focuses on similarity of experience, feeling and thought. Secondly, sympathy can be perceived as patronizing because it assumes a universally applicable experience of reality. Thirdly, sympathy can promote defensiveness because it can be perceived to marginalise the experiences of others who retaliate by defending their values. Fourthly, sympathy perpetuates assumptions of similarity between people thereby reinforcing an ongoing cycle of intercultural misunderstanding. 4.2. Empathy Empathy, in contrast to sympathy, refers to the ability of communicators to "imagine the thoughts and feelings of people from their own perspectives" (Bennett 1998:197). Empathy represents, according to Bennett (1998:207), a communicative strategy that is well suited to intercultural communication because it involves pro-actively taking on the perspectives of others. Bennett (1998:209-212) proposes a six step process for developing empathy. In step 1 the communicator accepts that other people are different as well as the need to understand these differences. Step 2 involves the communicator reflecting on his own principles, values and assumptions so that he does not feel vulnerable to losing his unique sense of perspective. In step 3 the communicator suspends his own identity thereby opening himself to new ideas that extend beyond his familiar experience. Steps 4 and 5 involve the communicator consciously shifting his awareness toward exploring the experience that others have of their reality. ...read more.

Conclusion

The executive, as the most provocative of the parties, could have changed the negative tone of the interaction in four ways. Firstly, he should have accommodated the consultative processes required to support the union delegation's collectivist orientation. Secondly, he should have focussed on understanding the face honouring strategies governing the interaction with the lead official. Thirdly, he should have used more inclusive language. Fourthly, he should have minimised his role in favour of a local executive when it became evident that he could not cope with the African accented English. The conflict that resulted from this interaction could have been avoided if both parties had been more aware of their differences and how these influenced their communicative behaviour. This might have involved a conscious approach to identify and understand the underpinning attitudes and values that were driving their respective communicative behaviours. This could have served as the starting point for developing a more empathetic approach to the negotiation. Such an approach may, for example, have involved a practical intervention to brief the unionists prior to the meeting thereby facilitating their mandate process. By the same token, the union's lead negotiator could have positioned himself closer to and established more eye contact with the executive in order facilitate better decoding of his accented English. 7. Conclusion A key determinant of intercultural communication competence requires that communicators are able to adjust their own expectations of the intercultural interaction whilst simultaneously adjusting their communicative behavior to the expectations of other parties (Ting-Toomey 1999:226-227). This assignment has attempted to characterize the intercultural communicative factors that make this possible. The resultant discussion has examined the criteria and components of intercultural communication, the role of sympathy and empathy in intercultural communication and the barriers that impede intercultural communication. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Anthropology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Anthropology essays

  1. Discuss the extent to which tourism is a neo colonialist activity supported by cultural ...

    (www.tjapukai.com.au 13/05/07) It states on its website that; 'It is both a magnificent attraction and a milestone accomplishment - a privately owned business with the majority shareholding forever in the hands of the Aboriginal tribal councils themselves. ' However a study by Dyer et al (2003 p.87)

  2. Indirectness in communication

    Jamaliah makes use of the theory to carry out the research in Malay culture to test the validity of the politeness theory. The writer manages to find one research that was based on the same theoretical framework like Jamaliah did.

  1. Need for multi-national companies to identify and evaluate the risks associated with national culture ...

    Furthermore, "those in favour of the divergence thesis would even oppose the possibility of delayed convergence, since they argue that national, and in some cases regional, institutional contexts are not only slow to change, partly because they derive from deep-seated beliefs and value-systems and partly because major re-distributions of power are involved, but, more importantly [.

  2. THE CASE OF BARBIE

    Multinational corporations manufacture products in many countries and sell to consumers around the world. Money, technology and raw materials move ever more swiftly across national borders. Along with products and finances, ideas and cultures circulate more freely. But for billions of the world's people, business-driven globalization means uprooting old ways of life and threatening livelihoods and cultures.

  1. A brief critical discussion of the five savoirs that Byram and his associates use ...

    The notional functional syllabus enjoyed a strong institutional backing in Europe. Wilkins (1972, 1976) put forward a syllabus that was organised according to the range of notions that language can express, frequency, duration, quantity and the communicative functions performed through language, offering, declining etc..

  2. Identity Anxiety

    For this exercise in self-identification, the Olympic Games were bound to be a proving-ground. Every four years the Australian brand is launched again on the world stage, the narratives of hardship and mateship rewritten, the hopes reinvested, the medals recounted, and the nation reassured.

  1. "Kinship must, ultimately, refer to biology and genealogy". Discuss.

    action of 'transferring' the substance which establishes the relationship thus, the biological nature of kin has to be initiated by an action, thus making it cultural. Although it can be argued that ancestry includes blood relations, this could also be misleading in and exemplify ethnocentric bias.

  2. Talk in Context: Applying Theoretical Understanding

    If we do not communicate clearly using these mediums what we are trying to discuss, ambiguity and misunderstanding will be the result (Ibid.). However, poor communication is not the only cause of misinterpretation, indeed an individual's connotative understanding of a signifier will differ according to cultural background, social class and many other individual factors (Schirato and Yell, 2000).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work