• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Absolutism And Relativism.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Absolutism And Relativism Absolutism is to maintain that some things are right and other things are wrong, and that these things are fixed for all time, in all situations and for all people. This is also known as hard universalism - it denies plural morality and insists there is only one universal moral code. Moral rules are a priori, meaning that moral laws can be found without experience because they are inherently right, without taking account of the outcome, circumstance, culture or opinion. For example, in Christianity the Ten Commandments guide the way to knowing what one should not do: "Do not murder", "Do not steal", "Do not bear false witness" etc. An example of an ethical absolutist is St Thomas Aquinas, who believed in a fixed divine law (Natural Moral Law). Aquinas' basic law of natural moral law: "...that good is to be done and pursued, and evil is to be avoided..." which expresses an absolutist perspective. Another absolutist, Plato, argued that goodness, the highest form of reality, was an absolute thing that existed eternally and beyond this world, occupied by forms or ideas, which are the true reality. For example, a beautiful picture had "form beauty" in it; without form beauty there would be no beautiful things. In other words, without forms there is no reality. Strengths And Weaknesses Of Absolutism Absolutism provides a fixed ethical code to measure actions. For example, an ethical absolutist can disapprove of Hitler's extremist political regime, Nazi Germany or the wife-beater ("you must never beat your wife and this remains true all the time"). ...read more.

Middle

For example, long-ago, it was usual to abandon highwaymen in hanging cages to starve and decay. Nowadays, that type of chastisement is deemed to be morally unacceptable. History has also shown that women, for example, were not given the same property rights as men and they were prohibited from voting. The situation today is quite different. Justice has been served and many countries give men and women equal status, such as in the United Kingdom. Strengths And Weaknesses Of Relativism Relativism explains the existence of the different values that people hold. In other words, it prohibits a dominant culture from enforcing itself over others simply because "we're right and they're wrong". In other words, it suits the multicultural nature of the world, because it gives equal measure to the various cultural and religious alliances (groupings). If you believe that there is a single objective morality then you will believe that many communities and cultures are wrong. On the contrary, who are you to say that whole civilisations which have developed over hundreds of years, are wrong? Furthermore, in this day and age societies have to live together, and this will not be achieved if they disrespect eachother's beliefs about goodness and badness. Hence if we want to live in peace in a world where different ways of life coexist, then we should abstain from accusing other cultures of being mistaken about what is right. Hence it makes it easy to tolerate the different moral beliefs of people in other societies. ...read more.

Conclusion

It seems relativists exaggerate the differences between one culture and another. Relativists do, however, adopt an absolute principle: "Be tolerant of everyone's different moral codes". Additionally, relativism continues to be popular because it has been incorporated into situation ethics, because the loving thing to do will depend on the situation, and as no two situations are ever exactly alike, different courses of action might be right in some circumstances but wrong in others, and utilitarianism, which describes goodness as more or less with respect to the amount of happiness generated. Linking Absolutism, Relativism, Objectivism And Subjectivism Objective = Not biased; existing in the real world outside the human mind; factual; impartial. Subjective = Based on personal feelings or prejudices. Absolutists hold that some things are wrong from an objective point of view, not just wrong from your or my perspective. The moral way of living is to do things that are objectively good and avoid things that are objectively bad. Things that are right or wrong can't change and they don't depend on the situation. For example, torturing children, rape and murder are always wrong. What is right and wrong for you is the same for me and for every other person in the world. Relativists believe that morals are subjective - subject to the culture, religion, time and place. There is no objective moral truth, or if there is we cannot know it. What is right for one group of people may be wrong for another group of people. For example, certain Greeks burnt the bodies of their fathers, while a different people called Callations ate the bodies of their fathers. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Religion in Society section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Religion in Society essays

  1. How much and in what ways has 9/11 influenced public perceptions and the self ...

    a total 'faith in God' (Ramadan, 2004, P129), a spiritual and intellectual education, in order to ground the 'Islamic education' in reality. There needs to be a link between their educational life and faith. Khan 'underlines the point that educational need does not end with formal schooling, but includes adult participation and access to services' (Khan in Herbert (ed)

  2. The entry sets out five individually necessary conditions for anyone to be a candidate ...

    (1997)), where no legal protection is in place, suggest that the pattern of things in The Netherlands and elsewhere is quite similar. If active euthanasia is widely practised but in ways that are not legally recognized there is apt in fact to be more danger that the distinction between voluntary

  1. I would like to begin my evaluation of moral relativism by further exploring the ...

    This is because in order to formulate a judgement you must compare one set of morals onto your own (Hinman, 2005). It is neither suitable, nor incompatible to compare one's own culture from another, primarily because the understanding of moral normality differs from society to society.

  2. Is the influence of religion in western society declining? Can we reasonably measure its ...

    Hamilton's argument points out that less people join trade unions or political parties; this doesn't mean that they don't believe, but are alternatively more committed to family or individual priorities. Hamilton (2001) also points out that fewer people are church members, possibly due to this same occurrence.

  1. What is morality, and within morality what can be considered fact or merely an ...

    To take this concept further, it is the belief that although society is flawed, it does not see morality as tangible (i.e. through rules and regulations) but rather as a natural perception that an action will cause harm if performed and vice versa.

  2. Is abortion a morally just practice?

    There is no point of change that can be pointed to that marks the transition from an organism with all the moral relevance of a cancerous lump to a newborn child. As Singer demonstrates by evaluating four of these attempts it is impossible to do this.

  1. Evaluate the ethical arguments for and against keeping a person alive against his or ...

    All forms of comfort are good but not only can discomfort be negative, no comfort is considered a bad thing as Epicurus says; 'No pleasure is a bad thing in itself'. It is also necessary for him to consider the way in which pleasure is generated and the consequences from

  2. racism in britain GB

    In other words Figures had shown that 95.8% of British white teachers were given the maximum pay rise in comparison to 87.79% and 80.2% Bangladeshi and African black of the same qualifications. This clearly states racial discrimination in employment as ethnic minorities are most likely to be paid less and

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work