Absolutism And Relativism.

Extracts from this essay...

Introduction

Absolutism And Relativism Absolutism is to maintain that some things are right and other things are wrong, and that these things are fixed for all time, in all situations and for all people. This is also known as hard universalism - it denies plural morality and insists there is only one universal moral code. Moral rules are a priori, meaning that moral laws can be found without experience because they are inherently right, without taking account of the outcome, circumstance, culture or opinion. For example, in Christianity the Ten Commandments guide the way to knowing what one should not do: "Do not murder", "Do not steal", "Do not bear false witness" etc. An example of an ethical absolutist is St Thomas Aquinas, who believed in a fixed divine law (Natural Moral Law). Aquinas' basic law of natural moral law: "...that good is to be done and pursued, and evil is to be avoided..." which expresses an absolutist perspective. Another absolutist, Plato, argued that goodness, the highest form of reality, was an absolute thing that existed eternally and beyond this world, occupied by forms or ideas, which are the true reality. For example, a beautiful picture had "form beauty" in it; without form beauty there would be no beautiful things. In other words, without forms there is no reality. Strengths And Weaknesses Of Absolutism Absolutism provides a fixed ethical code to measure actions. For example, an ethical absolutist can disapprove of Hitler's extremist political regime, Nazi Germany or the wife-beater ("you must never beat your wife and this remains true all the time").

Middle

For example, long-ago, it was usual to abandon highwaymen in hanging cages to starve and decay. Nowadays, that type of chastisement is deemed to be morally unacceptable. History has also shown that women, for example, were not given the same property rights as men and they were prohibited from voting. The situation today is quite different. Justice has been served and many countries give men and women equal status, such as in the United Kingdom. Strengths And Weaknesses Of Relativism Relativism explains the existence of the different values that people hold. In other words, it prohibits a dominant culture from enforcing itself over others simply because "we're right and they're wrong". In other words, it suits the multicultural nature of the world, because it gives equal measure to the various cultural and religious alliances (groupings). If you believe that there is a single objective morality then you will believe that many communities and cultures are wrong. On the contrary, who are you to say that whole civilisations which have developed over hundreds of years, are wrong? Furthermore, in this day and age societies have to live together, and this will not be achieved if they disrespect eachother's beliefs about goodness and badness. Hence if we want to live in peace in a world where different ways of life coexist, then we should abstain from accusing other cultures of being mistaken about what is right. Hence it makes it easy to tolerate the different moral beliefs of people in other societies.

Conclusion

It seems relativists exaggerate the differences between one culture and another. Relativists do, however, adopt an absolute principle: "Be tolerant of everyone's different moral codes". Additionally, relativism continues to be popular because it has been incorporated into situation ethics, because the loving thing to do will depend on the situation, and as no two situations are ever exactly alike, different courses of action might be right in some circumstances but wrong in others, and utilitarianism, which describes goodness as more or less with respect to the amount of happiness generated. Linking Absolutism, Relativism, Objectivism And Subjectivism Objective = Not biased; existing in the real world outside the human mind; factual; impartial. Subjective = Based on personal feelings or prejudices. Absolutists hold that some things are wrong from an objective point of view, not just wrong from your or my perspective. The moral way of living is to do things that are objectively good and avoid things that are objectively bad. Things that are right or wrong can't change and they don't depend on the situation. For example, torturing children, rape and murder are always wrong. What is right and wrong for you is the same for me and for every other person in the world. Relativists believe that morals are subjective - subject to the culture, religion, time and place. There is no objective moral truth, or if there is we cannot know it. What is right for one group of people may be wrong for another group of people. For example, certain Greeks burnt the bodies of their fathers, while a different people called Callations ate the bodies of their fathers.

The above preview is unformatted text

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • Over 150,000 essays available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Over 180,000 student essays
  • Every subject and level covered
  • Thousands of essays marked by teachers

Related University Degree Religion in Society

  1. Ethnography - A Christian Youth Group

    The topic had to have something to do with the "theme" of the day. In this case it was "Sexual Abstinence". She gave me some insight regarding the openness that exists within this cultural scene, by exemplifying: "....let me tell you...people got carried away with some of the lyrics they were making up...but it was funny to hear them...

  2. How much and in what ways has 9/11 influenced public perceptions and the self ...

    Cesari also believes that it is local level discussion, such as the hijab debate in France (Islam in the West, 2007, fig 3.3) which brings Islam to the fore front of political discussion and that adverse media attention heightens anti-Islamic feelings.

  1. Is the influence of religion in western society declining? Can we reasonably measure its ...

    Hervieu Leger (1993) suggests that what securalists see as religious decline is merely the reorganisation of religion so that it better suits the needs of modern societies. People in today's society are been offered an increasingly) varied choice of what is acceptable to serve god.

  2. The entry sets out five individually necessary conditions for anyone to be a candidate ...

    amount to the intentional bringing about of the death of the person being cared for. So that there is no misunderstanding, it should be conceded that there are circumstances where doctors can truthfully say that actions which they perform, or omissions which they make, do lead to the deaths of their patients without them intending that those patients should die.

  1. Is abortion a morally just practice?

    As he says: 'the Conservative is on solid ground'. The four points of moral relevance that conservatives find philosophically inadequate are birth, viability, quickening and the onset of consciousness. Birth is the most visible, but appeals more too moral intuition that rational argument.

  2. What exactly is 'cultural relativism' in metaethics? Is cultural relativism true? Can cultural relativists ...

    believing ourselves to be superior to say Iraq in the case of the United States we may be merely highlighting our arrogance. I will continue by assessing whether cultural relativism is true by dealing with some key criticisms of the theory.

  1. To what extent, if any, do feminist ethics improve upon traditional ethical theories?

    In this vein, Ruddick has argued for the superiority of the care ethic in her work 'Maternal Thinking',14 although she has subsequently qualified this approach somewhat. Annette Baier regards traditional theories as being incomplete in that they cannot adequately articulate the wider 'moral world', which includes women.15 She calls for

  2. I will examine the cultural expression of religion, and discuss the role that the ...

    and the celebrities are physically remote, the sheer volume and regularity of information dispensed serves to create an illusion of closeness; in reality though, it is debateable that the subject of the fanâs affection does not even know or care about the emotional connection at all (Cashmore, 2006, p. 261).

  • Over 180,000 essays
    written by students
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to write
    your own great essays

Marked by a teacher

This essay has been marked by one of our great teachers. You can read the full teachers notes when you download the essay.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review on the essay page.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review under the essay preview on this page.