Assess the impact of Thatcherism on British Society

Authors Avatar

Assess the impact of Thatcherism on British Society

The aim of this assignment is to evaluate to what point the ‘Thatcher’ administration during its political reign had an effect on the British society.  Some of the key points and policies that were adopted by the successive Conservative governments will be discussed, thus giving a broader viewpoint over topics such as, the reform within the welfare state, the divergence with the ‘Trade Unions’, the consecutive public sector privatisations and the handling of the ‘Education system’.

It was in the 1980’s that the British education system was to begin a transformation, due to a governmental desire to improve the education provided in order to increase Britain’s competitiveness on the international market.  The neo-liberals believed that with the introduction of a market system, the competition that would evolve between schools and other providers of education would greatly improve the education offered and therefore its efficacy (Fulcher & Schott, 2003).  With the passing of the Education Act 1988, local education authorities (LEA), saw their powers reallocated to that of the school’s governing board and similarly teachers control transferred to that of the parents (Dearlove & Saunders, 1984).  Although the LEAs lost control of education, parents were encouraged to participate actively in their progeny’s academic well-being, as they now had the possibility to choose (Fulcher & Schott, 2003).  Research performed by Gewirtz et al (1995) on the education system post conservative reform indicated a movement; schools were now enthusiastic to attract academically sound students, in order to boost rankings at GCSE examinations and consequently in the published ‘League Tables’.

Amongst the most effective policies proposed by the Thatcher government, was that of its privatisation scheme, though it was omitted from the 1979 conservative manifesto, it was to become a significant factor (Gamble, 1988).  In taking office following the general election, the government was faced with the failing ‘public sector’, shying away from its mixed economy ideology, the government believed that in continuing to subsidise these ailing industries would only result in undesirable tax increases supported by the ‘private sector’.  Gradually between 1979 and 1997, the government was to sell off its stakes in companies such as automobile manufacturers, ‘British Steel’, ‘British Telecom’ and ‘British Gas’, to name just a few (Dearlove & Saunders, 1984).  The privatising of these public industries produced a dual effect, initially raising capital that could be re-injected into other sectors as necessary, and secondly, it became evident to many individuals that there was a possibility of making a quick profit from such privatisation schemes (Dearlove & Saunders, 1984).  The quantity of individual shareholders partaking rose from three million in 1979 to that of nine million in 1987 (Gamble, 1988).  It should not be forgotten that although many of these industries produced profit, once their privatisation concluded, but this profitability came at the expense of employees’ redundancies, increased work schedules and enhanced prices (Wilson, 1992).

Join now!

Remaining within the domain of privatisation, it was with the passing of the ‘Housing Act 1980’ that the Thatcher administration wished to increase the possibility of property ownership to the least fortunate members of the British public: council housing tenants (Dearlove & Saunders, 1984).  Tenants were offered the right to buy their council accommodation with a substantial reduction ranging from 50% to that of 70%, though the offer appeared generous per se, a number of tenants were indirectly excluded, those living in high-rise apartments or neglected areas who did not wish to purchase (Edgell & Duke, 1991).  While the ...

This is a preview of the whole essay