Remaining within the domain of privatisation, it was with the passing of the ‘Housing Act 1980’ that the Thatcher administration wished to increase the possibility of property ownership to the least fortunate members of the British public: council housing tenants (Dearlove & Saunders, 1984). Tenants were offered the right to buy their council accommodation with a substantial reduction ranging from 50% to that of 70%, though the offer appeared generous per se, a number of tenants were indirectly excluded, those living in high-rise apartments or neglected areas who did not wish to purchase (Edgell & Duke, 1991). While the percentage of homeowners have increased since the act was passed, it is argued that the housing situation in Britain is seen to be the “New Right’s greatest single failure”. As parallel to this increase in ownership, the number of homeless individuals and those in temporary lodgings have unfortunately increased at a faster rate, due to the lack of council property available and the reluctance to construct new accommodation, they are simply priced out of the market (Wilson, 1992).
The social democratic consensus of the welfare state, was to experience a major overhaul following the 1979 general election, the conservative government favoured a ‘free market’ and therefore wished to promote self-help and personal enterprise and less dependency on the state (Giddens, 2006). To accomplish such goals, a collection of welfare reforms were introduced, namely, the ‘Social Security Act 1988’, these reforms ranged simple cuts in benefits for instance housing or child and the privatisation of certain sectors of the NHS, hospitals were encouraged to budget and organise their spending, markets were open to the public domain (Taylor, P. et al., 1995). The government strongly believed these measures would enable the public to have a larger choice and a service excellence, though critics argue differently ‘internal markets’ lessen the quality of service, while equally stratifying the system (Giddens, 2006).
The newly elected conservative government promptly cut the ties between the state and the union forces and quickly found itself in direct conflict (Fulcher & Schott, 2003). The government’s reaction was to introduce a number of governmental reforms, the Employment Acts 1980 and 1982 and the Trade Unions Act 1984, which undermined many of the ‘well established’ privileges of the Trade Unions (Green, 1987). Industrial action of the trade unions were now limited in diverse ways, secondary action were illegal, the rights to ‘picketing’ were redefined, pickets were now limited to six individuals and restricted to the workers workplace and ‘Flash’ strikes were curbed, in the measure, that all industrial actions should be put to a secret ballot of its members (Fulcher & Schott, 2003). It is important to underline that it was an integral element of Margaret Thatcher’s strategy to involve union members actively in the decisions relative to their employment (Subroto & Clarke, 2005). In undermining the ‘Trade Unions’, the result was not completely positive, for a large majority of the British workforce, found themselves with very little protection, while forced to work longer hours and tolerate the lowest wage compared to other nations (Wilson, 1992).
The government’s answer to tackling the inflation dilemma was ‘monetarism’, hence cutting back on public spending, through privatisation, free market and benefit reductions, and simultaneously controlling the quantity of capital in circulation. Although this perspective ‘succeeded’ in reducing the rate of inflation from 15% to 2.4% in 1986, it was at the expense of the worst recession during the last fifty years (Dearlove & Saunders, 1984). It cannot be denied, when analysing the figures concerning unemployment between1979 and 1982/3, there was a massive increase, reaching just above the three million individuals, these levels were ‘tolerated’ by the conservative government simply to combat the raising levels of inflation (Moon, 1983). As the government put little effort in to correcting the problem of unemployment, believing it was better left in the hands of the ‘Labour Market’, with the arrival of mass unemployment, the government felt threaten, and worried that public opinion would weaken its credibility, quickly established a number of diverse proposals, which aimed to reduce the number of individuals becoming unemployed, especially amongst ‘school leavers’ and the younger members of the population (Moon & Richardson, 1985).
When analysing the information provided throughout this composition, it was difficult to judge the impact of ‘Thatcherism’ on society negatively or positively, as for certain the ‘Thatcher Years’ provided them with the tools of improving their ‘life chances’, while other individuals were seen to be left on the ‘touch line’. Even though the measures submitted during the Thatcher administration were aimed to incite the nation as a whole, realistically only the upper working class, petty bourgeoisie and the middle class seem to profit. If one was to attempt to summarise ‘Thatcherism’, the most appropriate words would be ‘Recession’, Recovery’ and ‘Regression’.
Bibliography
Dearlove, J. & Saunders, P. (1984) Introduction to British Politics 3rd Edition. New York: Blackwell Publishers Limited.
Edgell, S. & Duke, V. (1991) A Measure of Thatcherism: A Sociology of Britain in the 1990’s. London: HarperCollins Academic.
Fulcher, J. & Scott, J. (2003) Sociology 2nd Edition. United States: Oxford University Press.
Gamble, A. (1988) The Free Economy and the Strong State: The Politics of Thatcherism. London: MacMillan Education Limited.
Gewirtz, S. et al. (1995) Markets, Choice and Equity in Education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Giddens, A. (2006) Sociology 5th Edition. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Green, D. (1987) The New Right: The Counter Revolution in Political, Economic and Social Thought. Sussex: Wheatsheaf Books Limited.
Moon, J. (1983) Unemployment in the UK: Government policies in Perspective. Strathclyde Papers on Government and Politics, No 6. Glasgow: University of Strathclyde, Department of Politics.
Moon, J.W. & Richardson, J.J. (1985) Unemployment in the UK: Politics and Policies. Aldershot: Gower Publishing Company Limited.
Taylor, P. et al. (1995) Sociology in Focus. United Kingdom: Causeway Press Limited.
Subroto, R. & Clarke, J. (2005) Margaret Thatcher’s Revolution: How it happened and What it meant. London: Continuum.
Wilson, E. (1992) A Very British Miracle: The Failure of Thatcherism. London: Pluto Press.
Word Count: 1275