Current scholarship generally acknowledges that art does not exist

Authors Avatar

Current scholarship generally acknowledges that art does not exist in a vacuum. Rather, art is an expression of the culture which creates it, revealing common beliefs, aspirations, and feelings. Within the vein of "cultural art history" the true nature of ancient Egypt has become the focus of much questioning. Much has been said regarding this ancient civilization within the context of the continent of Africa. The focus has not been merely geographic—although some scholars contend that the physical location of Egypt has been all but overlooked. At the core of this controversy is the issue of ethnicity and culture. What was the identity of the people who built and populated ancient Egypt?1

Many scholars decry the separation of Egyptology from the study of sub-Saharan, so-called "black" Africa. Others continue to uphold a view of Egypt as an essentially "white" society and thus the basis of Western culture. No matter the outcome, this dialogue has led to a fruitful re-examination of the past, as well as a greater understanding of the art and culture of Egypt. While we cannot be certain of the ancient Egyptian skin tone, we have come to recognize the fundamental nature of a people who perceived their world as consisting of more than a physical reality.

In order to understand Egypt, we must recognize that Egyptian art is primarily conceptual and symbolic in nature, serving to encode cultural information. Symbolism pervades all aspects of Egyptian art from method to material.2 The seemingly regimented system of symbolism was a means of interpreting life from the Creation to the Afterlife, as well as the perpetual struggle between creative and destructive forces.

For a more complete understanding of Egyptian art, it is helpful to consider the concepts which defined the culture and shaped their world. In the Egyptian cosmic view there existed before all else a state termed Nun, which can be likened to the primordial ocean, the infinite source of all creation. The Nun represented the indefinable and inherently unknowable, that which was beyond human reckoning. It was imagined as "a swampy mire, a seething primal cradle in which lived four couples of serpents and frogs" whose names translate as ‘the initial waters,’ ‘inertia,’ ‘spatial infinity,’ ‘the darkness,’ and ‘That which is hidden.’"3 

It was from the Nun that the Supreme Being was believed to have emerged, to have "created" himself. The creation was then related in terms of human genealogy to the various stages of creation undertaken by different entities. Shu and Tefnut, representing Space in its dual aspects, male and female, were of the first generation. They in turn "engendered Geb and Nut"—earth and sky, who "gave birth to Osiris, Horus, Seth, Isis, and Nepthys and they "gave birth to the multitudes of this world."4 

In another version, the creation was understood in its first state as metaphysical, attributed to Atum. On the spectrum, creation progressed each step closer toward matter. Myth often relates the story of Ptah, the divine blacksmith, who "brought materialization to the entities created by Atum." And, to Khnum, the divine potter, who modeled men and things from clay on his potter’s wheel.5 

Join now!

It is within this framework that the Egyptians conceived of what it meant to be human. A distinction was made between the aspects of a human being of that which was eternal and that which was subject to cycles of death and rebirth. According to funerary texts, humans are composed of a mortal body, called the "kha," and three immortal elements known as the "akh," "ba," and "ka." These have been translated as the spirit, soul, and double. More current interpretation assigns a less specified role for each entity. Regardless of the translation, an understanding of the concept of creation ...

This is a preview of the whole essay