• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assessment for PA

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

For our assessment we performed two acts from the play "Blood wedding". Act one was performed using Stanislavski method of naturalism and act three was performed using Artuads method. From applying the Stanislavski rules to my own style of acting I thought will be challenging because when I perform I generally over exaggerate my movements. I realised that I did this therefore was able to improve my naturalistic performance by applying the IF rule to my own performance of "blood wedding". From researching a lot about Stanislavski I understand why he created such rules and techniques of naturalistic style of acting and if he had not of produced his techniques we could still be living in a mechanical acting world. In order to apply the Stanislavski technique to our own work I researched his method further. Stanislavski said an actor needs: good will, absolute peace of mind, attention, and fearlessness. ...read more.

Middle

This is in contrast with Artauds method of theatre. Artaud was anxious to make every detail as powerful and as meaningful as possible. The choreographed acting, the amplified sound and the extreme mood created by the lighting all contributed to the overall intention: drawing the audience into the action for a sensory experience. Applying this method of acting to our assessment was going to be fun but hard work. We decided to have our audience placed in the centre with their eyes shut. Us the actors would therefore be performing around them. Having your eyes shut in any situation where other people are around can be intimidating let alone with noise and flashing lights. I found this method of acting fun and easy to perform as it was over the top and you got to have fun with it and didn't have to restrict yourself and the audience may feel more involved as they are in the centre. ...read more.

Conclusion

This could have perhaps made our characters more believable to the audience but we did sustain our role of the character throughout. The subject matter was dealt with in an appropriate way and the emotions that were explored by the performer were realistic. Individual character analysis. Ruth performed "Miss Julie" using Artauds method: She sustained a good focus throughout the performance and managed to keep her concentration although she was playing such a dramatic character. She created a character that the audience could sympathise with. It became a very emotional piece of drama to engage. Her facial expression was very interesting and added great depth to her performance. She could have projected her voice slightly louder so the audience could understand her throughout as at some points in the performance it became hard to hear what she was saying and therefore did affect her performance. Overall Ruth made her performance emotional for the audience to watch and was quite touching, you got a real sense of realness and she became the character. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Plays section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Plays essays

  1. Plot and Subpolt of Miss Julie

    She says the Count will die. And Jean's family line will end in the orphanage, gutter, and jail. ==> Kristin enters, dressed for church and carrying a hymn-book. Miss Julie throws herself into her arms, to help against Jean. Kristin refuses.

  2. Film Studies The Studio System

    When vaudeville singing star Al Jolsen introduced a tune with, "Wait a minute. Wait a minute. You ain't heard nothing yet," audiences shrieked in delight. From that moment on, there didn't seem to be any going back to the days of silent film.

  1. Comparative Study of Offstage Action in The Cherry Orchard and Miss Julie

    The audience is made aware when the action occurs. Narration of the past-sometimes known as character reflection-serves the primary purpose of informing the audience of pertinent background information. This can enlighten the audience to the behavior of a character, allow the audience to better understand a character, or give the audience a more integral perspective.

  2. Detail your understanding of the Given Circumstances and the Magic 'If' in the Stanislavski ...

    personality and known character traits). He/she must consider the time period or time of day in which the performance is set, as well as show an understanding of the themes and issues raised by a scripted or devised performance. It is also important that the actor has an awareness of

  1. In the light of your study of Stanislavski and after seeing Miss Julie how ...

    Her movements should be very swift, and she should constantly be moving around, making herself busy, yet achieving nothing, reflecting a theme of the play. This will create humour for the audience, as they will see her fussing over everything, yet doing nothing.

  2. How did your role emerge and how was it communicated?

    our own ideas as to how we wanted the play to develop. I think the hardest thing that we had to get over was the inherent need to control. We never once sat down and talked about how we thought we were doing or how we could improve the play,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work