• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

benefits and costs of Government Intervention which aims to make the distribution of income CONSIDERABLY more equal.

Extracts from this document...


Assess the economic benefits and costs of Government Intervention which aims to make the distribution of income CONSIDERABLY more equal. Market failure occurs when the free market fails to allocate resources in the most efficient manner and therefore the government intervened in order to correct this market failure. Income is a flow of earnings generated or received over a period of time. Income inequality is often seen as market failure and thus there are many different approaches that the government can take in order to try to redistribute income more equally. They could simply introduce welfare-to-work strategies or increase benefits in kind; however, to make a more dramatic impact they would have to change the welfare benefit structure or tax structure. Welfare benefits are cash payments to those entitled to it, also called transfer payments. ...read more.


Indirect taxes are taxes on consumption. They are regressive, so as income falls, a higher proportion is paid, which is deemed to be unfair. In order to narrow income inequality, the government could raise taxes for higher income earners. By raising taxes, the government is able to redistribute income by spending the money on education, training and buildings etc that people on lower incomes can use - it is redistributed in an indirect way. However this may have the effect of people working less due to the back-bending labour supply curve as shown below. The supply curve above shows the optimum level of taxation with the maximum level of hours worked. If the level of tax is risen, then output will fall, and also if the level of taxation falls, due to the theory of the substitution effect. ...read more.


Therefore the most significant benefit of increasing welfare benefits to narrow income distribution is that in the short term, it will be effective, however the greatest disadvantage is that in the long term it will not be effective as is likely to act as a disincentive to work. The greatest advantage of changing the UK tax structure to narrow income distribution is that it is a long term solution. By lowering income tax to the lowest band of income earners will significantly increase their income and thus narrow distribution. However, by lowering income tax, the government may have to raise indirect, regressive taxes, which will not help the lower income earners, taking up more of their disposable income. Having weighed up the benefits and costs of both methods, a change of the tax structure in the UK is the best long term solution to equalise the distribution of income in the UK with the least amount of costs to society. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Markets & Managing the Economy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Markets & Managing the Economy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Supermarkets in UK - An oligopily

    5 star(s)

    Asda and Sainsbury are among companies that have agreed to pay near record fines of 116 million after admitting they fixed the price of milk, cheese and butter between 2002 and 2003. The supermarkets claimed they joined forces to help raise the price of milk to farmers who were suffering

  2. Micro economics environment - Government intervention

    it is felt that fairness may be ignored therefore the government intervene e.g. monopoly There is also reason for them not to intervene such as there are two main government parties, the labour party and then there is the conservative's party.

  1. Is the Government to Blame for Higher Petrol Prices?

    The Government often cites the main reason for taxing petrol is to ensure the true cost to the environment in reflected in the price paid and to reduce consumption of the good. The tax imposed upon petrol (fuel duty) would try to raise the Marginal Private Cost curve towards the Marginal Social Cost curve (diagram F)

  2. Assess the costs and benefits of an extension of the tube line to Croydon

    At price P2 and quantity Q2, the level (quantity) of disruption has been decreased by increasing the cost of disruption (most likely through some form of financial penalty enforced by the government). It is at this point that marginal social cost and marginal social benefit meet (i.e.

  1. At What Level (if any) Should Government Intervene to Promote the Competitiveness of Businesses?

    IT infrastructure), and administration, etc, which benefit firms operating businesses conveniently and efficiently. However, the role of government should not exceed the market, or in other worlds, government should not provide excessive support and protection for its firms. For example, 'picking winners' can not be a consistently sensible policy because

  2. What Are The Effects Of Tescos Oligopolistic Market Structure, On Both Consumers And Producers?

    since The Office of Fair Trading have no reason to alter figures to support Tesco. The Office of Fair Trading found that real prices for food had fallen 7.3% between 2000 and 2005, as seen in the above source. In an article in The Financial Times Richard Hyman, chairman of

  1. Measuring National Income

    What are the different uses of national income statistics? Governments measure the total output of the country to assess the performance of the economy. They use national income statistics to assess whether the economy is growing and doing well or experiencing a decline. The first use of national income statistics is the most common one, which is to indicate the standard of living of a nation.

  2. Using the data and your economic knowledge, evaluate the view that the benefits resulting ...

    Also people are more likely to have a job as it would be the same as everyone else and far more worthwhile, as benefits would be far less. The inequality that would be removed is shown in Extract C which tells us how much the top 1% earns after taxes

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work