• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Does a Higher GDP necessarily cause a Higher Standard Of Living?

Extracts from this document...


Does a Higher GDP necessarily cause a Higher Standard Of Living? One of the uses of GDP is to measure economic well being of a country's population through their standard of living. When using GDP, it is necessary to use Real GDP per Capita. Personally I don't believe that a higher GDP causes a higher standard of living, although it might do for the higher echelons of society. There are many reasons why I believe this: Firstly, national GDP figures hide the regional disparities and variations in unemployment, output and incomes. IN addition, there also exists within regions various unemployment black spots which are contrasted with areas of prosperity. This is shown in the example of the UK - GDP is on average �15,000, while in a survey from MORI in 1997 it states that 12 million people lived in poverty as they earned under �175 a week (after tax) ...read more.


There is evidence to show that during the years 1979 and 1993, the poorest decile's real income actually fell and as a result their standard of living would have decreased, while at the same time the general living standards have increased for the richest. Therefore GDP figures do not show the distribution of income and wealth - they nay be unevenly distributed among the population (e.g. in Saudi Arabia - small minority hold the whole country's wealth). Also, whilst national prosperity may be rising, relative poverty may also be rinsing. GDP figures tell us little about the quality of goods and services being produced. Therefore, a situation could arise, where the quality of the goods is slowly getting worse and worse, while at the same time the sales could remain if there was little ...read more.


consumer expenditure). The result of these goods is that they can create negative externality effects which constitute a reduction on standards of living. Therefore in conclusion, GDP is not a good way to measure standard of living, and there are a number of better ways which can be used - e.g. the crime rate of a country/region, the suicide rate, divorce rate, social welfare statistics - e.g. number of patients per doctor, infant mortality rates, average calorie intake, average education attainment at different age levels etc.. and also the amount of pollution ( although this, like other negative externalities in the economy are very difficult to put a monetary value on, Therefore, a higher GDP does not necessarily cause a higher of living. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Macroeconomics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Macroeconomics essays

  1. Budget 2004-05 and Economic Analysis of Pakistan

    * The government announced a package deal for the farmers. * Under the micro credit scheme, financing extended showed a 27.3% * increase to Rs.47.9 billion. * The impressive 17.1% growth by large scale manufacturing was mainly because of the significant growth by automobile, electronics, and food group (vegetable ghee, cooking oil and sugar).

  2. How have the Rates of Inflation in the UK Changed Since the Monetary Policy ...

    The UK has had a very strong exchange rate this has curbed demand pressure for cheap foreign imports and led to lower costs of production. The supply side reforms in the 1980's and early 1990's; particularly the ones in the labour market have lower supply side costs and reduce the pressure of wage inflation.

  1. Comparing the effects of immigration on GDP in Malaysia, Japan and South Africa.

    into the country in the year 2004 where the total number of immigrants was 2,481,308 million which means the percentage change was 22.82%. In line with the increase in GDP, the unemployment has also decreased by 0.12%. Therefore, we can conclude that Japan's economy in the year 2004 was growing.

  2. Compare and contrast the various methods of dealing with the problem of monopoly.

    elevation of wholesale gas and electricity prices (costs which they cannot absorb), but is this form of a tacit agreement (where firms informally signal price decision to other firms, to suggest they copy)? While it is proven that the barrel of oil did rise to approximately $150 per barrel, the

  1. Report on Austrlian Workplace Relations

    come from workplace relations, such as increased costs to deal with any problems that arise between employees and employers, and increased costs that come from a high minimal wage. However with the recent weakening of some policies of workplace, output has increased and costs have decreased creating an increase in productivity.

  2. National income and GDP.

    UK has historical good record in the 1960s and 1950s compare to other decades. But since 1960's UK's performance has been inferior to main competitors. UK's growth rate of GDP was 2.9% in the 1960s, which was lowest compare to other main competitors.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work