• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Does a Higher GDP necessarily cause a Higher Standard Of Living?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Does a Higher GDP necessarily cause a Higher Standard Of Living? One of the uses of GDP is to measure economic well being of a country's population through their standard of living. When using GDP, it is necessary to use Real GDP per Capita. Personally I don't believe that a higher GDP causes a higher standard of living, although it might do for the higher echelons of society. There are many reasons why I believe this: Firstly, national GDP figures hide the regional disparities and variations in unemployment, output and incomes. IN addition, there also exists within regions various unemployment black spots which are contrasted with areas of prosperity. This is shown in the example of the UK - GDP is on average �15,000, while in a survey from MORI in 1997 it states that 12 million people lived in poverty as they earned under �175 a week (after tax) ...read more.

Middle

There is evidence to show that during the years 1979 and 1993, the poorest decile's real income actually fell and as a result their standard of living would have decreased, while at the same time the general living standards have increased for the richest. Therefore GDP figures do not show the distribution of income and wealth - they nay be unevenly distributed among the population (e.g. in Saudi Arabia - small minority hold the whole country's wealth). Also, whilst national prosperity may be rising, relative poverty may also be rinsing. GDP figures tell us little about the quality of goods and services being produced. Therefore, a situation could arise, where the quality of the goods is slowly getting worse and worse, while at the same time the sales could remain if there was little ...read more.

Conclusion

consumer expenditure). The result of these goods is that they can create negative externality effects which constitute a reduction on standards of living. Therefore in conclusion, GDP is not a good way to measure standard of living, and there are a number of better ways which can be used - e.g. the crime rate of a country/region, the suicide rate, divorce rate, social welfare statistics - e.g. number of patients per doctor, infant mortality rates, average calorie intake, average education attainment at different age levels etc.. and also the amount of pollution ( although this, like other negative externalities in the economy are very difficult to put a monetary value on, Therefore, a higher GDP does not necessarily cause a higher of living. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Macroeconomics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Macroeconomics essays

  1. Comparing the effects of immigration on GDP in Malaysia, Japan and South Africa.

    The second high GDP comes from manufacturing sector, following by mining and quarrying, and the last but not least, agriculture sector. The intake of foreign workers has helped these sectors to perform well every year. Hence, this has made those sectors to have a high dependency levels on immigrants workers.

  2. Budget 2004-05 and Economic Analysis of Pakistan

    has increased from 11.6 percent to 13.8 percent in the same period. The construction and transport sectors accounted for 6.1 percent and 5.9 percent workforce respectively in 2004. About 3.72 million people in the labour force were estimated to be unemployed in 2004 compared to 3.65 million in 2003.

  1. Compare and contrast the various methods of dealing with the problem of monopoly.

    Having said this, the regulatory body has the power to split up a monopoly into multiple, smaller, firms if it deems this as necessary. This can be good for the market, as this will open up it to more competition, and possibly lower barriers to entry for other firms.

  2. Report on Austrlian Workplace Relations

    come from workplace relations, such as increased costs to deal with any problems that arise between employees and employers, and increased costs that come from a high minimal wage. However with the recent weakening of some policies of workplace, output has increased and costs have decreased creating an increase in productivity.

  1. National income and GDP.

    UK has historical good record in the 1960s and 1950s compare to other decades. But since 1960's UK's performance has been inferior to main competitors. UK's growth rate of GDP was 2.9% in the 1960s, which was lowest compare to other main competitors.

  2. Governments set economic objectives - Discuss the relative importance of each of these objectives ...

    The government now increases aggregate demand which causes a fall in unemployment and an increase in the rate of inflation from 0 - 5% i.e. the point A move along PC1 to point X on the PC1 curve. If workers are suffering from money illusion, the point X will move back down the curve back to point A.

  1. Do higher wage cause higher prices, or do price rises cause wage rises

    However, since the economy is now in equilibrium again there seems no reason for further inflation. The only way that this could lead to inflation, rather than a one-off increase in prices, is if aggregate demand keeps increasing. This can only happen if the government allows the quantity of money supplied to constantly increase.

  2. How have the Rates of Inflation in the UK Changed Since the Monetary Policy ...

    The cost of essential raw materials, particularly imported ones, cause cost-push inflation such as what happened in the 1970's when the price of oil rose dramatically. An increase in food prices caused by a bad harvest either in the UK or in the countries where we import most of our food.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work