• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Does a Higher GDP necessarily cause a Higher Standard Of Living?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Does a Higher GDP necessarily cause a Higher Standard Of Living? One of the uses of GDP is to measure economic well being of a country's population through their standard of living. When using GDP, it is necessary to use Real GDP per Capita. Personally I don't believe that a higher GDP causes a higher standard of living, although it might do for the higher echelons of society. There are many reasons why I believe this: Firstly, national GDP figures hide the regional disparities and variations in unemployment, output and incomes. IN addition, there also exists within regions various unemployment black spots which are contrasted with areas of prosperity. This is shown in the example of the UK - GDP is on average �15,000, while in a survey from MORI in 1997 it states that 12 million people lived in poverty as they earned under �175 a week (after tax) ...read more.

Middle

There is evidence to show that during the years 1979 and 1993, the poorest decile's real income actually fell and as a result their standard of living would have decreased, while at the same time the general living standards have increased for the richest. Therefore GDP figures do not show the distribution of income and wealth - they nay be unevenly distributed among the population (e.g. in Saudi Arabia - small minority hold the whole country's wealth). Also, whilst national prosperity may be rising, relative poverty may also be rinsing. GDP figures tell us little about the quality of goods and services being produced. Therefore, a situation could arise, where the quality of the goods is slowly getting worse and worse, while at the same time the sales could remain if there was little ...read more.

Conclusion

consumer expenditure). The result of these goods is that they can create negative externality effects which constitute a reduction on standards of living. Therefore in conclusion, GDP is not a good way to measure standard of living, and there are a number of better ways which can be used - e.g. the crime rate of a country/region, the suicide rate, divorce rate, social welfare statistics - e.g. number of patients per doctor, infant mortality rates, average calorie intake, average education attainment at different age levels etc.. and also the amount of pollution ( although this, like other negative externalities in the economy are very difficult to put a monetary value on, Therefore, a higher GDP does not necessarily cause a higher of living. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Macroeconomics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Macroeconomics essays

  1. Comparing the effects of immigration on GDP in Malaysia, Japan and South Africa.

    It is because there are more people working in the services industry as the services industry has contributed a lot to the GDP which means there are a lot of job vacancies in the industry. From here, we can see that Japan was maintaining their economy growth well and successfully

  2. How have the Rates of Inflation in the UK Changed Since the Monetary Policy ...

    The only figures can be questioned are those for consumer confidence and to a lesser extent real disposable income as confidence is a difficult issue to put a numerical value on an disposable income will vary so much over the country that some economist feel they don't prove very much.

  1. Budget 2004-05 and Economic Analysis of Pakistan

    During July-March 2003-04, money supply grew by 12.3 percent as against the target of 11.1 percent and last year's growth of 12 percent in the same period. Unlike previous two years, when the bulk of the monetary expansion resulted from a strong build-up in the net foreign assets of the

  2. Governments set economic objectives - Discuss the relative importance of each of these objectives ...

    Despite some disadvantages, the government pushes for economic growth [innovation, research and development], etc. Thus, the government can use two policies to encourage growth: interventionist policies or the free market approach. Some economists believe that the market mechanism is unlikely to lead to optimal rates of economic growth.

  1. National income and GDP.

    Japan had highest growth rate in this period. From 1971 to1980, the growth rate of GDP in UK was still at bottom among the main industrial counties. Japan's growth rate is again at top. Situation for the UK's growth rate of GDP has got better since 1980s.

  2. Compare and contrast the various methods of dealing with the problem of monopoly.

    where the regulator is only dropping suggestions to the firms; they are not forcing any actions upon them. Despite preaches by Fuel Poverty organisations and EnergyWatch (the regulator), prices are still not falling at the rate that they should be.

  1. Report on Austrlian Workplace Relations

    However there is debate on issues of unfair dismissals and employees forced to resign. This has caused many recent changes making policies less stringent in lead up of political elections Impacts on the Economy The economy of Australia is directly affected by Workplace Relations.

  2. Do higher wage cause higher prices, or do price rises cause wage rises

    However, unemployment is now above its natural rate and therefore wages rise. This increase in wages results in the short run aggregate supply curve falling, from SRAS0 to SRAS1. Real GDP falls back to its long run equilibrium level at Y0, and prices rise again to P2.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work