• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

This case study will examine the regulatory failure of antitrust laws in relation to the prosecution of IBM corporations

Extracts from this document...


Introduction: The power of the government to regulate or prevent any form of white collar crimes is very limited. This is especially true of criminal act such as antitrust violations. This case study will examine the regulatory failure of antitrust laws in relation to the prosecution of IBM corporations. The ambiguity of Section 2 of the Sherman Act can be seen to contribute to the failure to criminally prosecute any corporations for such violations. Regulatory failure in brief: Allegations of violations of antitrust laws by IBM are still presently presented before the courts but they have never been criminal charged with any criminal violations (Fisse 1983: 197). This is just some examples of the failure of regulations in antitrust laws that has failed to prosecute or criminally charged larger corporations with non compliancy associated with the antitrust laws. This can be contributed to the wider definition of antitrust laws and the difficulty in proving such violations have occurred. This is clearly evident in the Section 2 of the Sherman Act, which emphasize the need to provide prove for "monopolization" and the intent. The courts have traditionally given these regulations broad definitions in defining what has been violated (Bequai 1979: 96). ...read more.


The U.S. antitrust law implies that "monopolization" under Section 2 of Sherman Act is illegal if offender took anti-competitive actions to acquire, preserve or enhance its monopoly. For "monopolization" plaintiff have to prove that the defendant 1. Processed market power 2. Wilfully acquired or maintained this monopoly power as distinguished from acquisition through superior product, business acumen, or historical accident (Bequai 1979: 97). This also raises problems in determining what amount constituted requisite monopolistic power. It is believe that company that has control over 90 percent of the market can be said to have monopolistic power over the sector's economy. In some cases U.S. Supreme Court held that 60 percent control is sufficient, while other courts believe that 75 percent is enough (Bequai 1979: 97). Much of this determination depends on the facts of the case, the market itself, and the product involved (Bequai 1979: 97). For "monopolization" to be illegal under U.S. antitrust law, it is not sufficient enough for a company to "monopolize" a market by possessing large portion of the shares (enough if is 100 percent).Violations of Section 2 of the Sherman Act requires evidences showing that the means employed, if successful would have been sufficient to bring about monopoly control. ...read more.


Another factor which contributed to the failure of prosecuting violators is the decision to hand over jurisdiction of antitrust matters to the Attorney General to purse through the means of the courts and common laws. The courts is knowingly to exhibited several character tics that will contribute to the failure of these regulations. The courts have the ability to discriminate among particular cases, the pluralistic mode of reasoning, and the tendency toward incremental, and the adversary system. These characteristics permit the assertion of the principle of public control while minimizing the violence that control would do to the principle of private decision making in the economic sector (Jamieson 1994: 29-30). Corporations may use political power to ensure favourable antitrust legislation or positive decision by regulatory agencies (Jamieson 1994: 36).Clearly in the case against IBM, the Attorney General lawyer William F. Baxter has the final said in relation to this case. Conclusion: The Section 2 of the Sherman Act failed to stop or prevent larger corporations such as IBM from attempting to monopolize the sector. Even after all the antitrust lawsuits made by private entities and the government against IBM, this has not affected the profit of IBM products as it still remains one of the largest computer corporations today. The failure to criminally prosecute such violations has contributed to this continuing success of IBM. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Markets & Managing the Economy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Markets & Managing the Economy essays

  1. Explain why environmental pollution is regarded as a source of market failure? Evaluate three ...

    a tax pushes up the cost for a producer and thus reduces the supply. A further advantage is that a tax also creates greater incentives for the producer to reduce its negative externality. The disadvantage of using taxes is that they are aggressive; this means that they take a great percentage of poor peoples income.

  2. Monopoly. The following is going to discuss that monopoly is always against the ...

    Since then, it will raise the price. The existing weaknesses, in monopoly, are clear to against public interest, but it can still take advantage of its potential strength to serve public interest well. If assume that the cost curves are different under perfect competition and monopoly, the cost may be lower under monopoly.

  1. 'Although corporate pricing decisions are influenced by many different factors, fundamentally prices will reflect ...

    The natural monopoly case originally provided a justification for utilities such as water, electricity, gas and telecommunications to be managed by the government: to avoid the problems of unfair pricing. Privatisation, however, has recently altered this perspective. Nowadays, governments structure the public - private sector divide in ways that encourage

  2. what is economics

    collected by means of: o Sample surveys of consumers (price and YED) o Past records from within a company (PES) o Competitor analysis (XED) * Given the nature of how the data is collected, it is necessary to appreciate that: o The data gathered will be estimates, since the data

  1. What are the origins of the Pension Crisis and what can be done to ...

    60 taking out a similar annuity could expect an income of just �650 per annum (The Observer). One way that individual can increase their annuity rates is to work beyond the traditional retirement age, thereby postponing the purchase of their annuity.

  2. Communism - A Failed Russian System

    The Soviet Union was formed after the two uprisings in Imperial Russia, in March and October 1917, together known as the Russian revolution. After this revolution, the super power known as the Soviet Union was to be created. It would play a major role in world politics for just over 70 years before collapsing into itself.

  1. Case study of Singapore E-Government.

    Plan prescribed the broad directions of ICT deployment with five strategic thrusts and six programs. Diagram 2; Illustrates the 6 programs in the e-Government strategic framework and the 5 strategic thrusts 2.1 Government to Citizens (G2C) Individuals can interact online with the Government on a vast range of matters.

  2. What Are The Effects Of Tescos Oligopolistic Market Structure, On Both Consumers And Producers?

    In geographical areas with no major competitors, they were selling products at higher products than in areas where they faced stronger competition. The submission by the Association of Convenience Stores to the Competition Commission grocery market inquiry in 2006 found that such practices were continuing.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work