• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Coriolanus, write a critical appreciation of the following passage, (Act 1, Scene 1, 146-210) showing what it contributes to your understanding of Martius (Coriolanus).

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Paying close attention to language and tone, write a critical appreciation of the following passage, (Act 1, Scene 1, 146-210) showing what it contributes to your understanding of Martius (Coriolanus). Coriolanus can be thought of as the story of a heroic soldier whose downfall is caused by pride and inflexibility of character. Shakespeare found the story of Coriolanus (Caius Martius) in the writings of the Roman historian, Plutarch. There, he read that Caius Martius ?was so choleric and impatient that he would yield to no living creature, which made him churlish, uncivil, and altogether unfit for any man?s conversation?. In this passage, Shakespeare provides Martius with language to match Plutarch description. Tone in this passage also effectively contributes to the understanding of Martius? (Coriolanus?) character. Martius? first entry, introduces a different kind of patrician among all ? the man hardened by battle to an unyielding rigour, which he maintains in public life. It is clear that Menenius and Martius aredramatic foils. Menenius is wise, has a great wit and is willing to play a part, to talk and flatter his way out of difficult situations. Martius is hot-tempered, full of disdain and has no skills with which to deal with the common masses. ...read more.

Middle

This sentiment may represent the illogicality of a rampaging crowd, but no less illogical is Coriolanus? way of answering their grievances and their accusations against the patricians : ?Would the nobility lay aside their ruth, and let me use my sword, I?d make a quarry with thousands of these quarterd?d slaves, as high as I could pick my lance.? Animal imageries in this passage contribute to the understanding of Martius? character. Lines 147-71 are a tirade of scornful abuse against the plebeians which contains many antitheses: peace/war, lions/hares, foxes/geese. These intensify and deepens imaginative effect, creating and giving insight into Martius? feelings and thoughts, thus we are able to gain impression of Martius? character. When Caius Martius erupts into the play at line 146, Immediately the pace and tone of the scene changes from passive to active, his contempt of the plebeians ironically paralleling their earlier criticism of him, as he accuses them of being made ?proud? and describes them as ?curs?. Within his first speeches the audience are given a clear demonstration of his arrogant contempt for the fickle citizens that he regards as the diseased parts of the body that is Rome, his anger at the thought of giving power to those he considers unworthy of it as cowards ...read more.

Conclusion

Martius is an inflexible, arrogant heroic warrior, whose courage and perseverance win every match on the battlefield. He is hot-tempered and is also filled with pride. He disrespects the commoners, feeling they are not as smart as the patricians and are unfit to even be represented in the government. Since they do not share his values, Martius refuses to hide his dislike for them. He is always brutally honest and speaks his mind. He believes the commoners are inconstant and cowardly, and he clearly tells them so. These are effectively portrayed by Shakespeare through language and tone. Martius? language matches Plutarch?s description of Martius. His tones when speaking to the plebeians are of a sneering, dismissive ridicule, menace and ironic tone. Everyone, it seems, has an opinion to express about Caius Martius, and those opinions, appropriately for this play, are conflicting. There is very little soul-searching or questioning through soliloquy in Caius Martius Coriolanus. Our knowledge and understanding of the man, therefore, relies on what is said about him and by him, and through observation of his actions and interaction with others in the play. Nazihatul Afifah Bte Hj Abd Hamid PU2B ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other works section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other works essays

  1. The contrast between Hotspur and Hal is the main theme in Henry IV part ...

    Welsh mountains" This is too much for Hotspur who flies into one of his tempers and exclaims "revolted Mortimer". He tries to explain that Mortimer fought bravely for the king "Those mouth wounds, which valiantly he took, When on the gentle Severn's sedgy bank".

  2. To what extent does the tragedy of Titus Andronicus unfold from the protagonist and ...

    obsessive state and his lack of regard for his family makes him appear yet again as selfish and uncaring. The saying goes that we are our own worst enemies, something we see in Titus as many characteristics of Titus are reflected in his enemy, Tamora; he is a strong leader, a protective parent and incredibly proud, as is Tamora.

  1. In his opening soliloquy, the true nature of Richards character is revealed, his villainy ...

    The result of using low-key lighting has a pronounced effect on the audiences' view of Pacino in the play - as his face is almost always hidden in the shadows, a sense of mystery is created around his character. Interestingly, the contrast of the greenery visible through the windows to

  2. Richard III, explore the way Shakespeare shapes an audience's response to Richard

    In addition, the audience are reminded of Richard's scheming and duplicitous behaviour due to the repetition of the words 'nay' and 'but'. Not only could this convey Richard's two-faced character and convince the audience that he is play-acting, but it also gives the impression that his words have an effect

  1. Taking into consideration of the language and structure of the play, how would you ...

    After Richard's soliloquy Shakespeare introduces us to his brother Clarence, we learn that Richard has been plotting to turn his two brothers against each other. We also learn that Clarence has been sent to the Tower. Therefore we know Richard isn't wasting time.

  2. who in your opinion is the true hero of Henry the fourth part 1

    Hotspur quickly reverts to childish behaviour whereas by comparison Hal becomes mighty and noble. Having won the favor of the audience he is positioned perfectly to rise into the plays hero. From the beginning of the play the audience perceive Hal as a villain, in Act 1 Scene 1, the king rains abuse upon Hal's name.

  1. Does Coriolanus make mistakes or errors in judgement that lead to his downfall? If ...

    It is clear through his thinly veiled contempt for the people he is unsuited as he regards them as 'hares, geese', unworthy animals. Wholly unsuited for a career in politics due to his arrogance, brutal honesty, tactless manner and moreover his inability to conceal his true self and to pretend

  2. Write a dramatic monologue in the style of Aaron reflecting on the motivation for ...

    planning ahead and self belief in his words reflect his arrogant, self confident mind frame. ?Sociopath slays there own children?? I have used these exact words to debate on how a character of such pure evil can contrast to the hero of the play.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work