• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

King Lear. The seeds of tragedy are sewn in Act 1 scene 1. To what extent are the events inevitable with reference to the opening?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question: The seeds of tragedy are sewn in Act 1 scene 1. To what extent are the events inevitable with reference to the opening. According to Aristotle a tragedy should consist of a tragic hero; a character of noble status possessing a fatal flaw. He proposed that the hero's downfall should be a result of his own actions and that he should have a chance to learn from his mistakes during the play. Aristotle's theory of a tragic flaw is designed to allow the audience to engage with the hero, regardless of the character's higher status or power. This view also suggests that a tragedy is a play which causes pity and fear amongst the audience for the tragic hero; in Shakespearean tragedies the Hero's flaw is often lust or ambition, which an audience is able to identify with therefore the hero's demise causes the reader to sympathise with the character more. During Shakespearean time, king ship was considered to be granted by God. As a result it was believed that the down fall of a king would result in the destruction of society. Expanding on this further, a Shakespearean audience would have viewed the king as being incapable of making poor decisions therefore Lear's tragedy may have been considered as an 'accidental tragedy'. ...read more.

Middle

Psychologist, Sigmund Freud discussed, in his essay 'The Theme of three caskets' [1], the symbolism of Lear's daughters. He proposed that they represented the three fates of Greek myth. Cordelier symbolises, Atropos the goddess of death, so consequently by rejecting Cordelier Lear rejects death. Cordelier's reluctance to speak is associated with dumbness, which psychoanalysts interpret as a symbol of death in dreams [1]. This reference to death in the first scene emphasises that tragic events are unavoidable. Language in act one scene one foreshadows the events to occur, suggesting the inevitability of tragic events. Lear's downfall begins when he asks his daughters to show their love for him through language, the untrustworthiness of the language suggests the likelihood of tragedy. The noun 'nothing' is said several times in the opening. The word creates a feeling of emptiness; an emotion that causes Lear's madness, yet at the same time suggests that 'nothing' may be of more worth to Lear than everything. Gonerill and Regan say everything Lear wants to hear but Cordelier, who says 'nothing' is of more use to the king than his unworthy daughters. This also creates irony, as Lear is left with nothing in the end of the play and his life becomes meaningless. ...read more.

Conclusion

Gonerill and Regan abuse their power, but so does Edmund who is a male antagonist. This indicates, that perhaps Shakespeare isn't implying that women cannot cope with power, but that when authority is handed to those, that God doesn't wish it to be handed to, chaos and destruction is created. This further expresses the fact that king ship is granted by God. Some readers argue that the absence of a mother is what leads to the inevitability of tragic events. It is necessary for a mother figure in the play to ensure that Lear doesn't become an 'abusive patriarch' [2], as well as preventing Gonerill's, Regan's and Edmund's character from deteriorating. In conclusion to my essay it is important for the seeds of tragedy to be sewn in act 1 scene 1, as this provides the audience with a sense of the inevitability of tragic events keeping them engaged with the play. Further more, by foreshadowing tragic events in the opening, the play takes into account the perception of a good tragedy made by Aristotle. However, it could be argued that the seeds of tragedy in the opening are not necessary as this makes a tragic ending more unexpected and therefore the modern day reader may find this more exiting. Word count: 1562 ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level King Lear section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

The writer makes several potentially interesting statements, some of which are controversial, but does not develop them or explain them clearly to the reader.
Similarly, there is evidence of interesting background reading, but the ideas from these secondary sources are introduced too briefly to serve much purpose.
**

Marked by teacher Val Shore 01/01/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level King Lear essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How effectively does Shakespeare present Lear's loss of power in the play?

    4 star(s)

    His changing language throughout the course of the play highlights his loss of power and change of nature. As early as act one scene four, Lear's demands are not being met and his authority is not being recognised. In this scene Lear has to ask three times for someone to "call hither my fool".

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Villains in King Lear

    She also joins Goneril in pushing their elderly father out into the stormy night alone and without shelter or comfort, with the intent of causing him mortal harm.

  1. King Lear - A commentary on Edmund's soliloquy in Act I Scene ii.

    are continually being tested in the main play, as well as in the sup-plot. The way that Edmund says that his "services are bound" to nature suggests that he has accepted the life of a bastard, but wants to do something about it.

  2. King Lear as a Tragic Hero

    By seeing this image, we can feel pity about Lear at the end of the play. Lear and Perfection Aristotle contests that the tragic hero has to be a man "who is not eminently good and just, yet whose misfortune is brought about not by vice or depravity, but by some error or frailty."

  1. Explore the presentation of Edmund in 'King Lear'

    He shows a combative vigour, precisely expressed in 'the lusty stealth of nature' and in the belligerent questions which dominate his opening speech and encapsulate his rejection of moral standards. The words 'nature' and 'natural' are picked up again here; for Lear and Gloucester they represent behavioural norms, all that is part of the right order of things.

  2. How does Shakespeare present Edmund in King Lear?

    and because of this Edmund goes against the customs of his environment (through his manipulative and sly actions towards Edgar and Gloucester in Act 1 Scene 2 as well as Act 3 Scene 5). This disregard for tradition can be inferred from when Edmund states "Now, gods, stand up for bastards!"

  1. How does Shakespeare explore madness in King Lear in Act 3 Scene 2?

    This notion of Lear clinging onto his power in a state of, what the audience perceives as madness, is also depicted when Lear says ?death, traitor? to Kent. This phrase typifies a King?s command through the sharp, swift, simple sentence structure and lexis associated with power.

  2. How does Shakespeare create a sense of unease in Act 1 Scene 1 of ...

    The first few lines of the play establish King Lear?s subplot- Gloucester and his assumed patriarchal dominance and even apathy over his son. He brandishes him as ?illegitimate? and a ?bastard?, and that he ?blushes to acknowledge him?. Despite admitting that he loves him as much as his legitimate son

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work