Plath and Hughes wrote their last collections for different reasons, different audiences; there are no comparisons to be drawn between Ariel and Birthday Letters. Discuss.

Authors Avatar by heslop (student)

It is reasonable to read the two collections and immediately come to the conclusion that they are two separate pieces of work, as each collection appears to be written for different audiences and reasons. Ted writing his work as a reaction to Sylvia’s poems, with no intention of seeking fame or even an audience. In fact his book did not meet the wants of the public at all, expecting an insight about the role he played in Sylvia Plath’s suicide or, failing that, some insight into why she did what she did. However what they received was quite different, his first poem “Fulbright scholars” being a reflection on Hughes’ first impression of the young American scholars including Plath. The very start of the poem opens with a rhetorical question “ Where was it, in the Strand” suggesting uncertainty as to the location of the newspaper display. Not quite a sweeping insight to the death of Sylvia, the poem being more of middle finger to every critic. Ted’s rejection to the public’s wants can be seen in a review in the New York Observer. The article expressing his views on Birthday letters. He tells us “So that’s it ? Readers have waited three and a half decades to hear Ted Hughes make the earth shaking revelation that he left Sylvia Plath because she was disturbed by upsetting memories of her father ? What an anti-climax.” This confirming my previous point, suggesting that Birthday Letters was written without any thought of the general public.  Sylvia’s poetry on the other hand is more a plea for help, most poems being written in a confessional style with an audience in mind. In fact this an issue Ted takes up with her, being that her poetry is becoming more of  an attempt to seek fame getting in the way of her poetry. In “The Rabbit Catcher” Sylvia talks about her relationship with her ex-lover as analogous to that between a rabbit and the rabbit catcher of the title. In the last stanza the speaker sees a parallel between the rabbit catcher’s relationship to the rabbits and her ex lover’s relationship with her : “And we, too, had a relationship-/Tight wires between us/ Pegs too deep to uproot, and a mind like a ring/ Sliding shut on some quick thing/ The constriction killing me also. “ her the use of end rhyme  for the first time in the poem seems to emphasise her lover’s cruelty: “a mind like a ring/ sliding shut on some quick thing. “ Her use of the words like “killing” are evident throughout the whole poem, the final sentence revealing her last revelation of “killing” and “constriction” retrospectively accounting for the hysterical tone of the whole poem. This example showing her apparent profound problems with no attempt to hold anything back, here we can see that her writing is for the general audience with the use of extreme words most likely escalating her problems.  

There is also a difference to talked about in their use of tenses. Throughout Ariel we can see it characteristic of Plath to write in the first person perspective. Allowing the reader to relate more to her and make each poem seem conversational like and therefore can be seen to write in the hurry of the present after her divorce. As a result of this some, if not all of the poems come across as unprofessional with a lack of respect for those who will read it. Since she grew up during ww2 she used descriptions of the most atrocious people she could find, which were the Nazis, and in daddy we can see her use these powerful images. She even goes as far to draw parallel between Hitler and her These images include "your neat mustache / And your Aryan eye, bright blue. /Panzer-man, panzer-man, O You ----" in the ninth stanza and "Every woman adores a Fascist" in the tenth stanza. Here showing no respect for those who experienced the war and the holocaust, even stating that “every women” should adore a Fascist, a horrible thing to say since he was a man responsible for the killing of millions of people. Later on in the poem she writes "Chuffing me off like a Jew. / A Jew to Dachau, Auschwitz, Belsen. / I began to talk like a Jew. / I think I may well be a Jew." Stanza eight also says "With my gypsy ancestress and my weird luck / And my Taroc pack and my Taroc pack / I might be a bit of a Jew." Her Plath uses the images of the Jews to show how she is victimised, trapped and confined, however she is naive in thinking her problems are on the same scale as those who were victims of the Nazis. Ariel was very much written in the hast of the present, and Plaths emotions appear to pour out leaving language behind. This can be seen through the often use of confused syntax, for example “Put your foot, your root” which highlights the speed to which she writes at, seen through here use of repetition. Ted also saw this in Ariel as he explains in “The God” saying “Then you wrote in a fury, weeping”, revealing the burning passion to which each poem holds.

Join now!

As Ted’s Birthday letters is written over a period thirty five years looking back on several events, therefore writing with a considered painful point of view. In his poems we can see that he wrote from a retrospective perspective which it all the more painful for him, having to relive bitter memories of the past. In “Blue Flannel Suit” Hughes can be seen to force upon memories. He can be seen to be overwhelmed at the fact that she is dead “I am still permanently now” which shows that he still cares for her even though she has left him. ...

This is a preview of the whole essay