• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What do acts III and IV tell us about justice, truth and the characters in this act?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What do acts III and IV tell us about justice, truth and the characters in this act? Arthur Miller wrote this play in accordance and reference to the persecution placed upon him and many others by the committee of un-American activities. He was persecuted for his way of thinking, and this inspired him to write the book " The Crucible" to make people realise that history is repeating. In his mind, the way he and the other communists were treated bared a great likeness to that of the "witches" of Salem and the way the Jews were treated during the holocaust. This, I think, is why the book and then the play had such a large effect on the country and the way the "un-American activities" committee treated the so called Comunists. In the sixteen hundreds Salem was ruled by a theocracy so their ideas of truth and justice would have varied from ours. The puritans ideology was that if the bible says its so, it's so. Most of us are now aware that most of the bible is not to be taken literally, but symbolically. ...read more.

Middle

As the maid to the Proctors, an official of the court and one of the accusing girls, Mary Warren had the power to stop all this foolishness. In act III Mary, with a little encouragement from Procter, does confess and tells the judges that it is all a false but she soon withdraws that claim when she herself is accused. There is a great change in Mary's character from acts I and II through III and IV. I think this is probably due to her supreme maturity to the other girls, she realises exactly how foolish she had been and what problems her lies were causing. Proctors behaviour affected the people of Salem in a great many ways. Primarily he was considered somewhat of a heretic due to the fact that he very rarely attended Holy Communion. He put this down to his dislike of Paris and his preaching of " bloody hellfire and damnation" I don't know how many believed this excuse. Secondly Proctor was not afraid to stand up to the court and tell them how ludicrous they were being about the witch-hunt and trials. ...read more.

Conclusion

She knows many sure ways of getting people to believe her. When she is trying to make out that Mary Warren is bewitching her, she knows exactly how to convince the judges. She is able to convince herself things are actually happening when they are not. This is why the look in her eyes, her screaming and her cowering etc. are so convincing, because she believes that the devil is there. In the final moments of the last scene the whole truth is revealed and the audience are manipulated to fell sorry for the Proctors and hate Abigail. And ultimately loose faith in goodness and perhaps even God. The scene is one of great emotion. Another very dramatic scene in the play is when Mary warren confronts the court to confess that the whole thing had been a lie. Not only does the sheer idea of the court finding out that they had convicted so many innocent people make it dramatic. In a desperate attempt to save themselves Abigail and the other girls claim that they can see Mary warren with the devil beside her. They start screaming and fainting and pretending to be cold, of course this is all a false but it makes the scene very dramatic. By Harry Smith ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Arthur Miller section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Arthur Miller essays

  1. There is no character in Acts 1-2 of 'The Crucible' who is Beyond Criticism. ...

    From this small sentence Miller shows us that Hale does in fact have a conscience and even possesses doubts as to whether those who confess to witchcraft are truly witches. Daring "not quail to follow wherever the accusing finger points", Hale realises the possibility that the finger may indeed be

  2. Write about the character of Danforth and his exercise of his judicial powers in ...

    It shows how seriously witchcraft was treated in the time in which the book was written. His power and influence over people would be shown on stage with him sitting in the highest chair in the court, probably looking down upon the others in the court.

  1. The Historical Background to the Crucible

    This was a factor that contributed towards the judgement of the girls' tales, because the townsfolk did not believe the girls would participate in such events. People also used accusations to hurt others. Again, John Proctor is the only person to recognize this, as he declares to Reverend Hale - 'Vengeance is walking Salem'.

  2. Miller's dramatic writing in The Crucible

    so that we understand the hypocritical side of their personnality: "staring as though inspired..... She is enraptured, as though in pearly light". The "though" clearly shows that they are merely acting. We also understand Betty's coma was acting because she calls out "hysterically and with great relief" which marks her

  1. Exploring the importance of religion to the community of Salem

    During act four Reverend Hale uses a well know quotation from the Bible when he compares his experience to that of Jesus when he says "I have gone this three months like our Lord into the wilderness", this in the Bible, according to Saint Matthew, was when Jesus was "led

  2. The Crucible Revision Notes

    The court cannot accept Mary Warren?s confession or John?s claims because to do would prove the court is a sham. 15. The only resolution possible is to publicly confess and in doing so blot his reputation ad publicly denounce his integrity 16.

  1. Explore Millers presentation of Proctor in The Crucible. How far do you agree with ...

    He is determined to bring her to court so she can explain the poppet incident. His motive for going into Salem and testifying in court is that he is outraged by the fact that Elizabeth might die for him. "My wife will never die for me!"

  2. 'Whilst we are appalled by Abigail Williams, we are fascinated by her as well'. ...

    Proctor describing this as ?little crazy children jangling the keys of the kingdom?, and Abigail?s intentions simply using ?common vengeance [writing] the law?, and rightly so, yet as the audience we can only be fascinated that what initiates as a simply baseless lie is in reality believable in Salem; only

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work