• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16
  17. 17
    17
  18. 18
    18
  19. 19
    19
  20. 20
    20
  21. 21
    21
  22. 22
    22

Waste, the Landfill Tax and the Inert Problem

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Waste, the Landfill Tax and the Inert Problem 1.0 ABSTRACT Waste is an important issue that affects us all; it is also very complex. What waste actually is is also very unclear the issue has been before the courts on a number of occasions because regulatory authorities and industry see the definitions differently. The confusion is caused by the existence of numerous definitions of waste. In England and Wales three main methods are used to deal with waste, they are Recycle and Reuse, Incineration and Landfill. All three methods have problems which can have a harmful effect on the environment or public health, reuse and recycling suffers from economic problems. In 1996 the government introduced the landfill tax which aimed to encourage recycling and reuse and to free up space at landfill sites. The landfill has reduced waste arisings at landfill sites but there is no evidence of increased re use or recycling, it is believed that the waste is being disposed of in either the unregulated or illegal sectors. This is then causing further environmental problems. 2.0 CONTENTS: Page No. 1.0 ABSTRACT 1 2.0 CONTENTS 2 3.0 APPENDICES 3 4.0 INTRODUCTION 4 5.0 WHAT IS WASTE 6 6.0 CURRENT DISPOSAL METHODS 9 7.0 THE LANDFILL TAX 12 8.0 THE INERT PROBLEM 15 9.0 REGULATION 19 10.0 CONCLUESION 20 11.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY AND REFERENCES 22 2.0 APPENDICES: Appendix 1 Statutory Definition of Waste Appendix 2 Statutory Definition of Special Waste Appendix 3 Section 45 of the EPA 1990 Appendix 4 ECOTEC (2000) Survey Framework Appendix 5 My survey Appendix 6 Graphs Appendix 7 Exemptions in Full Appendix 8 Photographs 4.0 INTRODUCTION Mellanby (1992) blames the waste problem entirely on humans, he says, "before Homo sapiens appeared on earth, there was no real waste materials." By this, he means that in nature nothing is wasted, the bodies of dead animals and plants are efficiently recycled when they die. ...read more.

Middle

Under the landfill tax, all waste that goes to landfill is subject to a tax levy of a certain amount per tonne. There were two tax rates introduced in 1996, eleven pounds per tonne of active waste and two pounds per tonne of inert waste. DETR (2000) states that in the 1999 budget the rate of tax charged on active waste is to be increased by one pound per year with a review in 2004. DETR (2000) goes on to state that the purpose of the increase is to encourage greater diversion of waste from landfill. Research carried out by ECOTEC (2000) on behalf of the DETR has shown that the landfill tax has had a significant effect on the amount of waste that is sent to landfill, the framework for the surveys carried out by ECOTEC is included in appendix 4. I have chosen not to use data from my own survey as the limited number of responses that I received mean that the data gathered can not be coincided reliable, details of my own survey are enclosed in appendix 5. Table 2 below shows changes to the arisings that occur at landfill sites before and after the introduction of the land fill tax. Pre tax Average tonnes Post tax Average tonnes % Change Company 1: site 1 186310.5 242244 30 Company 1: site 2 205945.5 230267.5 12 Company 1: site 3 1507000 695000 -54 Company 2: 3 sites 1930800 2162350 12 Company 3: site 1 247261.5 239957 -3 Company 3: 7 sites 6016500 5071000 -16 Company 3: site 9 796132 658272.5 -17 Company 4: site 1 483000 211200 -56 Company 5: site 1 490000 367500 -25 Company 6: 20 sites 4016000 3346500 -17 Totals 15878950 13224291 -17 Table 2 shows the change in mixed wastes sent to land fill before And after the introduction of the landfill tax, the data is based on Surveys carried out by ECOTEC (2000). ...read more.

Conclusion

predicted that this would happen because construction companies would fly tip rather than pay increased waste disposal costs at landfill. Reeds (1997) suggests that fly tipping is purely done to reduce costs and hence increase profits, he calls the construction industry greedy and uncaring for the environment. It has also been suggested by Broad (1997) that the landfill tax has discouraged the redevelopment of brown field sites because of the cost of disposing of contaminated soils. This goes against current government policy to redevelop brown field sites rather than encroaching on to green belt land. Issues of waste management are complex, it is going to be very difficult for the country to reduce the waste that we produce if we want the country to continue to grow economically, Mellanby (1992) says that growth in waste production is linked with economic growth. I believe that the only way to improve our waste management strategy is to increase the re use and recycling of waste. I would like to call on the government to introduce a tax levy on the use of virgin materials at a level that would make recycled products affordable and recycling operations economically viable. Other suggestions have been made for the long-term disposal of waste Angel (1996) suggests the use of the deep oceans for waste disposal. Angel (1996) does suggest that much research needs to be done before we start using that option because we need to ensure that we don't damage the fragile ecology of the oceans. I feel that during this study I have only scratched the surface of many important issues. I believe it to be of great importance that detailed research is carried out on the inert problem to discover the whole truth about what is going on and what we can do to prevent it from happening in the future. I believe that an interesting area for further study would be to look at the international trade of waste that was highlighted by the voyage of the Khian Sea ship that was carrying special waste between 1986 and 1988. 11. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Environmental Management section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Environmental Management essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    With reference to either Waste management in urban areas or Transport management in urban ...

    4 star(s)

    could contract potentially fatal respiratory diseases and cancer in the next 5-25 years due to exposure to the high levels of nitrogen dioxide and carbon monoxide. This problem was seen to not only impact on today's society but future generations of Cairo.

  2. I am going to research waste pollution. I have chosen to research waste pollution ...

    I am going to relate my research to the Greenwich borough, and I am going to do this by seeing how many landfill sites or incineration companies there are and are these affecting the people that live near by.

  1. Will big business save the earth? Business sector has always ...

    Not many of them seem to care that it will cost them a lot in the future to fix the problems they made nowadays. To them, in short-term saying, it will be much more difficult and expensive to take a more sustainable approach in doing business.

  2. Critically evaluate the view that understanding the multi-disciplinary nature Organisational Behaviour is essential to ...

    Clearly, this is not totally the case, as some manufacturing, for example, still requires that kind of work, however much of the need has decreased over the last century. However, change cannot be this tidy, linear or logical. Support for this structure can be found in the report published by

  1. The Environment: Whose Responsibility?

    In the UK we are turning this commitment into reality through our Cleaner Fuels programme. We are introducing four new BP fuels to our service stations which benefit the environment by reducing vehicle emissions, and thereby improving the quality of the air that we breathe...This website covers some of the

  2. A Local Ecosystem-Mt Keira

    Results: 1. Figure 6: Results of the Chemical and Physical Components of Sites 1 and 2: Component Measured Site 1:Hawkesbury Sandstone Open Forest Site 2: Narrabeen Shale Rainforest pH 4.38 6 Soil Texture Course, sandy Fine, Clay-like Soil Moisture 4.55 5.14 Aspect N/A 110o ESE This table shows the chemical and physical components at each of the two sites.

  1. It has been suggested that nuclear and/or wind power will fill the gap left ...

    France are able to produce 79% of their energy demand just from nuclear power meaning their emissions will be extremely low and have achieved energy security for years to come. Although nuclear power releases little emissions, plant construction and Uranium mining does release emissions but in comparison to oil or coal mining, very little is produced.

  2. Enviromental Health - how humans can damage the environment

    This is important, as wind erosion can do as little as damage your crop or as much as destroy the soil completely. Info taken from: http://www.odec.ca/projects/2004/derk4d0/public_html/Erosionaffectstheenvironment.htm 1. Monoculture Monocultures started off as a rather harmless way of increasing the yield by growing only one type of crop.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work