• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

M1 Analyse the impact of current safeguarding legislation on day to day work with children and young people

Extracts from this document...


M1 Analyse the impact of current safeguarding legislation on day to day work with children and young people Introduction Safeguarding is a concept that is not only concerned with child protection but also deals with many other issues. The safeguarding children initiative has seen a development and proliferation of professional organisations which supported by legislation, policies and procedures have powers and duties to keep children safe in several areas. These include being safe from accidents, free from bullying, not being forced into marriage, dealing with missing children, dealing with crime and offending behaviour, and above all actively promoting the welfare of children in a healthy and safe environment (Tassoni et al 2010, p 112). The main laws which influence the way the safeguarding system has evolved are the Children Act 1989 and the Children Act 2004. There are, however, many other laws and guidance which are instrumental to creating a safeguarding system to cope with the dynamic nature and challenges of today?s society. Amongst others, these include the Human Rights Act 1998, the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006, the Sexual Offences Act 1997 and government guidance in the form of Working Together To Safeguard Children 2013. This essay analyses the impact of some of these statutes and guidance on the day to day work of professionals with children and young people. Section The Children Act 1989 (CA 1989) is the main statute which governs the safeguarding of children and young people. Its arrival came after some significant historical events. First, there was the death of Jasmine Beckford in 1984 who died after being discharged from care and returned to her family (Ref). Shortly afterwards, and probably influenced by Jasmine?s death, was the extensive, and overwhelmingly incorrect amount of children taken into care following the infamous 1987 Cleveland child sexual abuse affair (Ref). ...read more.


Trying to keep the child with his or her natural parents may often lead to a succession of short term placements and the child who eventually requires a permanent placement is more likely to be emotionally damaged and consequently harder to place. They argue that prior to the 1989 Act the system at least allowed the possibility of a decisive happy ending. The no delay and no order principles are further challenged by the concurrent system of jurisdiction inherent in the CA 1989. This is where cases can be transferred vertically and horizontally between the family proceedings court, the county court and the High Court and whilst allowing cases to be dealt with by the most appropriate court it has in practice proved to be a significant cause of delay (Brammer 2010, p178). Speight and Wynne (2000, p194) also question the credibility of working in partnership with abusive parents, another central concept of the CA 1989, and indeed the later Children Act 2004 (CA 2004). Speight and Wynne point out that you do not enter into a partnership with criminals during an investigation and the idea that you can work in partnership with people who in fact have committed a criminal act has the effect of decriminalising child abuse. Such concerns of the CA 1989 were given more credibility when the death of Victoria Climbie in 2000 received national media coverage. The resulting moral panic resulted in a lot of intellectual activity and the passing in 2004 of a new Children Act which now works alongside the Children Act 1989. The 2004 Act was born from the public inquiry into Victoria Climbie?s death and the subsequent Green Paper ?Every Child Matters?. A central tenet of the CA 2004 is the concept of working together to safeguard children and that ?effective support for children and families cannot be achieved by a single-agency acting alone.? (Brammer 2010, p182). ...read more.


For instance, corporal punishment has been banned in English state schools since 1986 and children share an equal footing today with adults as regard to human rights. The CA 1989 came at a historical juncture where compromise was needed between protecting children and, after Cleveland, also protecting family rights, and has proved to be effective in offering professionals a range of options when dealing with the safeguarding of children. The CA 1989 has even been described by the Department of Health as offering a mix and match menu where a court can choose the best course of action, or actions, for the child (Brayne and Carr 2010, p 249) and the overriding theme is that the welfare of the child is the professional?s paramount consideration (Brammer 2010, p170). When looking back to society prior to the CA 1989 this statute has to a large degree been instrumental in creating a kind of cultural revolution and existing attitudes of not listening to the child and believing the adult have been steered to one that prides itself on child centred approaches where the welfare of the child comes above anything else. Even so, other high profile deaths indicated that collaboration between professionals and the workings of the multi-agency team were not totally effective and more legislation was needed. The CA 2004 has filled this need, with much more emphasis now on training professionals to work effectively in the multi-agency team. Overall, when analysing the impact of current safeguarding legislation on day to day work with children and young people a lot of evidence suggests that the legislation and guidance has provided many benefits. However, any professional or policy maker needs to be aware of all of the issues which come under the safeguarding umbrella. For example, the way that the reporting of a particular child?s death creates a moral panic and the call for government action, and the way the government responds to these high profile cases when in fact child homicides remain pretty constant over time with on average one child killed every week in the United Kingdom (Sudisafe, 2014). ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Healthcare section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Healthcare essays

  1. Equality, Divesity and rights

    What I should have done was apologise for my daughter's behaviour but I was too embarrassed and also I didn't want to draw any more attention to the situation. When we got home I did explain to my daughter (as best I could)

  2. Child Protection Law Essay

    the provision for him of such services; or he is disabled " (12) Within Section 17 emphasis is placed upon the general duty of every local authority to 'safeguard' and 'promote' the welfare of children within their area who are in need and promote the upbringing of such children by

  1. In this essay I will be outlining key legislation and regulations which govern safeguarding ...

    2008 National consultation exercise to review how it could be made better Report on exercise in July 2009 Safeguarding adults Set national standards, defined service models or why this might be Aimed to ensure a nation-wide approach to protection of adults and closer multi- agency working Dignity in care initiative

  2. Outline current legislation, guidelines policies and procedure within own UK Home Nation affecting the ...

    which places a duty of care on Early Years Practitioners and Managers to Safeguard children and young people and promote their welfare. This is evident in raising a CAF on a child due to observations in setting then working as part of a multi agency team that acknowledges if

  1. Unit 10 - p2, m1, d1. I will be outlining types of quality care ...

    This will protect children from maltreatment, preventing impairment of their health or development and it also ensure children are growing in circumstances in which will promote the child?s safety. Safeguarding gives parent essential information on how their child should be looked after within their own care and the care of professional or other individuals.

  2. Unit 10 Caring for Children and Young People P2, M1 & D1

    Maslow?s hierarchy of needs starts with basic physical needs and branches out to wider needs such as emotional and psychological needs, and these pieces of legislation, policies and procedures all aim to meet at many needs of a child or young person as possible in order for them to reach their full potential.

  1. Explain the strategies and methods that can be used to support children, young people ...

    They also need to realise the difference between bad secrets and good secrets. Good secrets are usually only to be kept from one or two people, for example, presents for someone?s birthday. Bad secrets are usually those which are to be kept from everyone else except the people who are directly involved, for example, inappropriate pictures, words or touching.

  2. Safeguarding Children and Young People: This essay looks at how to spot child abuse, ...

    Another physical indicator which is a common indicator of sexual abuse is genital and urinary infections. Genital and urinary infects are not always caused by sexual abuse but are also caused by the individual having a weak immune system because they have been neglected.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work