This war against terrorism has not worked at all. Instead, it is causing not only political, but also economical and social effects as well. Some of the political effects include many other countries and governments which have different opinions and points of view on the sides of the terrorist attacks. For example, many people in the United Nations can’t say that Israel’s Prime Minister is a terrorist, but still many others say Yaser Arafat is. In this case, the United Nations can’t “pick a side.” This may cause political problems within the nation and internationally because many countries fight over who is right. Also, within the nation, the population suffers any attacks that the country has been facing due to terrorism. It is also said that in Afghanistan “where also terrorists are known to be sheltering, the story is different. Cruise missiles and smart bombs seek out secret nooks and crannies where intelligence reports say terrorists and their supporters lurk. Bank accounts around the world are frozen. Most wanted lists are published with bounties worth millions of dollars” (Selective War).
During a speech, a month after the terrorist disaster of the World Trade Center, President Bush addresses to the war against terrorism:
“The attack took place on American soil, but it was an attack on the heart and soul of the civilized world. And the world has come together of fight a new and different war, the first, and we hope the only one, of the 21st century. A war against all those who seek to export terror and a war against those governments that support or shelter them.
We’re mounting a sustained campaign to drive the terrorists out of their hidden caves and to bring them to justice (. . .)” (Bush)
Of particular interest to American Muslims was the President’s promise that the Peace Corps will "join a new effort to encourage development and education and opportunity in the Islamic world” (Abdelkarim). President Bush went on to proclaim: "America will lead by defending liberty and justice, because they are right and true and unchanging for all people everywhere. No nation owns these aspirations, and no nation is exempt from them. We have no intention of imposing our culture, but America will always stand firm for the nonnegotiable demands of human dignity” (Abdelkarim). Taken at face value, this proposal will be viewed by many in the U.S. as an extended hand of friendship from the United States to the Muslim world. But how will Muslims react? Will they accept this offer as a genuine attempt to enhance mutual understanding? Will they be moved by Bush’s promise that "America will take the side of brave men and women who advocate these values around the world, including the Islamic world?" (Abdelkarim).
What Bush may not have realized is that the world’s Muslims, including many American Muslims, hardly paid any attention to his comments on the war against terrorism, promoting education, and development in the Muslim world. Instead, most noted that his war was two-thirds Muslim population, with North Korea “thrown in for window dressing” (Abdelkarim). They also noted that the only organizations he categorized as terrorist were Muslim, including the Hamas, Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad, and Jayshi Muhammadi (Abdelkarim).
A few isolated areas have been accepted, the Taliban have surrendered control of Afghanistan and a new government is in place. On December 16, U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell pronounced Al-Qaeda defeated in Afghanistan as U.S. planes and Afghan Tribal fighters chased down the fleeing the workforce (World Press Review). This is what is said. Still, if there is a new government and bin Laden is still alive, isn’t there any chance of more terrorism led by him in the world? Apparently, the U.S. government has been working against terrorism for many years; still no positive result about winning the war has been said.
As the U.S. military continues its search for Taliban leader Mullah Mohammed Omar and Osama bin Laden, most of the world's press now covers the last stages of the U.S. action in Afghanistan with superficial cable reports (World Press Review). Attention about terrorism has now shifted to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and Iraq, since there has not been much done to terminate terrorism.
Throughout the years, all over the world, terrorism has always occurred. President Bush pushed a campaign to try to finish with terrorist attacks. It is a so called “war on terrorism,” due to the September 11th attacks, which triggered it, where more than 6,000 people died. The responsibility blamed on Osama Bin Laden, the leader of the Al-Qaeda group. He is the FBI’s most wanted man. So far Bush's war against terrorism looks like a war against just one target, and many Afghans have stayed awake, terrified for the past 8 months and many more nights. This war on terrorism isn’t working at all. There are many causes for this. For example, the different points of views are an obstacle to the solution of this problem. Since Ancient Greece and Rome until now, humanity has been living with terrorism, and nothing good has been done to stop it completely.
Bibliography
Abdelkarim, Riad Z, MD. “PR alone won’t win Arab, Muslim hearts & minds.” N.date. N.pag. Online. Internet. Available at:
May 14, 2002
Anderson, Sean and Sloan, Stephenson. Historical Dictionary of Terrorism. dfdsf<1995. n.pag. Online. Internet. Available at: dgagfgf dgagfgf dgagfgf
“Attack on Terrorism - Campaign on terror.” The Financial Times. 2002. N. pag. Online. Internet. Available at: May 14, 2002
Bush, George. “An Attack on the Civilized World.” October 11, 2001. n.page. dgagfgfOnline. Internet. Available at: dgagfgf dgagfgf dgagfgf dgagfgf dgagfgf May 1, 2002
Halliday, Fred. “Terrorism.” May, 2001. 1 page. Online. Internet. Available at:
http://www.globalpolicy.org/wtc/terrorism/2510t.htm f May1, 2002
Harlow, Bill. “The War on Terrorism.” Oct. 9, 2001. N.pag. Online. Internet. Available at: , 2002
Harris, Tom. “Creating Terror.” 1998-2002:n.pag. On-Line. Internet. Available at: May1, 2002
Hoffman, Bruce. “Terrorism and Counterterrorism After September 11thAttacks.” N.date. N.pag. Online. Internet. Available at: dfdfdsfhttp://usinfo.state.gov/journals/itps/1101/ijpe/pj63hoffman.htm May 1, 2002
MAK. “Al-Qa’ida (The Base).” N.date. N.pag. Online. Internet. Available at:
May 7, 2002
Public Agenda. Terrorism. April 26, 2002. n.page. Online. Internet. Available dgagfg at: , 2002
“Selective War.” Arab News Editorial. Oct. 25, 2001. N.pag. Online. Internet. Available at: May 14, 2002
Sidesshow, MC. “The Soul Assassins.” N.date. N.pag. Online. Internet. Available at May 7, 2002
“Terrorism.” Encarta Online Encyclopedia. 2002. 3 pages. On-line. Internet. Available at: May1, 2002
“Tyrannicides at the Virtual Dictionary.” Lexico. 2002. N.pag. Online. Internet. Available at: May 7, 2002
White House. “Frequently Asked Questions.” N.date. N.pag. On-line. Internet. Available at: , 2002
World Press Review. “The War against Terror.” Dec. 19, 2001. N.pag. Online. Internet. Available at: May 4, 2002
A BATTLE WITHOUT BORDERS
STEPHANIE CHAKI
ENGLISH PERIOD #: 1
WORLD HISTORY PERIOD #: 3
Literature Review
The site called “PR alone won’t win Arab, Muslim hearts & minds” is an article from the Arab News. It will help the research is a way that it give the opinion and a “report” saying hat the people are suffering. Also it says what President Bush is offereing many Afghans and counterpointing him also. This is a biased site for the Muslims because it totally supports Arab and American Muslims. It will the paper give it an essence and prove that Bush has done nothing that what he has said. This way, it will give the paper, a way to say there have been many promises to the Muslims by Bush and nothing has happened. It is a trust worthy site because it comes from the English Daily Newspaper in Saudi Arabia, so there they have a reputation at stake if they print anything that has no real, genuine information.
The site called “Historical Dictionary of Terrorism,” is going to help the investigation a lot because it gives all the armies of terrorism and a little information about each of the armies from each country. This site is trustworthy because it gives information about the different terrorist groups giving a lot of information. It also has a copyright. This source is gotten from the internet but it is also a book, and was published by The Scarecrow Press, Inc. It will help the paper in a way that it gives information about the armies that can be included in the paper because its subject is terrorism. Also, it gives information about Osama Bin Laden’s Al-Qaeda group.
The article called “Attack on Terrorism-Campaign on Terror,” is a good cite because it helps the researcher find different article about many issues going on with the war against terrorism. It will help the researcher just read about what is going on and then conclude what points will help to the proving of the initial thesis. It is a trustworthy site because it is a newspaper that has its reputation at stake and any bad information about an occurring event will damage it.
The source cited “An Attack on the Civilized World” is a speech written by George W. Bush present day president of the United States. It will help the research be deeper and by this support my thesis against terrorism with Bush’s statements by saying that his statements are not always true and his war against terrorism isn’t working. Also it has many sites that take the researcher to other sources which will also help the research. It is trustworthy because it comes from the “Network of Terrorism” which is a site created for terrorism and says things that come from the U.S. government. It will help the paper to give small arguments and say what Bush’s opinion is.
The source titled “Terrorism,” is a very good source because it talks about what the word means. It talks about what the history and some background information about terrorism. This resource will help the research in a very good way by making the researcher think clearer about the topic and know a little more about it. It argues about the three phases in history of terrorism and about what political effects it has on the world. This source is trustworthy by the way it talks of the information. It shows events throughout history that the researcher knows about and can familiarize with. The source seems very trustworthy because though the author is not biased, he talks reliably about facts the researcher knows about. This source will help the paper because using information from here will help give a background to what terrorism is and some information to help give the paper better arguments to support the proposal. It supports it by saying that terrorism has always been in the world and nothing has been done about it.
The site titled the “War on Terrorism,” is a very good site to help the researcher in a way that it guides the researcher toward knowing what the CIA is doing and what it has done. It will also be good for the researcher to see that sometimes the U.S. also admits that they are wrong or have mistaken. It is a very trustworthy cite because it was from CNN. They are a trustworthy site and say everything true because of their reputation at stake. It will help the researcher in the paper because it confirms that the CIA has been working on the war against terrorism for a very long time. This will prove the thesis by saying it hasn’t had any positive effects and that it hasn’t worked at all.
This source which is called “Creating Terror,” is a very good source for the research. It gives an idea to the researcher on what terrorism is. It gives information on the terrorist armies in the world such as in Ireland and Arab countries. It gives criteria from the U.S. department. Also it gives statistics. This source is trustworthy because it gives a very good quality of information. This information has been published in a site that is called “How stuff works,” and appears to be a very good one. If it weren’t reliable, the site above wouldn’t have published the information written by Harris. It is a good site to trust because apart from giving where the author got its sources. Also the place where the article got published, “How Stuff Works,” has a reputation to gain. This site is going to help the paper to give some arguments that will help support the proposal of the problem and thesis, by saying everything on terrorism and the war on its own. Also by talking about who is Osama Bin Laden.
The source called “Terrorism and Counterterrorism After September 11th Attacks,” helps the research because September 11th argues for a re-configuration of both the thinking of people about terrorism and how they should prepare and organize to counter it. It talks about the significance of the September 11th attacks and some of the characteristics of it such as how many terrorists, by whom, the professionalism, synchronization of the attack, etc. It also helps the researcher see a different opinion, which is bias. This source is trustworthy because it gives information that was published as an article for the federal government. There maybe some facts in it that don’ give as much information and importance to the research, but the rest is fine. It is also very trustworthy because it shows where the author of the source got its information from. This source is going to help the paper of the researcher because it gives very clear information. It will help the paper give a little more essence to what terrorism is and about the September 11th attacks. Also, it is going to help support the thesis of the paper by telling many opinions and everything about the September 11th attacks.
The source called “Al-Qaeda (The Base)” is going to help the researcher know about Osama Bin Laden’s life, in other words his biography. Also, it will help the research by saying what the Al-Qaeda is and making the researcher understand better what their purpose is. It is a trustworthy site because it is from the International Islamic Front for Jihad Against the Jews and Crusaders, although this site is a biased site for Muslims. It will help the paper show why the group wants to do this and it gives the importance of it.
The source called “Terrorism” is a good source because it is a site full of links, terms, background, etc. It is going to help the researcher find information about terrorism because it talks perfectly on terrorism. Also it has an overview and public opinion. It is based on September 11th attacks and also includes charts. This is a trustworthy site because it shows reliable information and links and shows from where the information was gotten. It is going to help the paper because it has statistics and public opinion which will help argument the thesis. It is going to give a lot of information that can be used on the paper.
The article called “Selective War” is a very good site also from the Arab News. It will help the research by saying the Muslims, for example, are the only ones who are getting the most out of the war against terrorism. They have to hear bombing and be killed night after night. It helps know the difference that many countries with terrorist groups are living wit. Also, it is a very trustworthy site because it is from the Arab News, and they have a reputation at stake and can’t afford to loose it. This article is also biased because it complains that the Muslims are the only ones suffering, and it isn’t true. They are whining.
The website called “The Soul Assassins” is a good website to find out what the Hashashin are and how you can relate them. It helps the research because it helps with terms not known and say that they were there in a phase in history. Also, the reader of the paper must understand what unknown terms are. It is a reliable site because it had the sources listed from which it got it’s information.
The source cited “Terrorism” from Encarta, is a very good site. It gives the real meaning or definition of what terrorism is and means and also gives background information. It gives general information but very good one. This source is very trustworthy since it tells very true information and comes from Encarta, which is a very good place to find true information. It will help the paper by giving the writer a sense of feeling to write about the true things. This site is also going to help the paper because articles related to it have information on different countries and more on terrorism.
The article called “Tyrannicides at the Virtual Dictionary” is going to help the researcher understand many words that are unknown to her. It will give the researcher a sense of direction towards the use of the words. It will help the paper to give a reader also a sense of direction toward the words he or she might be reading. It is trustworthy because Dictionary.com is a very important site with its reputation at stake. Also, it listed the sources where it got its information from.
The source called “Frequently Asked Questions” appears to be a very good source since it is a site that has many excellent answers to questions on terrorism. It will help the research in a very good way because it brings a big list of links that also talk about terrorism. It will help the research because some of the questions include questions that have never been answered to the researcher or have been found confusing. It is a trustworthy site because the site comes from the “White House,” which is bias. It will help the paper in a way because it has links that talk in general about terrorism and some in depth on the topic. It will help the paper be much more in depth in knowledge. Also, it will give many arguments that George Bush has and what he plans to do with the war against terrorism.
The article called “The War against Terror” from the World Press Review is a very good site because it also talks about the thesis of this research paper. It gives many examples which can be used. It looks like a trustworthy site because the Wrold Press Review is a sort of Virtual Newspaper that gives news about many topics around the world, in this case, about the war against terrorism.