• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the significance of the depression to the NSDAP rise to power in the period from 1929-1933

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Modern History Essay Asses the significance of the depression of the NSDAP rise to power in the period from 1929-1933 The rise of the NSDAP and Hitler, within the Weimar, was the conclusive event which sparked the end of Germany?s first ?true democracy?. The collapse of the US Stock exchange in October 1929, led to an anti-democratic wave throughout Germany, and much of the population, seeked alternative leaders and a new style of government. The depression was significant event, of which assisted the rise to power of the NSDAP, as the use of powerful propaganda, such as the ?Hitler over Germany? campaign, highlighted the weaknesses of the democracy economically and politically and gained heavy support for the extremist groups. Although the depression,, had a significant consequence of the overall fate of Germany it cannot be solely based, as the NSDAP?s significant short term rise can also be derived from the grounds of internal political failures and instability as well as unfavorable economic policies and decisions. Firstly, the collapse of the US Stock Exchange caused severe economic depression within Germany, of which the extremist right wing group the NSDAP used for powerful propaganda in promotion to the working class of Germany. ...read more.

Middle

The depression of 1929, had clearly made democracy seem vulnerable to an economic collapse , and the scrambling efforts made by Bruinig, such as the development of the deflationary policy only made the crash seem more substantial, and at the price of losing various support to the extremist groups such as the NSDAP. Although the depression did ultimately lead to the substantial short tem rise of the NSDAP it cannot be the sole motive. The division of the left, political instability and a naïve view of Nazi Power and its capability all are liable for the short term rise to power of the NSDAP. The political instability which had arose from the fall of the Muller Government in 1930 contributed largely to the rising dominance of the NSDAP, and the eventual rise of Hitler in the position of chancellor. The political division amongst the left was certainly a major factor in the fanatical rise of Hitler and the Nazi Party. A long feud had been running between the German Communist Party and the Social Democratic Party, of which had begun when the SPD had eliminated the Spartcists movement in 1919. The conflict between the two allowed the Nazi Party to establish itself amongst major politics, if the two parties need not participate in conflict and unification could have used against the growing fear of the NSDAP. ...read more.

Conclusion

The role of Von Papen in the rise of the NSDAP during the time period of 1929-1933 played a decisive role in the overall outcome. His ?final deal? in January, proposed that Hitler come to power and his position to become Vice Chancellor. His persuasition of Hindenburg to instate Hitler as Chancellor played the final role in the overall conclusion of democracy. Von Papen?s belief that he could control Hitler while in power, highlights the overall failure in which Papen showed. Papen?s underestimate of the Nazis is shown through his description of the proposal that of ?no danger at all?. The rise of the NSDAP during the time period therefore must also become liable to Von Papen has his false predications of Hitler and his movement allowed, the NSDAP to gain control of Germany legally, as well as the official support by German people and its Army. In conclusion, the depression was significant through that it cause major economic and social depression amongst Germany. The ways in which it had been addressed also led to powerful propaganda by the NSDAP assisting their rise to power. Alternatively external elements such as the divisions on the left as well as the political failures by the leaders of Germany lead to the overall rise of the NSDAP during the time period of 1929 to 1933. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. This essay will examine the rise of anti-Semitism from ancient times to the Holocaust ...

    This must have helped his political career take off. By 1919 Hitler had already formed some opinions which became the basis of National Socialism. These were a fanatical sense of German nationalism, a racially inspired view of society, encompassing extreme anti-Semitism and a belief in the German Volk as the

  2. How and why did the Weimar Governments collapse between October 1929 and January 1933?

    to the qualities of a Kaiser, as the rule under the Kaiser was a stable time for Germany, unlike under this new and mysterious 'democracy'. And in 1933, Hitler would fit that role exactly. Democracy posed another problem for Weimar, due to the components of the constitution.

  1. Mussolini(TM)s rise to power up to 1922 owes more to the failures of others ...

    This vagueness was an effective tactic to gain maximum support as shown that the Fascist party went from having no parliamentary seats in 1919, to having 35 in 1921. The early fascists retained their radical idealism which many found attractive, the Squadristi emphasized virility and violence and the move to the right attracted conservative support.

  2. History - Mussolini's Rise to Power

    The government's passive attitude towards both the war and extremism contributed to mass discontent and, reciprocally, an opportunist attitude among the Fascists, sparking from the growing realisation of their inability to handle these situations. The third most substantial group with the potential to oppose the Fascists consisted of the millions of Italian Catholics across the country, especially in the south.

  1. Hitlers Germany

    When the Reichstag failed to pass it, Bruening had Hindenburg invoke Article 48 and implement his program by presidential decrees. The Reichstag, acting within its constitutional rights, overrode the chancellor and revoked these decrees. Normally, upon this vote of no confidence, Bruening and his government should have resigned.

  2. Why did Hindenburg appoint Hitler as Chancellor in 1933?

    Hitler was able to encapsulate an audience with his amazing speeches; he was a very good orator. Hitler was appointed head of the Nazi party in 1921 after he had made his twenty-five point programme which he used to try and over throw the government, in 1923 - because of

  1. Can Napoleon's rise to power merely be attributed to his control of the government?'

    leader if they seized the opportunity and that is exactly what Napoleon did. This is one of the first clear factors which show that Napoleon's rise to power cannot merely be attributed to his control of the army. It was during the Revolution that Napoleon transformed himself into a Jacobin

  2. What in your view was the short term significance of the Decembrist Revolt?

    is certainly worth mentioning that her account is arguably biased as she had her own self interests with regard to the British Empire, who were uneasy of Russia. She was also not a sympathiser with Slavophil ideals and expected Russia to expand in the way Britain had done.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work