• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the view that Booker T. Washington was the most important leader in the development of African American civil rights in the period of 1865 to 1992.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Assess the view that Booker T. Washington was the most important leader in the development of African American civil rights in the period of 1865 to 1992. Booker T. Washington was arguably the first of at least five important leaders in the development of black civil rights. The work of W.E.B Du Bois continued throughout the period from 1909 to the 1950s, while Malcolm X and Garvey experienced short-lived but powerful leadership. Overall, Martin Luther King was the most important leader ? showing empathy towards all African American attitudes. Booker T. Washington advocated the ?Accomodationist? strategy ? he believed blacks should not demand anything, and should work towards civil rights through education. He formed the Tuskegee Institute and made his opinion known in his Atlanta Compromise Speech in 1895; both received positive responses, and did encourage black people to pursue higher aspirations through education. Therefore, Washington was an important leader in ?laying the foundation? for African Americans to use their rights effectively and pragmatically. However, his actions were extremely limited as the President ? Andrew Johnson was racist, followed by other racist presidents, and the Supreme Court was not influenced by Washington. ...read more.

Middle

He was important because this attitude set in motion the ?Black Power? attitude that would emerge in the 1960s, while in comparison, Washington encouraged a ?modest? and ?victimised? black attitude ? which was, overall, received negatively by black people. However, Garvey?s career coincided with economic prosperity, the Jazz Age and the Harlem Renaissance; these positive factors would have happened regardless of Garvey ? giving him less importance as a leader of African Americans towards civil rights. The fact that Washington had the Jim Crow laws and extremely racist Supreme Court officials to contend with, compared with Garvey?s ?lucky? timing of the economy and weakened Supreme Court ? by Du Bois ? this can show that Washington was more important than Garvey. Washington may not have achieved much, compared to other leaders, but he was at the very start of the period ? challenging America when racism was still deeply engrained. Whereas Garvey also did not achieve much, but he came at a time when attitudes had already begun to change ? Garvey was not as important as Washington. Malcolm X continued Garvey?s view of white racism never changing, but his attitude was more radical than Garvey?s and perhaps not as important as Washington, as Malcolm X had advantages during his career; while Washington?s only advantage was his education. ...read more.

Conclusion

encouraged education and less resentment towards the white man ? in that sense, the social sense, Washington was not the most important leader, Martin Luther King was. Even in the political sense, King was the most important leader and Washington was clearly not as important as even Du Bois and the NAACP. For example, King was so successful with Governmental support, that by 1961 810 Southern towns had desegregated facilities. Whereas Washington merely lunched with Teddy Roosevelt and attended events with White political figures while the Supreme Court remained racist. To conclude, although Martin Luther King had a number of benefits: the most supportive president, the wonders of the media, growing white sympathy and a golden opportunity with the 100th Anniversary of the Emancipation Proclamation ? King was clearly the most important leader. Garvey and Malcolm X had too strong a view, and did not take action to help African Americans for a sustained period of time, Du Bois was perhaps the second most important ? as the NAACP showed a gradual success in the courts; encompassing social and political change. Booker T. Washington was important as he set civil rights activism in motion, but he did not take on a role as important as Martin Luther King. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    To what extent were Malcolm X and the subsequent Black Power Movement the 'Evil ...

    4 star(s)

    It is fair to say that Black Power did stir up a negative reaction towards black activists but without Black Power, it is unlikely that African Americans would have achieved much more at the pace nonviolent protest was taking them; something that slowed down even further after the assassination of King48.

  2. Peer reviewed

    Assess the view that the Supreme Court was the most important branch of federal ...

    4 star(s)

    formalised segregation in many southern states, making it clear that public areas should not be segregated, and that equal rights for all still applied in those areas. This act was, however, declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, beginning with their ruling in the case of US v.

  1. Compare the aims, methods and achievements of MLK and Malcolm X. Which man do ...

    than an activist, and that his easily attacked espousals of violence and his belief in the Doctrine of Yakub (which suggested that an ancient black scientist named Yakub created white men, and slavery was Allah's punishment for this) made him likely to fail in affecting mainstream white society.

  2. Comparison of Presidents Harry Truman, Dwight Eisenhower and Lyndon Johnson

    In addition, while his bills were meant to make greater consequences for the crime of discrimination, many of the ideas were not followed by the states and segregation continued. Eisenhower's biggest accomplishment was setting the stage for more bills to come, not for greatly enhancing equality in the U.S.

  1. Short term impact of Malcolm X

    On the other hand, "Malcolm, dead, often seemed more influential than King, alive"39After his death "his autobiography was published and published speeches were widely read; even millions of white radicals grew to respect and honour Malcolm's legacy."40Marable cited by Wilkins said about Malcolm "Master spell-binder that he was, Malcolm X

  2. Linguistic Study - Linguistic Analysis of Martin Luther King's 'I Have a Dream', and ...

    He refers to the Constitution and Declaration of Independence, quoting from the Constitution itself: 'This note was a promise that all men, yes, black men as well as white men, would be guaranteed the "unalienable rights" of "Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness'.

  1. How important was the strength of opposition to impact the New Deal in the ...

    Roosevelt would have been aware of this, it is thought of the Left "advocating simple solutions"24 however their "solutions did not bring the results"25, it was possible for Long to Capitalize support from Coughlin and Townsend, crushing Roosevelt and the New Deal the picture source26 strengthens Badgers assertion that the

  2. Assess the view that the Supreme Court was the most important branch of the ...

    The other branches of the federal government, president and Congress, were not as important as the Supreme Court in helping blacks attain social rights. Congress and the president are more ?connected? to each other than they are with the Supreme Court.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work