• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20
  21. 21
  22. 22
  23. 23
  24. 24
  25. 25
  26. 26

Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

Extracts from this document...


Causes of show trials+purges of 1930s There have been many devastating events which have made great marks in history. Events of notable mention are the Nazi Holocaust of WW2, the use of the atomic bomb at Hiroshima, and the great terror of the 1930's in the Soviet Union. This great terror was sparked by a number of events, none more notable than the assassination of Sergei Kirov on the 1st of December 1934. There are many other reasons that the Soviet government use to justify these events, such as to defy attacks by counter-revolutionists, to clean up the Communist Party and to exterminate old ideals that are no longer supported by the Party. Historians argue these ideas to this very day, with many of them disagreeing on the topic of what actually provoked the purges. Some even argue the fact that Stalin should not have been in power, but instead he simply manipulated the government to his own ideals. However there is one thing that can not be disputed by any historian, and that is that fact that these purges and show trials were all major historical events, with much interest from across the world. The show trials and purges had a mixed reaction around the Western world, but by reading newspapers from the time of the incidents it can be seen that all countries come to a basic consensus. This consensus is that the actions that the Soviet Union took against the accused were inhuman and unnecessary. The purpose of this essay is to evaluate the causes of the show trials and purges of the 1930's and to evaluate the Western worlds reaction to these events. It does so by examining the processes of the show trials, and by investigating popular publications that deal with current events, from the time of the Sergei Kirov assassination. Based on this examination, it is possible to conclude that Stalin used the purge to rid the Soviet Union of all of his opposition, personal and political ...read more.


This is perhaps illustrated by the fact that during the July days there was real pressure for change on the part of the urban masses and the Soviets, far from gripping the chance to take power actually put pressure on the people to stop demonstrating. This, therefore could almost be seen as a single powerbase in Russia. Ferro sums this up well as quoted above, the attitude of the people, going out on to the streets shows a dissatisfaction with the Soviets which derives, it could be argued from their position regarding the Provisional government. `The term dual power suggests two separate bodies working together, for a common aim, this therefore cannot be an accurate description of dual power in Russia. Even though during the July days there was no push by the Soviets to get power they believed that the February revolution was the start of the bourgeois revolution in Russia and, according to Marxist doctrine the Socialist revolution would follow later. Therefore by supporting the Provisional government for ideological reasons the socialists would seem to be supporting dual power but in reality they would only be supporting it until its downfall in the Marxist view of historical progression. The fact that neither group pushed total power in the first place is perhaps the most important reason to consider when looking at dual power. Hasegawa feels that the Provisional government over-estimated the control that the Executive Committee of the Soviets held over the mass of the people. This, combined with the idea that the Soviet should not take total power due to Marxist doctrine shows that neither felt that they could take total power on their own and entered into this system of dual power. It is therefore no surprise that socialist entered the coalition government from the Soviets. The July days and the Kornilov revolt were signals, it can be argued, of popular and elite opposition to the political system. ...read more.


They swayed between the political ideas and parties that appealed to them. The Provisional Government was always in disagreement due to different wants and the problem of who was in control of the army and factories was another problem to face. Social divisions were becoming visible and Petrograd Soviets who held the majority of the power were beginning to turn towards the Bolsheviks. Trotsky joined the Bolsheviks in July also. Lenin and Trotsky together began taking advantage of the situation and the vulnerability of their opponents and the resentment of the citizens due to the war. They promised an end to the war, and Lenin adopted the quote 'Peace, Land, Bread', which appealed to the masses. All eyes were on the Bolsheviks. Action was expected and Kerensky used troops to close the Bolsheviks' printing press, enabling Trotsky to claim counter-revolution. Late at night on October 25 the Bolsheviks took the Winter Palace. Kerensky had no support and it was announced that power had been passed to the Soviet and a new government was set up with Lenin as the Chairman- 'The Council of Peoples Commissars'. Overall, all of these factors led to the Bolshevik Revolution in October 1917. However, not all factors were as influential as others were. The particularly significant events were the February Revolution as this produced a weaker power making it easier to overthrow. Also, the wars in 1904/5 with Japan and 1914 involving the great powers were important as they shook the regime and disrupted the economy. Bloody Sunday and the 1905 Revolt were influential as they displayed mass dissatisfaction, enabling the Bolsheviks to gain power. Furthermore, Marxism played a leading role in the revolution as it formed the basis of the Bolshevik Party and its ideologies. Yet, arguably, the revolution would not have occurred without Lenin who was the mind behind the Bolshevik strategies and timing. Perhaps Trotsky was also responsible as he had the oratorical skills to persuade the citizens to support him. Factors with smaller roles in the revolution are the population and structure, the July days and the Kornilov Affair. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Explain how the effects of the First World War caused the collapse of the ...

    4 star(s)

    The food, fuel and other shortages continued because of the war. A huge offensive in July 1917 failed and Russia suffered death and defeat again. The Bolsheviks, on the other hand, were the only group who stood up against the war.

  2. Russia 1905-1941 'Explain how the unpopularity of the Provisional Government contributed to the Bolshevik ...

    The army itself was the second reason why the Provisional Government decided to continue with the War. Russia had 9 million soldiers and could not be disbanded otherwise they would become a threat to government stability. The Russian public wanted to end the war but the Provisional Government wanted to

  1. 'In the context of the period 1715-1815 to what extent were economic factors the ...

    Many historians have also argued that the nature of government and society under the ancien r�gime invited the Revolution. William Doyle believes that French government was so archaic and strained that it simply could not stand up any longer. He argues that 'every aspect of the ancien r�gime...had no uniformity'23.

  2. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    This explains Stalin's success in getting the support of Party Conferences. 2. The Secretariat prepared the agenda of the meeting and supplied documentation. It also transmitted the decisions to the lower parts of the Party. Potentially this gave Stalin considerable power as agendas and documentation could be used to

  1. Assess the economic, social and political consequences of the collectivisation of Russian agriculture in ...

    The main reasons for the introduction of collectivisation by Stalin was that he wanted to produce more food so that he could feed the workers in industry, whilst also creating a surplus of food to sell overseas thus stimulating the economy.

  2. How far do you agree that the assassination of Alexander II in 1881 was ...

    Most significantly it marked the start of the so called crisis of rising expectations, whereby the Russian people's hopes for improvement to life were repeatedly built up and then shattered by inadequate and/or poorly executed reform.

  1. Why did revolution in Russia succeed in February 1917 and not in 1905? (30 ...

    This inextricable link between the Tsar and the war, strengthened by his incompetence as a military strategist, is a key factor as to why his previously loyal army defected, which, as discussed, led to the success of the February Revolution.

  2. The Holocaust was the result of Hitlers long held grand design to pursue a ...

    [Goering and Goebbels proceed to debate how Jews are to be excluded from German life] Heydrich: In spite of the elimination of the Jew from the economic life, the main problem, namely to kick the Jews out of Germany, remains?Following a suggestion by the commissioner of the Reich, we have

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work