• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16

Compare and Contrast the February and October Revolutions in Russia.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Russian Revolution Compare and Contrast February and October Revolutions Writing II, Modern World History The entire Russian Revolution was marked by the two revolutions within the major one. In chronological order the February Revolution was the first one, and the second one was the October Revolution. Clearly to see from their names, the February Revolution happened in February and the October Revolution happened in October. Between these two months it was a period of transition. During that time, Russia was ruled by a provisional government led by Prince Gregory Lvov. Honestly said, they were both very significant to Russian history. The two revolutions were very different from each other in that they were different types of revolutions and one had violence while another didn?t, but they were the same in that the people supported both of them for the same reasons. The first difference is that the February Revolution was more of a spontaneous riot of the people rather than a revolution, while the October Revolution was an actual overthrow of the government led by Vladimir Lenin. The February Revolution happened before the October Revolution. Due to this, the people involved in it didn?t have a clue about what to expect from the results from the Revolution. First of all, the February Revolution was completely uncalled for. It was a riot lead by the peasants of St. Petersburg. They were all unhappy with the living conditions which they experienced during the times of war. ...read more.

Middle

Also they were scared to enter the war after so many of their friends and relatives had already perished in the battle fields. Due to this the St. Petersburg garrison sympathized with the public havoc on the streets and joined in with the rioting crowd, rather than destroying the riot with clubs and guns. Much different than in the February Revolution, in the October Revolution military forces played a highly significant role. In fact, Lenin had even formed his own private army, which he called the Red Guard. Later on the Red Guard was made larger so that it became called the Red Army. Its purpose was to eliminate enemies of the Bolshevik regime, and also to fulfill tasks as the assassination of the Romanov family. The Red Army was a type of watchdog for Lenin, since anyone who opposed the Bolshevik ideas was immediately put in place by the Red Army. Undoubtedly, the October Revolution lived from the military strength of the Red Guard much more, than the February Revolution did. The idea of Marxism-Leninism was the proclaimed ideology of Russia after the Bolshevik takeover took place. As the name makes clear, its founders were the German philosopher Karl Marx and Vladimir Lenin. Actually the idea was of Marx?s origin, and he also wrote it down in his book, the Communist Manifesto. However, Lenin deserves to have his name mentioned in the political idea, since he was the one who enforced the belief so much in Russia, and also made it very well known across the whole world. ...read more.

Conclusion

Also the tzar still acted like a puppet master for the prime minister in that time. The Provisional Government in Russia was perhaps the shortest government in office ever. Needless to say, the Provisional Government produced nearly no long-term effects at all. In fact, the reality is that if you ask anybody which government ruled Russia from the time of the February Revolution until the October Revolution, very few people would be able to answer that. After this provisional government was replaced by the Bolsheviks, the Russian Soviet Socialist Republic was introduced, and just four years later the Soviet Union was set up. In summary, the two revolutions were totally different in their happenings, but they had the one similarity that they were so much favored by the people of Russia because of the same reasons. While one served no particular cause, the October Revolution?s clear purpose was to overthrow Russia?s monarchy. Also the October Revolution was much more significant to the events that led up to the creation of the Soviet Union. Another difference was that the army played no role in the February Revolution, while it played a major role in the October Revolution. The one significant similarity between the two revolutions was that the people supported both of them for the same reasons. The two Russian revolutions were rather fascinating in their developments, and led to many important things in later Russian history, like in the creation of the Soviet Union. All in all, it was a great topic to write about. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. The Russian Revolution of October 1917 was potentially the most politically formative event of ...

    It is arguable to suggest that the outcomes of the Second World War that was more influential and in its turn more 'key' to 20th century international relations. Likewise, the arms race prior to 1917 was equally paralleled during the Cold War, and it is arguable to suggest that military

  2. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    The slogan "Workers' Control", first developed by Lenin in May, also struck a responsive chord amongst the industrial workers. By "workers' control" Lenin meant that workers should have access to all the financial and accounting records of the enterprises by which they were employed, and that in addition they should

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    * Poorly educated new Party members were easy to dominate. * Stalin's control over personnel through the Party secretariat permitted him to sack those who sided with the opposition. Every time a leading politician lost, this would be followed by a purge of his supporters.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    By June 4 a motley armada of ships, from liners to tugboats, had succeeded in evacuating to Britain some 220,000 British and 112,000 French soldiers. The public in Britain was unaware of the extent of the catastrophe. The press even hailed the "Miracle of Dunkirk" as victory.

  1. Why did the reforms introduced by Nicholas II after the 1905 Revolutions not prevent ...

    Reforming ministers such as Sergei Witte were distrusted by the Tsar with Nicholas II reported to have said, "Curse the Dumas, it is all Witte's doing", although these were the very concessions that had helped him survive the 1905 Revolution.

  2. Was it the continuation of the First World War the main reason for the ...

    The failure of the offensive was very significant as it immediately led to an armed uprising in Petrograd in early July known as the July days. Although he Provisional Government survived this it showed that they were losing considerable support and even the moderate socialist leaders in the government were losing credibility with both the soldiers and the workers.

  1. How significant was Lenin between the years 1902-1918 to the formation of the Bolshevik ...

    The simpletons of the Socialist-Revolutionary and Menshevik parties were jubilant and fatuously bathed in the rays of the ministerial glory of their leaders. The capitalists gleefully rubbed their hands at having found helpers against the people in the persons of the ?leaders of the Soviets? and at having secured their

  2. To what extent was the continuation of the First World War the main reason ...

    the other parties who had long, arguably unattainable aims such as waiting for a peasant proletariat to mobilize and seize power. Lenin was arguably selfish, uncompromising and only focused on his own aims. He used the Petrograd soviet as a way of gaining power, he was never committed to giving power to the Soviets as stated in his April theses.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work