• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Conservative scandals were the most important reason for why they lost in the 1964 election. Do you agree?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Conservative scandals were the most important reason for why they lost in the 1964 election. Do you agree? For the Conservatives, the loss of the 1964 election was due to a number of factors, including the scandals that affected their party's image during this time. Other factors include the Profumo affair, another more significant scandal, the leadership troubles that the Conservatives faced during this time, and a general lack of spirit from the party after a tiring 13 years in government. As well as this, Labour's growing strength played a part in their winning of the election. Scandals played a major part of 1963 for the Conservatives, with three different occurrences happening during this time. These scandals included the Vassall affair, which made the government look bad as they tried to protect a Soviet spy and ultimately protect themselves from the trouble of not catching him sooner, but it backfired and the truth was revealed to the public. This scandal would reflect badly on the MPs involved as it shows them as untrustworthy, and also links them to the Soviets and could be perceived as them trying to protect them. ...read more.

Middle

Again, the public couldn't trust a party associated so heavily with lies and scandals that shamed their entire image. As the Profumo affair was somewhat of a scandal for the Conservative party, its incredibly negative affect on their reputation agrees with the view that scandals were the cause of their loss. Another important factor was the steady decline of the Conservatives, more specifically their outdated methods of choosing a leader for the party. Potentially more suitable candidates for the job, such as Butler, were overlooked by Macmillan for politically irrelevant reasons such as a personal dislike. Douglas-Home was eventually chosen and recommended by Macmillan, showing the use of the Etonian scheme still, that the choosing of the leader was more to do with personal connections and prestige rather than actual political ability. This factor was important for their loss in the election as it angered members of the party and caused divisions within, portraying a weak and negative image to the public, making the government look tiring after their 13 years in power. ...read more.

Conclusion

These things showed how the Conservatives were tiring and losing their grip on Britain and the public would see their failures in a negative light, wanting a change and voting for Labour instead. As the scandals were a part of the Conservative decline, this also suggests that an important reason for their defeat was the general decline. In conclusion, the most important reason for Conservative loss was their growing weakness and tiring government, as well as the fact that many of the voting public just wanted a change after 13 years of the Conservatives. Many factors link together to form this, the scandals, Profumo affair, their economic and international failures which all individually portrayed a bad image to the public, together interlocking to create the negative image that they held in 1964. Although the Labour government were stronger, had the Conservatives not had scandals and divisions denting their image then they could have potentially won the election again, especially Labour only won narrowly. Conservative scandals were the most important reason for their loss, when combined with the other reasons that also made them weaker. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

****
A very good essay - it is a little light on detail but all the leads are there, they just need to be better developed and supported with persuasive evidence. The answer highlights a range of causal factors and presents them in a succinct way - many factors need to be weighed up against the historical significance of the scandals throughout the answer - there isn't always a sense of that in this answer. There are however, many good links back to the question, links between factors and some strong analytical statements. To improve the answer further, a stronger, more persuasive/rigorous interrogation of the proposition in the question would be needed.

Marked by teacher Natalie Stanley 01/03/2013

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

5 star(s)

Response to the question

The student is focused for the entire essay and proves this by addressing the terms of the question in the first few paragraphs, which shows the examiner that they have an immediate understanding and aren't struggling to find something relevant ...

Read full review

Response to the question

The student is focused for the entire essay and proves this by addressing the terms of the question in the first few paragraphs, which shows the examiner that they have an immediate understanding and aren't struggling to find something relevant to write. They discuss a wide range of different reasons for Conservative decline, which is good because they are showing they are capable of understanding more than one interpretation. One improvement they could make is to quote a historian, as this would show they have read around their subject and are able to understand academic texts as well as A Level ones. Due to a lack of books on the subject, this can be a bit difficult for a period as modern as the 1960s, but when I studied it, it was perfectly valid to quote something like an Andrew Marr book, and if you find a few general quotes on broad areas it will be easy to remember and can be used in a variety of essays (such as a quote about the economy in the 1960s could be relevant for affluence, unemployment, inflation, politicians who held the office of Chancellor, general image and so on).

Level of analysis

The student uses an excellent range of evidence, which shows they can back up their understanding of what happened with proof. The use of precise numbers - such as "they let unemployment reach 800,000" - is good because the student is demonstrating they understand what makes an unemployment figure a high one and what makes it a low one. The essay stands out as the student is able to quote several names - some students fall into the trap of just talking about Macmillan and Profumo because they were the ones the teacher had talked about the most. A problem in my class when writing about the Profumo Affair was that some students often started telling the story rather than analysing it, which is bad because anyone can simply remember details of an event (especially a scandalous one), but not everyone can say why what happened was so important. However, this student gives basic details and relevant evidence but then goes on to say why it was damaging to the Conservatives, not simply how it was damaging. For example, instead of just saying what happened during the Profumo Affair, the student explains why it was damaging to the leadership Harold Macmillan, showing the examiner that they understand what the knock-on effects were. The conclusion is excellent because it says why one reason was more important than another, which is good as examiners look for an awareness of the advantages and disadvantages of interpretations.

Quality of writing

The spelling, grammar and punctuation are excellent. The student could improve the essay by taking care over how they express themselves: at one point they say "the working class era of Britain", when in fact all eras of British history have had more than one class, and it would make more sense to miss "era" out altogether. This is the kind of mistake that would easily be picked up when checking at the end, so always leave some time in an exam to re-read what you have written. The essay would also benefit from more technical words such as "cause" that are expected at this level of qualification: instead of "which would then make them more inclined to vote for Labour", "this could cause them to vote Labour" leaves no doubt that they clearly understand the effect that one historical event has on another. That said, this is an excellent essay that would probably gain high marks.


Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by lordharvey 13/04/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Labour weakness was the most important reason for Conservative dominance from 1951 to 1964. ...

    5 star(s)

    This also links to Macmillan's promise to build 300,000 houses per year, a target which they reached, and another reason why people were so able to own their own homes. Again, this lifestyle improvement saw the public in a much better place than they had been under Labour ruling, and

  2. Marked by a teacher

    The most important reason for Wolseys fall from power was his failure to obtain ...

    5 star(s)

    In this period of time (Wolsey's later years) the King became intrigued by Anne Boleyn and started to distrust Wolsey. This was because the King wanted to divorce the current queen at the time - Catherine of Aragon - and marry Anne Boleyn. The King's divorce was dealt with by Wolsey, yet because he could not grant this he was almost immediately removed from power.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How serious a threat did the Puritans pose to Elizabeth I and her Church?

    4 star(s)

    impossible to enforce, claiming that 'Puritanism as a religious experience and mentality continued to thrive outside the court at the end of Elizabeth's reign' The vestments controversy in 1564 was the first example of public resistance to the Religious Settlement.

  2. To What Extent Were the Polices and Attitude of Charles X The Main Reason ...

    In 1829, Charles x replaced the fairly neutral Martignac ministry an extreme ultra one, headed by Polignac. Polignac was associated with the hated monarchy from before the revolution. The ministry also included Bourmont, a general who had deserted Napoleon and La Bourdonnay who had been responsible for the white terror in the reign of Louis XVIII.

  1. Why did Labour win the 1945 election and lose in the 1951 election?

    Labour's election record in the 1930s was poor, as they were disorganised and divided. Divisions over appeasement, foreign policy and rearmament deeply weakened Labour. This divided party had stood no chance against the organised, well-funded Conservatives. However by 1945 Labour was a strong, organised and well respected party, whilst the Conservatives were weakened by the war and internal splits.

  2. Henry VIII - Success or Failure?

    To determine whether Henry was successful of not, we must first think, what is a successful king? What makes an unsuccessful king? Kings and Queens such as Mary Tudor and King John have often been called failures because they were not popular.

  1. Rebellions can be seen as the greatest challenge facing Henry VIIs rule 1485-1509 Explain ...

    Henry?s weak claim to the thrown can be seen as a challenge because many citizens doubted his claim to the throne, which meant that they started rebellions or questioned his policies. England?s relationship with France posed a large challenge for Henry throughout his reign, as they were the country?s traditional rival in the middle ages.

  2. Why did Pitt dominate politics 1783-93?

    Pitt also managed to delay a General election to gain support and make sure that he would get a majority government, he gained the support by impressing MPs and his strategy meant that he was able to reduce the opposition votes and strengthen his political campaign.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work