• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the view that Henry VII defeat of the pretenders was the most important contribution factor to his security.

Extracts from this document...


Discuss the view that Henry VII defeat of the pretenders was the most important contribution factor to his security. Through the reign of Henry VII there were many dangers, which threatened to take his throne away. But once the threats were dealt with it would contribute to his security. Pretenders in henrys case were people who impersonated particular people to challenge him. The two main pretenders that had caused Henry a lot of trouble were Lambert Simnel and Perkin Warbeck. They presented such a dangerous challenge to his hold on the crown both because of their entanglement with other European states, particularly Burgundy, and because they lingered on for such a long time. Lambert Simnel was a striking resemblance of the Earl of Warwick, and so he claimed to be this grandson of Edward IV. ...read more.


Perkin Warbeck Like Lambert Simnel, claimed to be an heir to the throne of England. And like Simnel had the backing of a foreign country. This time it was France. The French King, Charles VIII was eager to distract Henry away from his designs on Brittany. In addition, Warbeck also secured Scottish aid. James IV welcomed Warbeck in 1495, marrying him to a rich Scottish aristocrat. However, in 1497, Henry renewed a truce with Scotland and James was forced to abandon his Flemish pretender. Warbeck fled to the south of England, and was arrested while trying to escape from the port of Southampton. Initially, Henry showed clemency. But he abused this clemency and was executed in November 1499. From both examples of pretenders, both have a specific point in which they have in common, they both needed the backing of foreign countries. ...read more.


Pretenders were only a small obstacle that Henry had to go through, although, it was significant because it caused a lot of trouble to Henry e.g. battle of stoke. And when it was sorted out it gave Henry a sign of relief due to the fact that it had all dragged on so much, and this may have frightened Henry as it showed how easily trouble could be caused from people with foreign support. The defeat of the pretenders is relatively important to contribute to security, as it is almost a test and Henry had to show that he could handle them, which showed he was a strong and able king. Nobles the most important contributor to security, may then admire and give respect to Henry, which in turn improves the loyalty of the nobles and reducing their misbehaviour. So it could also be argued that with respect given from the nobles due to the defeats of the pretenders the overall stability would improve. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. How dangerous were the threats to Henry VII's government?

    But once in Flanders he also got backing from his 'new' aunt - Margaret of Burgundy. Margaret provided support and money towards Warbeck's campaign. The Holy Roman Empire was not able to provide any support but recognised Warbeck to be Richard of York.

  2. How serious a threat did the pretenders pose to Henry VII's crown?

    band of followers took refuge in Burgundy, in the safety of his 'aunt' Margaret of Burgundy. Henry took decisive action and stopped all trade with Flanders , even though it threatened England's vital cloth trade. Warbeck found an even more powerful and influential backer in Maximilian (leader of the Holy

  1. Explain why Perkin Warbeck remained a threat to the security of Henry VII for ...

    whilst the 1489 Treaty of Medina del Campo with Spain led the French to encourage James IV of Scotland to invade England. It was Henry's invasion of France in 1492 which appeared to be a very drastic action with regard to this pretender - it was clear that with foreign military backing, his position could be significantly threatened.

  2. How much of a threat to Henry VII’s throne were the pretenders Lambert Simnel ...

    The execution of Sir William Stanley shows how far Henry was willing to go to protect his security as Stanley changed the course of the Battle of Bosworth and thus was one of his trusted officials. Henry's swift intelligence action meant that Warbeck's landing was a fiasco.

  1. Were the pretenders a serious threat to Henry VII's throne?

    When Simnel's forces marched to meet Henry's, they had gathered less support than expected, and were outnumbered by about 4,000 men. Simnel's entourage had been too preoccupied with gathering troops and support abroad that they had not given enough thought to the people of England and how they would react.

  2. Was Lambert Simnel a greater threat to the security of Henry VII than Perkin ...

    Unlike Warbeck, Simnel had the support of a great noble power supporting him, and that was John de La Pole, Earl of Lincoln, who was heir to Richard III. As the heir to Richard III, John de la Pole was a major potential threat to Henry VIII.

  1. Henry was threatened several times during his reign all of varying seriousness. The pretenders ...

    Warbeck was a constant threat to Henry, unlike Simnel due to his hesitance to become involved in battles. Although at points during the 8 years Warbeck was simply a nuisance in foreign affairs and therefore foreign policy at times he presented a large problem for Henry.

  2. This essay examines the actions of Charles VII in relation to events pertaining to ...

    Since she was so beloved by the public, many historians feel that Charles feared her intentions. At the peak of her success she was potentially able to do anything without the fear of facing any consequences. Although speculative, several historians believe Charles suffered from psychological neuroses including paranoia.7 Such paranoia

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work