• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do You Agree With Source A? The Problems Faced By US Soldiers In Vietnam

Extracts from this document...


Do you agree with this interpretation of the problems faced by US soldiers in Vietnam? I agree with some of Source A - the extract of Michael Bilton's book Four hours in My Lai the American soldiers were very inexperienced and young "constantly throwing inexperienced men against experienced guerrillas". At the beginning of the war people volunteered to go to Vietnam but as America became increasingly more involved people didn't have a choice and were drafted into the army. The troops only had to stay for one year but a high percentage of troops died within the first 6 months, this was because being in a combat situation was new to them. Americans were not used to guerrilla war tactics, and as a result had a distinct disadvantage. In the years of peace soldiers, had to be very clever to get into the army, but during the Vietnam war they let just about anyone in, because the numbers were low. ...read more.


It's possible but he could have collected the information from unreliable sources as well. His purpose is mixed in my opinion, in one hand he's taking the mick out of the US soldiers but he's also providing excuses about why the war happened, and why the soldiers acted as they did. I think the audience this book was meant for is Americans who are studying their history and other countries probably young adults, because it shows Michael Bilton making lots of excuses about why the Americans lost the war, and even why they went to war in the first place. It criticised the soldiers ways of operating. People were drafted in the army without a choice, black men, and poor white me were sent to Vietnam, whereas well educated white men could put off their tour of duty - which only lasted one year - if they were at university or doing a degree or something similar, it all seems very unfair. ...read more.


I don't agree with the fact that 'Soldiers were most likely to die in the first month.' Because there is contradicting evidence that says the large majority of deaths took place in the first six months, not one. I think there are many reasons to agree and disagree with this extract, however I think that I would say I agree because there is more supporting evidence for the low test scores, and the inexperienced men the things that I agree with far outweigh the things that I disagree with. Altogether though I really would prefer to read the whole book before putting forward my opinion, we are relying on a very small set of information but I believe that Michael Bilton wrote this book because he sympathised with the people who were massacred in My Lai for no reason. And they deserved better so he wants to try and focus on the bad points of what the Americans did. Laura M. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. The Vietnam War - source related questions and answers

    As well as that we need to know the specific views are i.e. the doves believe that the US government spends too much money on a foreign war instead of health care at home. Question 4: In what ways should sources 8-11 prove useful to an historian studying the AWM in the USA?

  2. I will be looking at how the U.S became increasingly involved Vietnam, the problems ...

    This would make any mother cry out in shock and naturally. The Americans ere telling people that the communists were evil and should be stopped, yet in the eyes of many Americans living at home it was the U.S burning crops and killing innocent children, and naturally this only increased anti war feelings.

  1. what the Americans did in My Lai source work

    Its intended audience was the American public during the war. It is sufficient evidence to explain why there was an anti-war movement because it is emotive, that meant that the public would read it and be more effective than if it was emotionless.

  2. Study source A. Do you agree with this interpretation of problems faced by U.S ...

    It says the soldiers were most likely to die in the first moth of being in Vietnam. I'm not too sure if this point is true because there is no hard evidence to show it. I can understand when new recruits were thrown in they would have been eager to

  1. Rationality, Educated Opinion and Peace

    The discerning public thus does not only take into account what is right, but also what is most practical in catering to self-interest. Carr then adopts an argument that is parallel to Thomas Hobbes'. Hobbes, in Leviathan, states the fundamental law of nature as: it is a precept, or general

  2. American History.

    It seemed hopeless to resist. But Patrick Henry, a member of the Virginia House of Burgesses, was not prepared to give up easily and instead wrote the Virginia Stamp Act Resolves. - The resolves were passed [though some of the most radical sections were taken out].

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work