• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do you agree with the view that in the years before the First World War, there was willing and widespread Indian cooperation to British rule?

Extracts from this document...


History Key Assignment Cover Sheet Name: Selina Date: Ly Essay Title: Do you agree with the view that in the years before the First World War, there was willing and widespread Indian cooperation to British rule? Word Count (excluding references): 1070 Feedback from previous essay: (ï¼ below) I have acted on feedback from my previous essay I have planned the essay carefully prior to writing yep My essay is structured properly – it has an introduction, organised paragraphs and a conclusion yep I have read over the essay carefully and corrected any spelling/grammatical/factual errors yep I have included footnotes yep I have included a bibliography with at least three books / articles no Do you agree with the view that in the years before the First World War, there was willing and widespread Indian cooperation to British rule? It can be argued that in the years before the First World War, there was willing and widespread cooperation from the Indians to British rule. Even though there was a lot of dispute between the Indians about the partition of Bengal, many Indians stayed loyal and cooperated with British rule and their ideals; source 1 certainly argues with this. However sources 2 and 3 present that fact that there was some cooperation but not entirely; it was up to the Indians whether they cooperated with British rule or not. ...read more.


Moreover the way Piers Brendon describes the way the Indians reacted towards the visit, from King George V, suggest that not only were they pleased to see him but were honoured and saw it as almost sacred, ?salaamed to the ground, threw dust on their heads, and the women made a guttural sound in their throats which is always kept for the temple.?[8] This goes against source 1?s interpretation of Indian cooperation as it shows them respecting British rule and honouring it. However half way through the source Bredon agues that critics of British rule stated to retaliate, they said ?festivity insulted poverty and that frivolity diminished dignity?[9] this showed that they didn?t like how the British were influencing the people of India; festivals offended the poor and playfulness destroyed their dignity. Even though some Indians, the Hindus, were pleased with the reunification of Bengal ?Muslims were horrified?[10] which made them rebel ?it rivalled them in violence?[11] this resulted in the Viceroy being badly injured. This demonstrates how violent some Indians and the fact that the viceroy was ?injured by a bomb attack?[12] shows just how violent they got showing the small amount of people who actually cooperated with the British rule. The fact that the book this source was taken from is called ?The Decline and Fall of the British Empire? shows that the British rule in India did fall but whether ...read more.


The Indian national congress were against British rule because they felt rejected by the British and knew they weren?t being treated equally to the British; ?The reality was that Indian nationalism was not fuelled by the poverty of the many, but by the rejection of the privileged few.?[16] Showing the lack of cooperation from the Indians, which is supported by the evidence in source 1, where it says that nationalists were attacked by the police on order from the British. In conclusion, the three sources largely disagree with the statement that before the First World War there was willing and widespread Indian cooperation to British rule. They only have small bits of information about whether India cooperated with Britain and they only talked about certain event which occurred during the time before the First World War not their overall cooperation. Thus proving that, there wasn?t much willing and widespread Indian cooperation as only certain groups of Indians actually wanted to support the British. ________________ [1] Stanley Wolpert, A New History of India, published in 1977 [2] Ibid. [3] Ibid. [4] Ibid. [5] Idid. [6] Idid. [7] Piers Brendon, The Decline and Fall of the British Empire, 1781 ? 1997, published in 2007 [8] Ibid. [9] Ibid. [10] Ibid. [11] Ibid. [12] Ibid. [13] Niall Ferguson, Empire, published 2003 [14] Ibid. [15] Ibid. [16] Ibid. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. Revision Table - Tudor Rebellions

    * Promise of parliament being called to air rebel's grievances. * Small monasteries restored. * End to subsidy collections * Rents fixed. * Henry more cautious theologically. Failure * Cromwell still there. * Dissolution of monasteries continues. * Henry remains as head of church.

  2. The British Raj has lasted many centuries and led to numerous transformations in the ...

    By providing employment, India's economy advance even higher. Employment in India helped the economy in many ways. By providing jobs many people had the opportunity to work and make money for their family. It also kept the country out of recession. Before the Britain rule there were not a lot of jobs open to the country.

  1. The Third English Civil War

    Dunbar On the August 28, Cromwell fell back on Musselburgh, and on August 31, after embarking his non-effective men, to Dunbar. Leslie followed him up, and wished to fight a battle at Dunbar on Sunday, the 1st of September. But again the kirk intervened, this time to forbid Leslie to

  2. Why Were Some Forms Of Nationalism More Successful Than Others In Achieving Concessions From ...

    This only served to elevate Parnell's prestige but the increase in violence that followed was not only a threat to the government but also a threat to Parnell's leadership of the movement. Therefore in April 1882, the Kilmainham Treaty was signed as Parnell was released, coercion relaxed, and his demands on the land question were met.

  1. The First English Civil War

    brought the religious issue to the front. The Presbyterian system, even more rigid than that of the Archbishop of Canterbury, William Laud, and the other bishops, whom no man on either side save Charles himself supported, was destined to be supplanted by the Independents, and their ideal of free conscience.

  2. The Indian Mutiny

    know people from their country still had the official power, though later this was not enough for the British and they introduced Annexation, a method where the company would claim the province by introducing troops and "attaching" themselves to the land, meaning native rulers were simply disposed of.

  1. Louis XIV's fondness of war resulted his downfall

    Louis' inability to read this situation and continue his advances in to the German states. Leopold, who was the Holy Roman Emperor, of course saw this as a challenge to his authority. This though was an example of Louis not being able to predict the moves of his opposition and

  2. In the context of India in the 1840s to 1947, how far can independence ...

    his own conduct in other respects, and it is one of the points where I have found myself in painful disagreement.?[13] Subsequently, in 1916 the collaborative agreement between the INC and the Muslim League, the Lucknow Pact, aimed to give the Indian people more authority in the running of their own country.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work