• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do you agree with the view that in the years before the First World War, there was willing and widespread Indian cooperation to British rule?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Key Assignment Cover Sheet Name: Selina Date: Ly Essay Title: Do you agree with the view that in the years before the First World War, there was willing and widespread Indian cooperation to British rule? Word Count (excluding references): 1070 Feedback from previous essay: (ï¼ below) I have acted on feedback from my previous essay I have planned the essay carefully prior to writing yep My essay is structured properly – it has an introduction, organised paragraphs and a conclusion yep I have read over the essay carefully and corrected any spelling/grammatical/factual errors yep I have included footnotes yep I have included a bibliography with at least three books / articles no Do you agree with the view that in the years before the First World War, there was willing and widespread Indian cooperation to British rule? It can be argued that in the years before the First World War, there was willing and widespread cooperation from the Indians to British rule. Even though there was a lot of dispute between the Indians about the partition of Bengal, many Indians stayed loyal and cooperated with British rule and their ideals; source 1 certainly argues with this. However sources 2 and 3 present that fact that there was some cooperation but not entirely; it was up to the Indians whether they cooperated with British rule or not. ...read more.

Middle

Moreover the way Piers Brendon describes the way the Indians reacted towards the visit, from King George V, suggest that not only were they pleased to see him but were honoured and saw it as almost sacred, ?salaamed to the ground, threw dust on their heads, and the women made a guttural sound in their throats which is always kept for the temple.?[8] This goes against source 1?s interpretation of Indian cooperation as it shows them respecting British rule and honouring it. However half way through the source Bredon agues that critics of British rule stated to retaliate, they said ?festivity insulted poverty and that frivolity diminished dignity?[9] this showed that they didn?t like how the British were influencing the people of India; festivals offended the poor and playfulness destroyed their dignity. Even though some Indians, the Hindus, were pleased with the reunification of Bengal ?Muslims were horrified?[10] which made them rebel ?it rivalled them in violence?[11] this resulted in the Viceroy being badly injured. This demonstrates how violent some Indians and the fact that the viceroy was ?injured by a bomb attack?[12] shows just how violent they got showing the small amount of people who actually cooperated with the British rule. The fact that the book this source was taken from is called ?The Decline and Fall of the British Empire? shows that the British rule in India did fall but whether ...read more.

Conclusion

The Indian national congress were against British rule because they felt rejected by the British and knew they weren?t being treated equally to the British; ?The reality was that Indian nationalism was not fuelled by the poverty of the many, but by the rejection of the privileged few.?[16] Showing the lack of cooperation from the Indians, which is supported by the evidence in source 1, where it says that nationalists were attacked by the police on order from the British. In conclusion, the three sources largely disagree with the statement that before the First World War there was willing and widespread Indian cooperation to British rule. They only have small bits of information about whether India cooperated with Britain and they only talked about certain event which occurred during the time before the First World War not their overall cooperation. Thus proving that, there wasn?t much willing and widespread Indian cooperation as only certain groups of Indians actually wanted to support the British. ________________ [1] Stanley Wolpert, A New History of India, published in 1977 [2] Ibid. [3] Ibid. [4] Ibid. [5] Idid. [6] Idid. [7] Piers Brendon, The Decline and Fall of the British Empire, 1781 ? 1997, published in 2007 [8] Ibid. [9] Ibid. [10] Ibid. [11] Ibid. [12] Ibid. [13] Niall Ferguson, Empire, published 2003 [14] Ibid. [15] Ibid. [16] Ibid. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. Revision Table - Tudor Rebellions

    * Promise of parliament being called to air rebel's grievances. * Small monasteries restored. * End to subsidy collections * Rents fixed. * Henry more cautious theologically. Failure * Cromwell still there. * Dissolution of monasteries continues. * Henry remains as head of church.

  2. Cities were the main driving force of the Reformation in Germany(TM) " explain whether ...

    In order for Lutheranism to survive following the Edict of Worms, it would need both the support and the protection of the Princes. Therefore, as a result of Lutheranism gaining followers, from the attraction of a broad message, some Princes began to alter their opinions of Lutheranism and support the movement.

  1. The Indian Mutiny

    know people from their country still had the official power, though later this was not enough for the British and they introduced Annexation, a method where the company would claim the province by introducing troops and "attaching" themselves to the land, meaning native rulers were simply disposed of.

  2. Gandhi was instrumental in India achieving its independence. Gandhi was able to procure Indias ...

    It is because the poor in India saw Gandhi's caring that they were willing to help and follow him. With these new found numbers India become increasingly hard to suppress. Gandhi did not stop at the poor he went a caste lower to the untouchables, a caste that was thought to be less then human.

  1. To What Extent Was The South African War (1899 - 1902) A Capitalist War

    He continues to expose Rhodes as a capitalist with his description of the greatest Rand Lord as a 'millionaire, a king of finance (and) the man who was mainly responsible for the Anglo-Boer War.' This theory argues that when a capitalist nation has reached the absolute peak of capitalism then

  2. The First English Civil War

    make head of themselves against the various forces of royalism, for the most moderate men of either party were sufficiently in sympathy to admit compromise. But the backbone of resistance was the Puritan element, and this waging war at first with the rest on the political issue, soon (as the Royalists anticipated)

  1. To What Extent was World War Two the Key Turning Point in Britain's Relationship ...

    The British Empire did shrink during and after World War Two, especially in the Far East. However, there are also places where it remained strong; Britain showed no inclination to decolonise in Africa and the same strong feelings of Nationalism present in some colonies was not found in Africa.

  2. To what extent could the Crusades be described as failure within the years 1095-1195?

    ?The Crusaders Empire? was stretching from Edessa in the north to the Gulf of Aqaba in the south. Conquest in the first crusade did not mean the end of the fight. It was only a temporary truce, as the East still lived more Muslims than Christians.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work