• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Henry VI's weakness as a King Directly Led to the outbreak of war in 1455.

Extracts from this document...


Henry VI's weakness as a King Directly Led to the outbreak of war in 1455. How far do you agree? By Harrison Cartmer-Edwards I believe that Henry VI's weakness as a king directly led to the outbreak of war in 1455. By the 1450's England was taking steps back after the leaps forward in welfare and expansion made by his predecessors Edward III and Henry . This was nearly fully due to Henry VI's weak personality, which resulted in poor political control, which directly led to the over mighty nobles, who had the military and financial power to challenge even the king himself. So as a direct result, due to Henry VI's weak and uninspiring reign, incredible powerful nobles could, and felt they needed to change the regime by force. The first strong factor towards the outbreak of war was that Henry VI was an extremely weak king. He didn't possess any of the qualities a good strong King should have, such as Chivalry, a grasp of politics and commanding talent. So at the beginning of his Reign he was already at a disadvantage and was easily manipulated by other nobles in his council, who were already very independent and powerful "By 1255 Henry VI had become a pathetic puppet of faction". ...read more.


for the throne, and was then executed for treason, to which Richard of York must have hated Henry VI for. However this was another generation, and wouldn't have been Richard's main grudge against Henry VI, but unfortunately for Henry, during his reign he angered Richard of York several times. For example in 1447 Richard of York was removed from the Normandy Command and sent to Ireland, which was an act by Henry VI to suppress Richard. Furthermore Richard of York's old position of Command in Normandy was given to his arch-rival, Duke of Somerset, which on top of the humiliation of losing his post in France, was a cruel final slap in the face for Richard. What must have killed him most of all was the denial to come to the aid of Normandy under the Command of Somerset, which as a result fell into French hands. So the King denied him the ability to save the land where he had help secure and keep safe for many years. Due to Richard's increasing resentment towards the Henry VI, the King tried to satisfy/pacify York for good, by giving him the Welsh Marshes. This backfire astronomically, as due to its location being far away from Westminster, fewer feudal taxes were collected, which allowed Richard of York's profits to soar, effectively making him the second wealthiest man in England. ...read more.


So due to this loss of valuable territory, it shook the faith towards the King, which may have been the reason towards the inclination, to go against the crown in the wars to come. The whole Loss of Normandy can be put on Henry VI, considering he hired weak military generals, and didn't fund the forces and defences properly, instead spending a large portion of money on funding Eton College, leaving the French boarders weak and vulnerable. To conclude, considering the four factors, it is crystal clear that Henry VI weakness as a King directly led to the outbreak of war in 1455. He was unable to understand politics, military priorities and the nations finance, and as a result spelt the beginning of the end of his reign. He put England into consistent decline, with the loss of Normandy, huge economic debt to "Overmighty Nobles" who as a result came back to bite him and allowing feuds among the Nobility without intervention, this all combines gave reason towards the outbreak of war in 1455 as the military powerful Nobles lost all faith in their King, and had the resources to do something about it, war. "The wars occurred in the circumstances created by Henry's mental incapacity" ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Henry II (1154 - 1189) is generally seen as the main catalyst in the ...

    Yale Law School: Documents in Law, History and Diplomacy, located under http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/Avalon/Avalon.htm indicates texts of classics such as Blackstone' Commentaries [Visited 12/10/2002] 1 Smith & Keenan's English Law [1993] 10th Edition Chapter 1 The nature and development of English law pages 3-4, Pitman Publishing.

  2. Warner Bros.' GoodFellas (1990) is director Martin Scorsese's stylistic masterpiece - a follow-up film ...

    without any outsiders: We always did everything together and we always were in the same crowd. Anniversaries, christenings. We only went to each other's houses. The women played cards, and when the kids were born, Mickey and Jimmy were always the first at the hospital.

  1. 'Oh, pity, God, this miserable age!' The theme of war in Henry VI to ...

    The contrast is accentuated by the debate, which dwells on the antitheses of 'shadow' and 'substance'. The situation is resolved when Talbot demonstrates that his substance is a host of individual soldiers all bent on the same purpose. The revelation is made more poignant by the imagery of bodily parts in 'arms', 'legs', 'sinews' and the like.

  2. Wives & War: To what extent did these two aspects undermine Henry VIIIs rule ...

    in the public eye (Hutchinson 2005, pg 13), his whole physical appearance changed with his waist increasing by 19 inches from 1520 (Starkey 2002, pg100). Although Henry became an individual uneasy on the eye he still managed to have three more wives in 1540 to 1547.

  1. Within the context of the period 1337-1471, to what extent can Henry VI be ...

    The English Chronicle that was published in the 1460s stated that Henry ?was simple and led by a covetous council? and ?that puppet of a king?. Henry is often criticised for relying too heavily on his council, and continuing to support their decisions.

  2. How far was the outbreak of the civil war in 1455 due to the ...

    The surrender of Rouen was a treasonable offence and York was dishonoured because of this, despite not being there in person to defend. York demanded Somerset be tried for the treasonable surrender of Rouen and other towns in order to clear his name.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work