• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How effective was Henry VII as a monarch?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How effective was Henry VII as a Monarch? Throughout the course of Henry's reign, there were various uprisings against him, not only because he was a usurper to the throne, but also because he had very little history in England. In 1485-86 there were few minor risings in the Midlands and the North, which were of little significance and were dealt with efficiently; Henry showed his seriousness through the execution of Humphrey Stafford after his treacherousness. A more serious threat than the aforementioned was the situation surrounding Lambert Simnel, which was potentially very serious as it led to the Battle of Stoke in 1487. However, after three hours of intense battle the King's army had the Yorkists surrounded, and most of the key leaders were killed. Again, to show his seriousness Henry charged 28 of the opposing nobles with attainder and sentenced Symonds, the orchestrator, to life imprisonment. In 1489 there was a rebellion in York which was a relatively small tax opposed rebellion which Henry was able to deal with, aided by the Earl of Surrey, who defeated the rebels. Here the King used calculated clemency, as he issued pardons to many of the prisoners as a gesture of conciliation to prevent further uprisings. ...read more.

Middle

As well as this, Henry achieved prosperity for his merchants as the trade tariffs between England and Spain were removed. Whilst the treaty of Medina del Campo did have its drawbacks, for example Henry having 'the worst of the bargain', as regaining Normandy and Aquitaine was impractical and unrealistic, he was willing to ignore this so he could reap the benefits of being recognised as an equal by the Catholic Monarchs. The second major treaty was the Treaty of Etaples, signed in 1492 with France. Again, Henry was able to achieve his main aims; security - through Charles' promise to no longer aid any English rebels, money - through the sizeable annual pension from �5000, and recognition as a good monarch, as he was able to establish good terms with France, who had been a traditional enemy of England. The third major treaty was signed with Scotland in 1497, the Truce of Ayton established good terms between England and Scotland, who, like France, had been traditional English enemies for centuries. The main outcomes of this truce were that Henry was able to secure his position, through James IV's promise not to aid any more rebels, and through a marriage seal between James and Henry's eldest daughter, Margaret. ...read more.

Conclusion

All of these policies that were put in place may suggest that Henry had an agenda to deliberately quell the nobility, however it has been argued that nobles still enjoyed much wealth and not much changed for them. I support the view that Henry was conscious of the noble's threat and took the appropriate measures to make sure that they did not step out of line, however, I do not believe that he followed an anti-noble policy as such. In terms of effectiveness, Henry certainly managed to curb the nobility's power, through these various policies, the most important, perhaps, being his financial threats against the nobles, which acted as an example to anybody else who was thinking of abusing their position. In conclusion, the King managed to effectively deal with all rebellions that he came across; although some threats were potentially dangerous he was able to deal these, overall, in a very efficient manner. Similarly, Henry's foreign policy was able to achieve his main aims, with security being the most important of these. Lastly, the King developed several policies that effectively limited the power of the nobility in such a manner that he was able to diminish potential threats. These points being considered, Henry was a very efficient monarch when taking into consideration the instability of his position. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Essay: How serious was the Yorkist threat to Henry VII?

    After futile attempts to receive Irish support proved unsuccessful, Warbeck travelled to France in 1492, and King Charles VIII welcomed him as a prince. Using Warbeck as a bargaining tool, Charles signed the Treaty of Etaples in 1492, meaning Henry accepted France's control of Brittany and Charles expelled Warbeck from France, as the treaty stated neither could shelter rebels.

  2. Securing the Tudor Dynasty: The Reign of Henry VII.

    Also in the same year the Cornish rebellion gathered only Lord Audley, the only noble of any importance involved in the rebellion. Showing that Henry had acquired the allegiance from his Nobles required to keep his throne stable. Henry's domestic policy has to take credit for this instated loyalty, with a large slice of luck to accompany it.

  1. How Secure was Henry VII?

    was afraid of the nobility and their private armies, however by giving them rewards for good behavior and punishments for bad behavior would hopefully have put them in the right direction. Finance was important during Henry reign as without money there was no army and with no army there was no defense from attack.

  2. "Throughout his reign, Henry VII deliberately pursued an anti-noble policy." Discuss

    The new policies made by Henry could be portrayed in two main ways. The first being that he was an anti - noble king, the other being that the policies reflect "...suspicion and real paranoid megalomania" 2 This essay will firstly examine the anti - noble views.

  1. Henry VII and His Money.

    If there were times in the past when English kingship seemed weak it was because weak men sat on the throne; men who were incapable of managing the powers that were attached to the position, and who were unable to control subjects who tried to usurp various powers which belonged to it.

  2. This essay examines the actions of Charles VII in relation to events pertaining to ...

    9 According to Edward Lucie-Smith, Charles desperately wanted to prove himself as a good king regardless of the Treaty of Troyes which disinherited his claim to the French throne. The lack of affection demonstrated by his parents has been hypothesized as a catalyst to his need for perpetual reassurance; he

  1. Was Lambert Simnel a greater threat to the security of Henry VII than Perkin ...

    This is shown by Margaret equipping Simnel with 2000 experienced troops under the equally experienced Martin Schwarz. Simnel also gained more foreign support from Fitz Gerald, the Earl Kildare who supported Simnel as Henry had failed to acknowledge his position as deputy in Ireland, therefore, alienating crucial elements in Irish society which was a failure for Henry.

  2. Was Henry VII a successful monarch?

    Henry knew that if he wanted to restore political stability, law and order and ensure his new-found dynasty was to be more long-lived than his predecessors, he would need to control the nobility. Perhaps the most important way to do this was defeat any claimants to the English throne still

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work