• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How effective was Henry VII as a monarch?

Extracts from this document...


How effective was Henry VII as a Monarch? Throughout the course of Henry's reign, there were various uprisings against him, not only because he was a usurper to the throne, but also because he had very little history in England. In 1485-86 there were few minor risings in the Midlands and the North, which were of little significance and were dealt with efficiently; Henry showed his seriousness through the execution of Humphrey Stafford after his treacherousness. A more serious threat than the aforementioned was the situation surrounding Lambert Simnel, which was potentially very serious as it led to the Battle of Stoke in 1487. However, after three hours of intense battle the King's army had the Yorkists surrounded, and most of the key leaders were killed. Again, to show his seriousness Henry charged 28 of the opposing nobles with attainder and sentenced Symonds, the orchestrator, to life imprisonment. In 1489 there was a rebellion in York which was a relatively small tax opposed rebellion which Henry was able to deal with, aided by the Earl of Surrey, who defeated the rebels. Here the King used calculated clemency, as he issued pardons to many of the prisoners as a gesture of conciliation to prevent further uprisings. ...read more.


As well as this, Henry achieved prosperity for his merchants as the trade tariffs between England and Spain were removed. Whilst the treaty of Medina del Campo did have its drawbacks, for example Henry having 'the worst of the bargain', as regaining Normandy and Aquitaine was impractical and unrealistic, he was willing to ignore this so he could reap the benefits of being recognised as an equal by the Catholic Monarchs. The second major treaty was the Treaty of Etaples, signed in 1492 with France. Again, Henry was able to achieve his main aims; security - through Charles' promise to no longer aid any English rebels, money - through the sizeable annual pension from �5000, and recognition as a good monarch, as he was able to establish good terms with France, who had been a traditional enemy of England. The third major treaty was signed with Scotland in 1497, the Truce of Ayton established good terms between England and Scotland, who, like France, had been traditional English enemies for centuries. The main outcomes of this truce were that Henry was able to secure his position, through James IV's promise not to aid any more rebels, and through a marriage seal between James and Henry's eldest daughter, Margaret. ...read more.


All of these policies that were put in place may suggest that Henry had an agenda to deliberately quell the nobility, however it has been argued that nobles still enjoyed much wealth and not much changed for them. I support the view that Henry was conscious of the noble's threat and took the appropriate measures to make sure that they did not step out of line, however, I do not believe that he followed an anti-noble policy as such. In terms of effectiveness, Henry certainly managed to curb the nobility's power, through these various policies, the most important, perhaps, being his financial threats against the nobles, which acted as an example to anybody else who was thinking of abusing their position. In conclusion, the King managed to effectively deal with all rebellions that he came across; although some threats were potentially dangerous he was able to deal these, overall, in a very efficient manner. Similarly, Henry's foreign policy was able to achieve his main aims, with security being the most important of these. Lastly, the King developed several policies that effectively limited the power of the nobility in such a manner that he was able to diminish potential threats. These points being considered, Henry was a very efficient monarch when taking into consideration the instability of his position. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Essay: How serious was the Yorkist threat to Henry VII?

    After futile attempts to receive Irish support proved unsuccessful, Warbeck travelled to France in 1492, and King Charles VIII welcomed him as a prince. Using Warbeck as a bargaining tool, Charles signed the Treaty of Etaples in 1492, meaning Henry accepted France's control of Brittany and Charles expelled Warbeck from France, as the treaty stated neither could shelter rebels.

  2. Henry VII achieved the aims of his foreign policy. Comment

    When Isabella of Castile died in 1504 Spain was once again divided. Ferdinand and Henry were now rivals in the marriage market. Due to relations when it was unified, both Aragon and Castile were friendly with England and as Prince Arthur died, Catherine of Aragon was set to marry the new heir to England, Henry (would become Henry VIII).

  1. Securing the Tudor Dynasty: The Reign of Henry VII.

    Henry needed his Nobles to fight for him and know that they would not support the claimants. This importance of loyalty is shown in 1597 when Warbeck tried to invade England through Scotland and picked up little at all support especially from any of the Northern Nobles.

  2. Changes in Crime and Punishment.

    Tribunals had been set up to examine the reason for why some people did not want to fight in the war. As a last resort some men were even sent to prison. Conscientious Objectors were given alternative work. The British people were less tolerant than the government.

  1. This essay examines the actions of Charles VII in relation to events pertaining to ...

    Their continual victories meant seniority which was invaluable to negotiations with the Burgundians. The suspicions concerning Joan were impacting Charles as his jealousy resulted from his own insecurities about himself and his capabilities as a leader.16 This opinion is further illustrated by Anne Denieul-Cormier.

  2. How was Isabella able to secure her succession to the Castilian throne in 1469-1479?

    It took until about 1480 before she could relax a little, safe in the knowledge that she had majority support. That said, once a town or city had established an allegiance with her crown, royal presence was deemed necessary, if only to remind citizens of the unwritten deal they had made with Isabella.

  1. Henry VII and His Money.

    In Italy at this time there was a man called Niccolo Machiavelli who was shortly to write a book which was to become one of the most famous or notorious of its time. Machiavelli was an Italian diplomat and politician, and he dedicated this book The Prince to Lorenzo the Magnificent.

  2. Was Henry VII a successful monarch?

    Henry knew that if he wanted to restore political stability, law and order and ensure his new-found dynasty was to be more long-lived than his predecessors, he would need to control the nobility. Perhaps the most important way to do this was defeat any claimants to the English throne still

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work