• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do the sources support the conclusion that during the period 1815-1918 the British Parliamentary system was only reformed when those in power feared violence of revolution?

Extracts from this document...


How far do the sources support the conclusion that during the period 1815-1918 the British Parliamentary system was only reformed when those in power feared violence of revolution? All of the sources give evidences of different view at the time of reform from 1815-1918. Some of the sources also show how reform happened around the time of violence and the threat of revolution; this would suggest either a weak government or an unhappy public. Sources two is a great example of the government's fear of revolution and how the government has supposedly lost support to the revolutionaries. Sources two goes as far as admitting to the fear of revolution, "I oppose universal suffrage because I think it would produces a destructive revolution" he goes on to say why; "it is our best security against a revolution" this speech is one of the strongest speeches supporting reform which leads to the fact that it is not trustworthy because of the reason in which it was written. ...read more.


This shows Lord Cranborn criticizing the way that the ministers are giving in to the masses through fear of violence, but what he is saying could be to get a Gladstone and the content of the speech might not be entirely accurate. Cranborn asserts that it was "the mobs who beat down the palings of Hyde Park" who converted his party to reform. He opposed reform as ministers would become "the slaves of the majority" and would be "driven" by the electorate. The significances of this source it that it shows Cranborn and two other ministers are resigning over this reform bill because of the weakness of the government, but the real reason could be just to defy is own party. The source was written in a very angry tone making the context in which it was written to be exaggerated but the sources is still trustworthy enough to support the question. Source five lists the failures and problems of 1815-1914, the source says "In 1917 the Russian revolution would provide a chilling model of what happened when direct action ...read more.


He also refers to "the scheme of parliament reform in 1917", implying that plans for parliamentary reform were on the agenda before the Russian revolution, all this leads to that fact that it was the fear of violence that caused reform in the end and not the need for change. As this sources is some one opinion and was written in 1994 whether it is reliable or not will effect as to whether it is credible enough to support the question, the evidences suggests that it is reliable but does not fully support the question Each sources provides a clear pattern of how violence over the century had influenced reform but was not always the cause of it. The sources do support the conclusion to the extent that they do provide evidences to suggest that reform was undertakes to prevent violence but reform did occur when their was no threat of at all. Which shows that there was the fear of violence's. 04/05/07 History 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays


    * TU movement increased from c. 1 million (1867) to 4 million (1914) and was now financing the Labour Party. * Working class men were being elected to Parliament; some (Keir Hardie, Ramsay MacDonald, Philip Snowden) had originally applied to the Liberal Party but on being refused had turned to the emerging Labour movement.

  2. Why did the campaign for Parliamentary Reform fail to achieve anything in the Period ...

    reform meaning he would use his power to stop any such reform, which in turn led to the formation of the Rockingham Whigs who sought to undermine parliamentary support for Lord North ('servant' to the King), but due to royal disproval they could not form a stable ministry.

  1. Henry II (1154 - 1189) is generally seen as the main catalyst in the ...

    The National Archives Learning Curve Education on the Internet & Teaching History Online Henry II http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/MEDhenryII.htm [Visited 11/12/2002] 43. Stubbs W , ed Select Charters of English Constitutional History, (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1913) page 189 , reprinted in Roy C Cave & Herbert H.

  2. Within the context of 1880-1980, to what extent did British actions accelerate British decolonisation ...

    colonies were up to: put bluntly, the new threat of nuclear inhalation seemed more important than the political shortcomings of, say, Somalia. While WW2 does spell out more crucial factors for the acceleration of decolonisation, the Cold War is another smaller factor which just added to the need to decolonise.

  1. "Above all, the government feared a re-enactment of the French revolution on British soil" ...

    The Radicals where very popular among the working and middle classes and even though many of their publications were banned by the government they're following grew considerably at the beginning of the 19th century. The main reason for the popularity of the radicals was the works of the four main leaders.

  2. Industrial Revolution

    It was a society of migrants, often far removed from their geographical roots: in 1911, only 58 per cent of the Rhondda's people had been born in Glamorgan. The rest of Wales supplied 19 per cent, England 7 per cent.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work