• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do the sources support the idea that Germany was warlike and aggressive in its foreign policy in the years 1899-1914?

Extracts from this document...


Coursework assignment How far do the sources support the idea that Germany was warlike and aggressive in its foreign policy in the years 1899-1914? This essay aims to examine the rather controversial view the Great War, was a result of Germanys aggressive and warlike foreign policies. The period under examination is 1899-1914, and this time period is crucial for understanding the origins of the First World War. A main area focused on, and will thoroughly discussed, using relevant sources from that particular time period, is how Germanys warlike and aggressive policy created and unstable environment, which it could be argued had led to war. But what this essay will try and determine, is whether or not world war one was the collective responsibility of all the European powers, or whether the war was solely the accountability of Germanys attitudes to other European powers in the years leading up to the war. Germany was built, one may argue, from war and hostility between France and Prussia. Before it was formed as a country with united states, it was once a large state (Prussia), which had smaller disunited states littered around Prussia. Later, due to the direct influence of Otto Von Bismarck (German chancellor forced to resign by Kaiser Wilhelm in the year 1890), Prussia then joined with the smaller states to form one nation; Germany. ...read more.


However, some may argue that Germany was very threatening and was so abrasive in its foreign policies because they wanted to become all-powerful (even more so than any other of the powers). Another argument could be that Germany constantly wanted to go to war. A good example (some may argue) that Germany wanted to go to war was the vast amount of money that was going on building German armies and navies. Germany was gearing all of its strength on the investment and building of arms, in a desperate attempt to win the arms race. However, Britain was winning, because although Germany had the best raw materials to produce good quality arms. Germany did not have a good as manufacturing process as the British. The building up of arms, armies and navies are clearly evident in sources one and six, which both show that Germany was putting capital into building up arms. Source six is a table of army and Naval money investment (as an estimate), which were possibly published in a school textbook). Source six shows how German money spent on the army and navy had doubled in the years 1910-1914. Germanys investment on army and navy had possibly intensified because of the Von schleiffen plan, which intensified relations between, Germany, France and Russia. Germany thought that without a strong army and strong navy; Germany would be a weak power. ...read more.


After analysing all of the relevant sources for the study of the origins of the First World War, the conclusion drawn, would be that Germany was certainly warlike and aggressive in its foreign policies. However, the feeling is that Germany was not the only European nation who was warlike and aggressive. After reading the available sources, it would appear that the First World War was not solely the responsibility of Germany, but a collective responsibility of all the European powers. Each nation was as wary of the other. If one nation made a slight advance, then the other nation would feel threatened or suspicious. The main issue is that, Germany was only warlike and aggressive because they felt vulnerable as a newly formed successful nation, and that they were as paranoid as the other powers were. The paranoia and vulnerability is noticeably evident in the studied sources (one and three). The suspicion and threat felt by the other powers (mainly Britain) at Germanys power are plainly apparent in the sources considered (two and three). The powers were only suspicious of Germany because Germany had immense supremacy to other throw other nations, and they were to some extent frightening as a fighting force. Germany was only warlike and aggressive as a means of self-defence and retaliation, not as a means to beat and gain a larger empire. But as the other nations grew more suspicious, an even more unstable nature was created which lead to war. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    Machine guns * The machine gun was one of the most important weapons of the war. At first the British army did not take it seriously, each battalion had only two machine-guns in August 1914. This was increased to four by Kitchener, but in 1915 Lloyd George raised the number to 64.

  2. How far was Germany responsible for the outbreak of war in 1914?

    Whether it was intentional or not, Germany did have to face the possibility of fighting a war on two separate fronts at the same time. However it was not true encirclement as they had Austria Hungary to the south and an outlet to the North Atlantic Ocean to the North,

  1. To What extent was German Foreign Policy responsible for the outbreak of general European ...

    To quote the historian James Joll "they believed that the more decisive the Austrian action was and the firmer Germany's backing of her ally the less likely the Russians would be to intervene". The issue of German support is also crucial because the Kaiser sent a 'blank cheque' to the

  2. American economic foreign policy and the origins of the cold war

    Having underlined the main intentions behind American foreign economic policy in the 1940s, we move now to an explanation of its connection with the outbreak of the Cold War. Although unwise to assign all blame on American determination to create an "open door" world economy, its endeavor clearly aggravated Soviet-American relations.

  1. Consider How Far Gladstone And Disraeli Differed In Their Policies Regarding The British Empire ...

    Gladstone and Disraeli had differing opinions over Russia. Disraeli regarded her as more of a threat than Gladstone did, perhaps due to the fact that disliking Russia was a traditional British view, which were the views that Disraeli tended to follow.

  2. Mao was essentially more successful in his domestic policies for China, then he was ...

    And each brigade contained around 200 households. The whole system was controlled from the PRC's central government and prices, distribution and farming methods were given from above. In the five year plan, Mao did not have to many concerns of the people that is why he also abandoned independent harvesting.

  1. Reasons for the increasing support given to NSDAP by the German people in the ...

    Hitler himself used this method quite masterfully in his speeches. When he spoke to the workers he would complain about foreign exploiters, Jewish capitalists and promise the end of unemployment. If the audience were members of an exclusive industrial club, he would rage against communism and promise to keep the unions under control.

  2. To what extent can Britain's policy towards Germanybefore Munichbe defended?

    Their foreign policy was lacking any firmness or purpose and was hardly a policy at all. They had neither applied themselves to the cause of treaty revision nor had they stood by the obligations imposed upon them by existing treaties, and it was left to the ill-fated Chamberlain to try and rescue British policy.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work