• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do the sources support the idea that Germany was warlike and aggressive in its foreign policy in the years 1899-1914?

Extracts from this document...


Coursework assignment How far do the sources support the idea that Germany was warlike and aggressive in its foreign policy in the years 1899-1914? This essay aims to examine the rather controversial view the Great War, was a result of Germanys aggressive and warlike foreign policies. The period under examination is 1899-1914, and this time period is crucial for understanding the origins of the First World War. A main area focused on, and will thoroughly discussed, using relevant sources from that particular time period, is how Germanys warlike and aggressive policy created and unstable environment, which it could be argued had led to war. But what this essay will try and determine, is whether or not world war one was the collective responsibility of all the European powers, or whether the war was solely the accountability of Germanys attitudes to other European powers in the years leading up to the war. Germany was built, one may argue, from war and hostility between France and Prussia. Before it was formed as a country with united states, it was once a large state (Prussia), which had smaller disunited states littered around Prussia. Later, due to the direct influence of Otto Von Bismarck (German chancellor forced to resign by Kaiser Wilhelm in the year 1890), Prussia then joined with the smaller states to form one nation; Germany. ...read more.


However, some may argue that Germany was very threatening and was so abrasive in its foreign policies because they wanted to become all-powerful (even more so than any other of the powers). Another argument could be that Germany constantly wanted to go to war. A good example (some may argue) that Germany wanted to go to war was the vast amount of money that was going on building German armies and navies. Germany was gearing all of its strength on the investment and building of arms, in a desperate attempt to win the arms race. However, Britain was winning, because although Germany had the best raw materials to produce good quality arms. Germany did not have a good as manufacturing process as the British. The building up of arms, armies and navies are clearly evident in sources one and six, which both show that Germany was putting capital into building up arms. Source six is a table of army and Naval money investment (as an estimate), which were possibly published in a school textbook). Source six shows how German money spent on the army and navy had doubled in the years 1910-1914. Germanys investment on army and navy had possibly intensified because of the Von schleiffen plan, which intensified relations between, Germany, France and Russia. Germany thought that without a strong army and strong navy; Germany would be a weak power. ...read more.


After analysing all of the relevant sources for the study of the origins of the First World War, the conclusion drawn, would be that Germany was certainly warlike and aggressive in its foreign policies. However, the feeling is that Germany was not the only European nation who was warlike and aggressive. After reading the available sources, it would appear that the First World War was not solely the responsibility of Germany, but a collective responsibility of all the European powers. Each nation was as wary of the other. If one nation made a slight advance, then the other nation would feel threatened or suspicious. The main issue is that, Germany was only warlike and aggressive because they felt vulnerable as a newly formed successful nation, and that they were as paranoid as the other powers were. The paranoia and vulnerability is noticeably evident in the studied sources (one and three). The suspicion and threat felt by the other powers (mainly Britain) at Germanys power are plainly apparent in the sources considered (two and three). The powers were only suspicious of Germany because Germany had immense supremacy to other throw other nations, and they were to some extent frightening as a fighting force. Germany was only warlike and aggressive as a means of self-defence and retaliation, not as a means to beat and gain a larger empire. But as the other nations grew more suspicious, an even more unstable nature was created which lead to war. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    * London and other cities began to be bombed by Zeppelins in 1915. Despite their size and the fact that they were filled with highly inflammable hydrogen. * In late 1916 Gotha bombers began to raid Britain. Altogether during the war there were 103 air raids, killing about 1400 people.

  2. To What extent was German Foreign Policy responsible for the outbreak of general European ...

    A war would not only divert the attention of the people and perhaps save the monarchy but also a victory would re-establish Russia to its previous status as a great power. In the Russian was cabinet there were those who wanted war, including the war minister Sukhomlinov.

  1. “Generals Win Battles, Resources Win Wars”. How Far Does Your Study of the Period ...

    Good leadership does however allow for those two crucial elements to come together to form a potentially war winning combination, as was struck in the commander that was Wellington, and was so clearly lacking in the Napoleon's Russian offensive. It is clear that whilst resources were of vital importance for

  2. How far was Germany responsible for the outbreak of war in 1914?

    This formed the basis of the German assault in 1914. There were four major points to the plan; the war would have to be fought against France and Russia, possibly Britain as well, the decisive victory would be against France and Germany should remain on the defensive against Russia until

  1. Consider How Far Gladstone And Disraeli Differed In Their Policies Regarding The British Empire ...

    Gladstone and Disraeli had differing opinions over Russia. Disraeli regarded her as more of a threat than Gladstone did, perhaps due to the fact that disliking Russia was a traditional British view, which were the views that Disraeli tended to follow.

  2. Vietnam Coursework Sources Questions

    Source A shows this kind of fear from communism. As it is written by J.F.K before becoming president, it shows that it was a common worry among the government. Source G shows how the public also felt Vietnam was a big worry as well so Vietnam was seen as a very important issue by most Americans.

  1. Hiroshima Coursework This piece of coursework will concentrate on three questions, all source based.

    He also tries to justify the agreement of the bomb by stating he had agreed it with 10 men (military) so that he wouldn't get all the blame for the destruction it caused.

  2. American economic foreign policy and the origins of the cold war

    As prices fell and unemployment spread, the major industrial countries hastened to protect their native industries by raising barriers to foreign goods and devaluating their currencies. From 1929 to 1932, world prices plummeted forty-seven percent, the value of world trade by sixty percent, and employment in industrial countries by twenty-five

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work