• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree that Hitler became Chancellor primarily due to political intrigue?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far do you agree that Hitler became Chancellor primarily due to political intrigue? The Nazi party was the largest political party in the Reichstag after the July 1932 elections; their influence and foothold in Germany could not go unnoticed. Hitler was an excellent public speaker who was able to influence those he wanted to, and Nazi party member Goebbels was running a massive propaganda campaign to increase Hitler's popularity further. But, August-December 1932 was a difficult period for the Hitler's Nazi party - more radical members were becoming restless as although their party was popular throughout Germany and Hitler looked certain to be the next Chancellor, they did not have the majority vote yet and legally there was no clear path into the German government, especially as the current president did not trust him. At the time, Germany was led by President Hindenburg. The President was elderly and relied on his aides and colleagues, Chancellor Von Papen and General Schleicher, to guide him in difficult political decisions. ...read more.

Middle

Hindenburg eventually conceded that Schleicher had failed and on the advice of Von Papen, Hitler should be appointed chancellor in a Nazi-conservative coalition government. From this we can see that Von Papen's actions in trying to get back at Schleicher for his apparent treachery led to Hitler becoming chancellor & thus political intrigue got him into power. However, it could be argued that Hitler could have gotten into power anyway. Regardless of the fact that the Nazi party had dropped votes in the November 1932 elections, the Nazi party was the biggest party in the Reichstag with 230 seats and was very much the dominant political force in Germany. Goebbels' propaganda was a powerful tool in establishing Hitler as the only man who could take Germany forward. Many people were still bitter about the outcome of World War One (including Hitler himself) and his image as a strong, independent leader appealed to all classes and social standings. ...read more.

Conclusion

It can be said that another reason for Schleicher's actions, bar just being nervous about Von Papen's capability as Chancellor, was so that he himself could seize power and align himself as a hero who brought about national reconciliation. Schleicher ultimately failed and this was favourably received by Von Papen, who convinced President Hindenburg to tell him to step down. Perhaps if Schleicher was successful in stabilising the country Hindenburg would not have listened to Von Papen but in reality the tables were turned and Von Papen had Schleicher removed from power. Hitler was brought into power by the apparently jealous & bitter Von Papen. Had Schleicher been successfully able to appoint Strasser as Vice Chancellor, perhaps the rift in the Nazi party may have gotten so large that the party folded. Hitler became Chancellor due to the mass support the Nazi party had and also due to the failings of Von Papen and Schleicher, but primarily it was because the political backhandedness and power-hungry deviousness of Von Papen. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

The strength of this essay is in its structure which clearly examines a range of factors and uses excellent detail from the period to support and exemplify the points.

It could have been tightened up by actually labelling the main factors at the start and by developing the argument to focus on the links and relationships between the factors to build on the ideas that they all played some part in Hitler's rise to power. ***

Marked by teacher Kate Forbes 01/03/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The Weakness of the Directory was the main reasons for Napoleons rise to Power. ...

    5 star(s)

    Napoleon's brother Lucien was president of the Council of Five Hundred, and when Napoleon told the Council about the decree of outlawry there was uproar and Napoleon got escorted outside. However his brother took up his sword and vowed Napoleon would kill his brother if he did not keep his

  2. The main threat to the stability of the Weimar Republic in the period 1919 ...

    a day, which was barely enough to cover the cost of a loaf of bread. The high cost of the war effort had meant that the government deficit had skyrocketed in four years and the German government rather than raising taxes to help pay off these debts chose to sell

  1. How far and why did the aims of the revolutionaries in France change during ...

    The defection of the Girondin army commanders to the Austrians (Dumoriez) led to the destruction of the Girondin party and the growth of the Jacobins. The war also led to many economic issues within the nation. To pay for the war more and more assignats were printed, leading to inflation, and bread was scarce.

  2. To what extent can Hitler be considered to be "weak"?

    Burleigh (2000), shows a insight that gives an idea that Hitler did not have to take hold of all his responsibilities as the Furher. "We should not expect a leader who saw himself as an artist-politician genius to behave like a hard working academic committee man"3.

  1. How far were the ideas of the philosophes responsible for the outbreak of the ...

    The third estate was at the very bottom and consisted of everybody else and there were great extremes of wealth. They did not have rights and privileges and had to carry the burden of the two privileged classes.

  2. What were the obstacles to German Unification immediatly before the 1848 Revolutions

    To combat this Metternich publicly condoned constitutional reform of any sort. This meant that the Confederacy could not enact these constitutional chances because its president, Austria was against them. Without a single German government Unification was not viable and by stopping this Metternich was again putting another obstacle in the way of Unification at this time.

  1. Why did the Provisional Government Fail?

    Kerensky underestimated the Bolshevik's and Lenin. Once he had fought off their uprising with Lenin's plan of 'Peace for the Army, Bread for the Workers and Land for the Peasants', he thought sending Lenin to exile was sufficient. After Lenin accepted that he had lost his chance to become President, an uprising in Petrograd (Kornilov Affair

  2. How successful was the National Assembly bringing equality and liberty to France during 1789-93?

    of Man and the Citizen issued on the 26th August 1789 and its policies were based on the Enlightenment thinkers who believed that France should be sovereign. It brought the basis of equality into France and consisted of rights that were demanded by the cahiers from the meeting of the Estates-General.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work