• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree that propaganda and compromise were more important than force and intimidation in Mussolini's consolidation of power 1924-9?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far do you agree that propaganda and compromise were more important than force and intimidation in Mussolini's consolidation of power 1924-29? In the consolidation of his power Mussolini used both propaganda and compromise, and force and intimidation. The fascists had used propaganda from the beginning of their rise to power, maybe not as effectively as the Bolsheviks in Russia, but it had been key to their seizure of control. However I feel that Mussolini placed more importance on fear and intimidation as tools in the period when he was consolidating his power. One of the most significant examples of Mussolini's effective use of force and intimidation upon Italy is that of the Matteoti Crisis of 1924. After a 30 minute speech in the chamber of deputies denouncing the fascist party for their violence during the elections he left knowing he had signed his own death warrant. The murder of Matteoti - discovered 2 months later - was traced back to be the work of Mussolini's secret hit squad 'the Cheka'. Ironically, Mussolini's use of force against Matteoti eventually worked in his favour rather than against it. The mistakes of the socialists also played a key role in Mussolini's triumphant materialization from the Matteoti Crisis. ...read more.

Middle

The King was the sole person who had the power to put an end to Mussolini's March on Rome by sending in the army to take a stand, however the King overestimated the strength of the Fascist forces and feared his intervention may cause a civil war within Italy. The current Prime Minister - Facta was denied his request for martial law by the King, and as a result, resigned from his position and the King was given no alternative but to offer the place to Mussolini. These events, which took place at the March on Rome, were instrumental to Mussolini's rise to power. In order to appear a strong and determined leader, Mussolini relayed his success as the result of pure power in numbers and intimidation. However it appears to be the product of a weak King who made miscalculations regarding the strength of the Fascist movement, "The March on Rome...was a show of strength...this show of strength would have failed if the King had opposed it"2 supporting my point that it was the King's underestimation of the Fascist's strength which created an unwillingness to take action against them. Fear and force has been shown already to have had a huge input into the consolidation of Mussolini's power, however, the question remains as to whether he could have succeeded with those 'tools' alone. ...read more.

Conclusion

One of the most successful forms of propaganda produced by the Fascist party was the Dopolavoro, which was set up in 1925. It was an organisation set up to provide state-sponsored after work entertainment, touring around the country to reach all the Italian people and promote the idea of Fascism. This illustrates aspects of the Fascist regime who's aim was total control over all aspects of the Italian's lives as it aimed to reach people in all parts of the country in order to manipulate their political agendas. The Dopolavoro proved to be very popular with the Italian people and took the fascist ideals to areas where support would have been weak and other ideals still survived underground - this was successful propaganda and contributed largely to the consolidation of power. Mussolini's initial rise to power was brought about by using strong fear and force tactics to bully the Italian people into accepting his almost autocratic role as leader, in a country that had already had an established democracy for a number of years this was quite an extraordinary feat. However the constant use of propaganda, and in places, compromise to portray the deity-like figure of 'Il Duce' must have been equally important in the consolidation and holding of power by the Fascist party and Mussolini. 1 Mussolini's First Speech as Prime Minister, 1922 2 G. Carocci Tristan Lochman History Summer Homework ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Why did Mussolini come to Power in 1922? How did Mussolini consolidate his position ...

    4 star(s)

    With Mussolini's dictatorial position secure as the 1920s progressed, he also revealed a desire to transform Italian society and even the Italian character. Being the dictator of Italy was not enough for Mussolini; he wanted to be the dictator of a state whose economy was capable of serving a war

  2. How Successfully did Mussolini Consolidate Fascist Power between 1922 and 1925?

    The Elite provided essential support for Mussolini. He had them on his side by providing tax loopholes and land reform but they also supported him for other reasons. The ever increasing (though really non-existent)

  1. Propaganda was the key factor in the consolidation of the Fascist regime in Italy ...

    This indoctrinated the illiterate with Fascist ideas and the 'Il Duce' image. Mass rallies and parades were also used to heighten national pride. However, Mussolini's ruthless determination and tactics helped him to consolidate his power and the Fascist regime. He continued to use the threat of violence to intimidate parliament.

  2. Hitler's use of propaganda.

    In contrast, the British and Americans had been right to portray the Germans as Huns6 and barbarians because their soldiers would then be prepared for the horrors of battle7. Hitler was also impressed by the way that Allied propaganda conceived entirely for the masses and tirelessly repeated.

  1. What methods were used by the Bolsheviks to maintain their power to 1924? How ...

    This can be seen as success as well as failure as they will gain support from peasants (the majority of their population), which will help secure there position but also lose trust and support from their own party members who disagreed with the decision which would create a degree of

  2. The Bolshevik Consolidation of power 1917-21.

    * The renaming of Russia from RSFSR (Russian Socialist Federal Soviet Republic) to USSR (Union of Soviet Socialist Republics) represented an extension of the central authority of Moscow. The Terror * Lenin had always accepted terror as an instrument of political control and as he regarded Marxism-Leninism as being superior to all other ideologies repression became necessary.

  1. Nazi consolidation of power in 1933 was primarily due to their use of violence ...

    Boasting this financial support and the use of Goebbels and the media, the Nazis were confident that they would secure a parliamentary majority. Despite this, although the Nazis increased their vote from 33.1 per cent to 43.9 per cent, this result was a political blow as in order to make

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Children denied education. 3. 1928 ? many given hard labour. 4. Had their property confiscated. This showed how far the Party were willing to go in order to achieve their main goal: socialism. Kulaks did not like this as they were benefiting greatly from the half-Capitalist, half-Socialist policy that was the NEP.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work