• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree with the view that Lenins leadership was the main reason for Bolshevik success in October 1917?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Bolsheviks were an extremist party who ultimately took over the rule of Russia in 1917. They were led by Lenin, who was an excellent leader in many ways, and it was widely acknowledged that he was the ultimate reason for the Bolshevik success in 1917. However, this opinion has been revised more recently, as other factors, including the temporary nature of Provisional Government, the desperation of the people due to the First World War and the influence of other major Bolshevik leaders, among others. Lenin was an excellent leader who was attractive to the mass of the people in Russia, which gained the party support and led to the Bolshevik success in October 1917. He was incredibly intelligent and was an excellent orator, meaning that he was able to communicate his complex ideas to the people very simply, in terms that were relevant to them and that they could understand. He also dressed shabbily, despite the fact that he was from a very well-off family. ...read more.

Middle

Lenin also exploited the weaknesses of the Provisional Government. This meant that his party looked stronger than the current political leadership and that he gained support from the already angry citizens of Russia. Lenin was the ultimate strategist of the October Revolution, making his party look stronger and more organised than the other parties, meaning that they were more likely to gain support because of how strong their party looked. However, when it came to the actual revolution, Lenin had little idea of what was going on, and his confusion was almost detrimental to the success of Bolsheviks in October 1917. This suggested that there was a lack of organization and communication with the party, and presented potential supporters with a contradiction, which may cause them not to support the party. There are a number of other reasons to suggest that Lenin was not, in fact, the main reason for the Bolshevik success in October 1917. He was in exile for the majority of 1917, meaning that other party leaders, particularly Trotsky, had a major influence over the party politics. ...read more.

Conclusion

There are several other reasons for the success of the Bolshevik party which individually appear to have little to do with Lenin. The Kornilov Revolt made the party look like national patriots, and gained them much support in time for the October revolution. The temporary nature of the Provisional Government was also a contributing factor , who were essentially just ?looking after? the country until a constitutional assembly could be established meant that it was weak. This meant that the ruthless Bolsheviks could easily overthrow this government. It was also the first instance of democratic rule in Russia, which increased the chances of power going to the most flexible and ruthless party; the Bolsheviks. In Conclusion, I feel that Lenin is the ultimate reason for the Bolshevik success in October 1917, despite the fact that there were a large number of contributing factors which he was not responsible for. He was able to make the party seem accessible to the majority of Russians, and took advantage of every possible factor which presented itself to the Bolshevik party, making them look as strong and reliable as physically possible. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    * All Napoleon's campaigns were conducted using the weapons of the Ancien Regime. * The musket was still the standard infantry weapon - a smooth-bored, muzzle-loading flintlock firing lead bullets, and fitted with a bayonet. Its firepower was limited, its rate of fire slow and its accuracy poor except at close range.

  2. How important was Lenin to the success of the October 1917 Revolution?

    However, the way that he was significant differed greatly between these two times. In order to determine whether the figure of Lenin was more significant in 1917 or the years that immediately followed, we must consider that they were two very different times and so the role of Lenin changes between them.

  1. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    A further 100,000 men were garrisoned in and around Moscow, and 32,000 soldiers and sailors were stationed at Kronstadt. For the most part the men of the garrisons were either over or under age, or else recovering from wounds. They were mostly peasant in background and thus many of them

  2. How far was the First World War responsible for the downfall of the Romanovs ...

    Rasputin undermined the authority and reputation of the Tsar and was resented by the Russian people as he was viewed as a corrupt, drunken womanizer. First he gained a reputation as the magical healer among the peasants and when the Tsarina heard this she called upon him to heal her

  1. The Significance of Lenin in the Bolshevik Revolution (1917-1923)

    them to take violent action against the Provisional Government or the Soviet as he felt they were not ready. The confused rioters eventually died down. The July days were quite a blow for the Bolsheviks, it appeared as if they had been caught off balance and missed their chance of seizing power.

  2. How far do you agree that WW1 was mainly responsible for the February Revolution ...

    This unimaginable death toll caused a great loss in agricultural workers, this lead to major food and fuel shortages in towns and cities. The Great War arrived with a huge economic cost for Russia. Higher taxes were introduced for peasantry and borrowing increased from Britain and France to fund the War.

  1. Assess Lenins strengths and weaknesses as leader of Russia from 1917 to 1924.

    Lenin was pragmatic; a utopian thinker, but one who was able to adjust his policies in the interests of political survival.

  2. Assess the view that the Bolshevik rule from 1917 to 1924 was shaped more ...

    state which cared for the interests of all working class people whatever their nationality?. Maybe this was arrogance on Lenin?s part expecting different people to just conform to a state which most of the nationalities did not elect and some did not want the Bolsheviks in power.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work