• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree with the view that Lenins leadership was the main reason for Bolshevik success in October 1917?

Extracts from this document...


The Bolsheviks were an extremist party who ultimately took over the rule of Russia in 1917. They were led by Lenin, who was an excellent leader in many ways, and it was widely acknowledged that he was the ultimate reason for the Bolshevik success in 1917. However, this opinion has been revised more recently, as other factors, including the temporary nature of Provisional Government, the desperation of the people due to the First World War and the influence of other major Bolshevik leaders, among others. Lenin was an excellent leader who was attractive to the mass of the people in Russia, which gained the party support and led to the Bolshevik success in October 1917. He was incredibly intelligent and was an excellent orator, meaning that he was able to communicate his complex ideas to the people very simply, in terms that were relevant to them and that they could understand. He also dressed shabbily, despite the fact that he was from a very well-off family. ...read more.


Lenin also exploited the weaknesses of the Provisional Government. This meant that his party looked stronger than the current political leadership and that he gained support from the already angry citizens of Russia. Lenin was the ultimate strategist of the October Revolution, making his party look stronger and more organised than the other parties, meaning that they were more likely to gain support because of how strong their party looked. However, when it came to the actual revolution, Lenin had little idea of what was going on, and his confusion was almost detrimental to the success of Bolsheviks in October 1917. This suggested that there was a lack of organization and communication with the party, and presented potential supporters with a contradiction, which may cause them not to support the party. There are a number of other reasons to suggest that Lenin was not, in fact, the main reason for the Bolshevik success in October 1917. He was in exile for the majority of 1917, meaning that other party leaders, particularly Trotsky, had a major influence over the party politics. ...read more.


There are several other reasons for the success of the Bolshevik party which individually appear to have little to do with Lenin. The Kornilov Revolt made the party look like national patriots, and gained them much support in time for the October revolution. The temporary nature of the Provisional Government was also a contributing factor , who were essentially just ?looking after? the country until a constitutional assembly could be established meant that it was weak. This meant that the ruthless Bolsheviks could easily overthrow this government. It was also the first instance of democratic rule in Russia, which increased the chances of power going to the most flexible and ruthless party; the Bolsheviks. In Conclusion, I feel that Lenin is the ultimate reason for the Bolshevik success in October 1917, despite the fact that there were a large number of contributing factors which he was not responsible for. He was able to make the party seem accessible to the majority of Russians, and took advantage of every possible factor which presented itself to the Bolshevik party, making them look as strong and reliable as physically possible. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    In 1805, for instance, half the total strength of the army had fought under Napoleon at Marengo (1800), and a quarter had served in the Revolutionary wars; most of the officers and non-commissioned officers were experienced campaigners, although a high proportion of the rank and file were raw conscripts.

  2. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    were familiar with and supportive of the ideological programme of the Socialist Revolutionaries. Their real loyalty, however, as Robert Daniels has observed, was to whomever would keep them from being shipped to the front. There was every reason for the soldiers to resist.

  1. Russia 1905-1941 'Explain how the unpopularity of the Provisional Government contributed to the Bolshevik ...

    However, he was still able to express his views towards the war which were very satisfying to the workers and proletariat of Russia. In his five letters entitled 'Letters from Afar' he ridiculed the Provisional government and urged the Bolsheviks not to obey regulations.

  2. How is the Bolshevik Revolution best explained: Lenin's success or Kerensky's failure?

    This then meant that the Provisional Government was vulnerable and could be overthrown just like the Tsar had been - because the Tsar lost control of the army he could not control the country and therefore was forced to abdicate.

  1. Assess Lenins strengths and weaknesses as leader of Russia from 1917 to 1924.

    As leader of Russia, Lenin?s pragmatism enabled him to sacrifice his long term aims in order to achieve success in the short term, ad secure Bolshevik rule, therefore it can be seen as a strength. Lenin?s incredible self-belief was at the core of his political personality, one could argue that

  2. How far do you agree that WW1 was mainly responsible for the February Revolution ...

    This unimaginable death toll caused a great loss in agricultural workers, this lead to major food and fuel shortages in towns and cities. The Great War arrived with a huge economic cost for Russia. Higher taxes were introduced for peasantry and borrowing increased from Britain and France to fund the War.

  1. The Bolsheviks were able to seize power in October 1917 mainly because of the ...

    The government were edging towards the imposition of martial law after the continued strikes and unrest in Petrograd. Kornilov moved to supress unrest in Petrograd but at the last moment Kerensky ordered his arrest and had to call Soviet to help defend the city against what seemed like an attempted coup by Kornilov.

  2. Assess Lenin's strengths and weaknesses as leader of Russia from 1917 to 1924.

    The following day, Lenin then introduced the April theses, Lenin made promises to the people on what was to be done, and what the provisional government were not doing. This gained the Bolsheviks mass support from the soldiers, workers and peasantry.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work