• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How War Affected Russia

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Russian History Coursework: Trotsky described war as the 'locomotive of history'. Can it be argued that change in Russia in the period 1855 - 1954 was caused primarily by involvement in wars? It could be argued that Trotsky's statement gives us a plausible explanation as to why there was a great amount of change that took place between 1855-1954 in Russia. Each war that Russia became involved in exposed her weaknesses and highlighted what needed to be changed On the other hand, it could also be argued that the wars in this period were not the major reasons as to why Russia witnessed so many changes - other factors, for instance the role of the Tsars and other leaders such as Lenin and Stalin, should be considered when analysing where the need for change stemmed from. Firstly, the emancipation of the serfs in 1861 was finally passed as the Russian government saw that its state was the only left in Europe with a feudal system; however, it was Russia's terrible defeat in the Crimean War that left the government significantly aware of their backwardness as well as the inhumane treatment of the peasants. During the Crimean War, fifty million out of the sixty million legal occupants in Russia were serfs: so it was not surprising that the army consisted almost entirely of serfs forced to serve in it, exacerbating the frailty of Russia's military. ...read more.

Middle

Although land-owners had granted the peasants half the cultivated land, the 49-year redemption payments that had to be paid to the land-owners were to make serfs' financial situations worse, and they were still tied to the newly-introduced "Mirs" . 148 peasant uprisings had occured between 1826-34, so in this case a combination of the war and reforms three decades later lucidly increased tensions between peasants and the nobles. Despite the fact that Alexander II did not want to fight Turkey, the the Russo-Turkish War of 1877 primarily culminated a year later in an initial gain for Russia to increase supremacy as a Great Power and improved its position in the Balkans. Because the Russians forced the Turks to sue for peace, Russia benefited greatly when the Treaty of San Stefano was signed: Russia obtained the right to occupy Bulgaria for two years; and Turkey was forced to surrender to nearby Russian areas such as Ardahan and Batum. However, the change made by the war that seemed favourable to Russia was short-lived. It was clear to Britain and Austria that Russia had gained too much from this treaty and it needed to be revised -- thus, the Congress of Berlin was enforced. ...read more.

Conclusion

Others were becoming increasingly aware of the fact that the autocratic rule was not the only way to govern as gradually more diverse classes were coming together. The 1905 Revolution is often referred to as 'the year of change' [N. Kelly; 'Russia and the USSR'] because an important factor to consider is that it was the first time that three separate classes had united to oppose the Tsar and government - the industrial workers, the middle-class and the peasantry. What is also significant about the Revolution is that pre-1905 strikes and demonstations had taken place primarily for economic protests -- 1905 saw hundreds of thousands of civillians protesting for political rights. The well-known event that commenced the 1905 Revolution was Bloody Sunday. The march in St. Petersburg resulted in police forces firing on the protestors, killing 200 and injuring 100s more. Although Nicholas II was not present at the bloody scene, the event caused an even greater change to Russia in that year that had led on from the war. Father Georgy Gapon who led the march cried: "There is no God any longer. There is no Tsar'. The Russo-Japanese War seemed to have escalated hatred throughout Russia, and in a short space of time a long-term change had taken place. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    * The other leaders underestimated Stalin and exaggerated the danger presented by Trotsky. Stalin did not look threatening; he was an administrator who did the boring work. He was not a good speaker. * Trotsky's failure to turn up at Lenin's funeral weakened his position from the beginning.

  2. Russia and its Locomotive of History

    Oxely; 'Russia, 1855-1991]. Although these reforms seemed appealing on the surface, they also presented the government with a greater threat of a revolution, as those against the autocracy were given more opportunities to have their own say. In addition to this, the military reform to extend conscription to all classes - as well

  1. During his lifetime, Lenin made many important decisions and policies which affected every citizen ...

    The shortages of factory goods had lead to the prices of goods to rise continually and the middle class found it to be very expensive to buy essential items for themselves and the end to the war meant that the situation will eventually stabalise and the prices would return back to normal.

  2. Blitzkreig coursework

    Such an intervention may have prolonged or even prevented the German occupation, this suggests that Britain and France�s view that they were fighting a "phony war" was an important factor in the German quick victory won in Poland. Another Allied mistake that was of large consequence in the German victory

  1. Trotsky described war as the 'locomotive of history'. Can it be argued that change ...

    In contrast to this, Lenin managed to defend his revolution in the Civil War and change Russia how he saw fit. Involvement in wars was also key to domestic policy throughout the period. The First World War led to massive change caused by a shift in ideology towards Marxist theory

  2. Vietnam war

    * Policy of pacification to 'win the hearts and minds' of the people of South Vietnam. * Military policy of attrition, as endorsed by General Westmoreland. De-escalation 1968-1973: Nixon doctrine; Vietnamisation * On the 19th of March, 130 members of the House of Reps passed a resolution calling for an immediate review by Congress of US war policy.

  1. What were the mains reasons for the emancipation of Serfs in Russia?

    This writing reflects the emergence of these men from the early 19th century, which is opposed to serfdom for ideological reasons. Koshelyov while using arguments of economic self-interest also claimed that the landowners themselves were ceasing that they had a moral right to own other human beings like chattels.

  2. How far do you agree that the Russo Japanese war was the biggest cause ...

    whole nation, the principle of autocracy.? This once again enraged the majority of the population, they had seen the problems autocracy had caused and were hoping that Nicholas would notice this as well.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work