• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'It was rapid advances in technology which allowed Britain to turn the tide of the Battle of the Atlantic against Germany by mid-1943'. How far do you agree with this judgment?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'It was rapid advances in technology which allowed Britain to turn the tide of the Battle of the Atlantic against Germany by mid-1943'. How far do you agree with this judgment? The rapid advances in technology certainly played a large part in the turning of the tide against Germany, 4 major advances were made in 1942/1943; the Leigh Light, HF/DF, long range aircraft and hedgehog bombs which all contributed greatly to the effective detection and destruction of U-boats. Of course technology wasn't the only contributing factor to the turning of the tide; the appointment of Max Horton, the involvement of the USA from 1941 and axis complacency all contributed to the success of the allies in the Battle of the Atlantic. The effective advances in technology were made in late 1942; the Leigh Light which was attached to planes meant that the u-boats on the surface at night could be identified and attacked from the air; the u-boats had little warning so they couldn't submerge themselves quick enough to escape any bombs being dropped. ...read more.

Middle

As well as the positive advances in technology, there were also limitations to it. ASDIC in theory should have been highly effective but the allies didn't realize that although the submerged u-boats could be detected, they could still attack, undetected at night on the surface, where ASDIC couldn't spot them. However, the Leigh Light of course put a stop to this in 1942 when surfaced u-boats could be detected. In addition to the technology there were also other contributors to the turning of the tide, arguably without these the turning of the tide may not have happened. The appointment of Max Horton as commander in 1942 was a big help to the campaign in the Atlantic, not only did Horton integrate the Navy and RAF he also introduced more long range aircraft and trained pilots more effectively. He also changed the strategy in the sea, before he was appointed the allies were largely avoiding the u-boats where they could; Horton's strategy was to lure the enemy into action and attacked from there. ...read more.

Conclusion

The USA's involvement in the war from 1941 also helped in the Atlantic, they were an economic superpower, capable of producing large numbers of liberty ships in a few days; over 2000 were built in 1945 alone. These liberty ships also aided the convoys of merchant ships which made Germany's objective of stopping all supply to Britain increasingly difficult to complete. Although there are many other contributing factors to the turning of the tide in the Atlantic, it is clear that new technology was the most effective. Without the technology, allied losses would still have been high from night attacks; Horton's strategy would have been futile against such offensives. The new weapons brought a refreshing change to the allied attacks which the enemy wasn't expecting and could do nothing about. The complacency of the axis may have gone undiscovered if HF/DF hadn't been invented as the allies would have probably taken longer to identify the repetitive formation of the u-boats. Without technology, the other contributing factors wouldn't have been as effective, therefore making it a vital catalyst in the turning of the tide against Germany. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Why was the Battle of Stalingrad a turning point in the war against ...

    The battle of Stalingrad showed to the world that the mighty German war machine was vulnerable. Stalingrad was the first really massive German defeat on land, and it showed that the Russians could beat the Germans, leading other counties to believe that perhaps they too could defeat the Germans.

  2. The Battle of the Denmark Strait and the Failure of Operation Rheinbung

    or a flash higher than the mainmast, either way indicative of a large and extremely potent explosion. Leach himself, perhaps one of the most qualified to say, saw a n explosion "twice the height of the mainmast." Many of the officers also say the explosion was near the centre of

  1. The battle of Britain was an important turning point in the second world war ...

    Without it I don't think that Hitler would have been so powerful. Norway was quickly over run by Germany with help from a Norwegian traitor who obviously offered to help Hitler. The morale in Germany would most probably have been quite high as they had defeated and over run every

  2. How had Hitler been successful in his war campaign up until the Battle of ...

    Although Jews were particularly singled out, the non-Jewish Polish peasantry was treated little better. Though these atrocities would pale in comparison with what was to come, the initial weeks of Hitler's invasion were a gruesome demonstration of the German war machine's capabilities and intentions.

  1. The Battle Of Britain

    Liverpool, Glasgow, Birmingham, Manchester, Dover, Canterbury, Plymouth and Southampton were all heavily bombed. The Blitz happened mostly in 1940-41 but some air raids occurred after this. In 1940, when Great Britain faced its worst danger of the war and German invasion was a possibility, the Home Guard was formed.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    and with a knowledge of the fact which dazzled the generals or ministers summoned to receive his orders. To sustain this part he drew on his remarkable memory, which enabled him to reel off complicated orders of battle, technical specifications and long lists of names and dates without a moment's hesitation.

  1. The Battle of Britain

    Defending yourself against the S.A. was regarded as a major offence. At the beginning of 1934, the power of the German military was already increasing. Already the strength of Hitler's Military Army was 100,000, but he issued the order that this was to be trebled to 300,000.

  2. Why did Napoleon lose the Battle of Waterloo?

    reach the scene and before the English and Prussian armies could unite. He had 126 000 in his Armee du Nord going up against 213 000 men led by Blucher and Wellington. On June 15, the French army moved across the Belgium border.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work