• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Paulus who was commander of the 6th Army, to the Germany army high command, wrote source A - It is a plea to 'surrender in order to save lives' at the battle of Stalingrad.

Extracts from this document...


Andrew Wilds History Coursework Q1 Paulus who was commander of the 6th Army, to the Germany army high command, wrote source A. It is a plea to 'surrender in order to save lives' at the battle of Stalingrad. Source A does mention several good points as to why the Germans surrendered at Stalingrad. The troops were indeed 'without ammunition or food'. The front lines were crumbling without effective command possible. 18000 wounded 'without supplies of dressing or drugs'. The fall of the 6th army in Stalingrad was 'inevitable. These are all reasons as too why the Germans surrendered at Stalingrad. It does however need to take other reasons into account as to why the Germans surrendered. One reason for the German surrender that was not brought up in Source A was the Russian winter. The Russians were very much prepared for a winter like this with winter clothing. The Germans, who were not prepared or used to this weather had leather boots that stuck to the ground. The equipment was not adaptable to this kind of weather; they had to burn fires under their tanks and trucks in order to stop the freezing up. ...read more.


Source E is German propaganda. It was said in a way to keep the peoples faith in Hitler strong after the defeat in Stalingrad. It does not mention any points of the battle such as frostbite, starvation and lack of supplies. It misses out all of these details as the people would react badly to this and could lose their faith in Hitler. They say that the defeat has only made them stronger, and that the many thousands of people killed was not 'in vain'. It mentions that 'they died that Germany might live', when in actual fat, from looking at source C many of the soldiers had lost their faith in Germany. They could not mention this though. Germany had to keep the soldiers in good morale and to do this they had to be discreet about what really happened in Stalingrad. The source mentions that the battle of Stalingrad gave time to set up defences that decided 'the fate of the whole eastern front'. By mentioning this they were trying to make the people believe that the battle was not at a loss. ...read more.


He had given them all they had asked for and all he had promised to them. They realised though that he had only been taking lucky risks and that his luck had stopped at Stalingrad. " To many he was revealed not as a brilliant military strategist but as a mad corporal". They realised that many Germans lives could have been saved if Hitler had just given in. " If what was promised is not true then Germany will be lost". The defeat at Stalingrad helped the German people to realise this. The Germans victory of World War 2 was becoming less likely. Some say that the defeat was a positive advantage for the Germans as it helped them "fall back and regroup the strike back". It was the Germans 'who took the offensive when fighting season of 1943 opened'. Stalingrad had not been the loss to Germany as many thought it had been, the Germans had 'recovered their fighting spirit' and were very much still 'masters of the field'. The Russians were very grateful for the victory at Stalingrad. It helped the Germans see Hitler in a different light. For these reasons the German defeat at Stalingrad was equally important for both the Russians and the Germans. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Why was the Battle of Stalingrad a turning point in the war against ...

    All land was burnt, just to make sure that the Germans couldn't gain access to any of the Russians property or land containing raw materials. This was not forseen by Hitler and so his plans to seize the crops for food and shelter could not go ahead.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    The foreign reaction to the Nazi-Soviet Pact and the annihilation of Poland was one of shock and rage. The Communist parties abroad, which had no official warning of the Soviet switch, reacted with confusion. On September 6 Thorez and other French Communists joined their regiments, calling for aid to Poland, only to desert at Moscow's behest a few days later.

  1. The Importance of the Battle of Stalingrad.

    Army Group 'A' didn't suffered as much, and it was only when field marshal Von Manstein, commanding the improvised Army Group 'Don', managed to stabilise the front and prevent collapse and destroyed the Soviet offensive at the III Battle of Kh�rkov in early 1943.

  2. The Battle Of Britain

    It grew in time to more than a million part-time soldiers, who received basic training and some arms to defend their local areas against the Germans in the event of an invasion. Land girls were a way for women to help the War effort.

  1. In February 1943, the German army surrendered at Stalingrad - Was Hitler's interference the ...

    Eventually on the 22nd June Hitler invaded the Soviet Union, with his armies. The Soviet forces were unprepared for this surprise attack, as with this attack the Germans broke the Nazi Soviet pact. From this primary attack the Russians were forced to retreat and give up large parts of land.

  2. Lenin's Russia, source based work.

    These pictures were used as propaganda pictures by Stalin after the death of Lenin to inform the people that Trotsky and Kamenev were not anymore involved with Stalin. It is as if they have disappeared. Trotsky was the man behind the red army.

  1. What can we learn from Source A about Anthony Eden's reasons for opposing Colonel ...

    The stereotypical image of the upper class Briton is shown to be panicking as the Egyptian is showing him the sole of his shoe, which is the ultimate insult in Egypt. As the cartoon was drawn before the British and French attacked it is said to be prophetic as what is conveyed in the picture becomes true.

  2. How far do the sources suggest that the British army leaders were not concerned ...

    The letter implies that Lord Raglan is aware of the poor conditions that the soldiers are being put through, but makes excuses that he cannot do anything about the situation; ?it has not been in my power to lighten the burden of their duties?, even though he could do something about it if the concern is great enough.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work