• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Stalin was convinced that the needs of Soviet Russia could only be met by modernisation.

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐This ?economic revolution? was different from the economic policy with Bukharin state was in total control and this confirmed Stalin?s authority over the party and the government. Stalin was convinced that the needs of Soviet Russia could only be met by modernisation. This also meant that Stalin thought that by bringing Russia up to a level of industrial production, he would enable it to catch up and the overtake the advanced economy of Western Europe and the USA. ...read more.


Stalin thought that the only way to raise money was through land and so collectivisation of the Russia agriculture was the first step towards this. Moreover, this also allowed the Soviet Union to use the profits from land to finance a massive industrialisation programme. First of all, there were two types of farms which were collective and state farms. The plan was to group between 50 and 150 holdings in one unit because large farms would be more efficient and develop the effective use of agricultural machinery. ...read more.


Stalin identified a class of Kulaks who were holding back the workers revolution by monopolising the best land and employing cheap peasant labour. By hoarding, they kept food prices high thus making themselves rich at the expense of other people so this group had to be broken because they were preventing modernisation. However, this was a Bolshevik definition of the Kulaks as they were really a hard-working group of peasants who had proved more efficient that others. In no sense they were like the people Stalin described. Nevertheless, because of Russian History, this term ?kulak? was a powerful notion and provided the grounds for the coercion of the peasantry as a whole. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    In 1938 one standard history textbook, apparently written by Stalin himself, had to be used. Culture and the Arts * Everything, even the Arts, was supposed to play its part in Stalin's 'Second Revolution'. * Under Lenin, there was great artistic freedom, and the 1920s are regarded as a high spot in Russian cultural life.

  2. How far did the achievements of Stalin's economic modernisation programme justify the costs?

    In November 1929, Stalin wrote, 'By the spring of 1930 we shall have 60,000 tractors in the field'.9 This vision of such rapid growth was completely unrealistic with this number of tractors not existing and nor even the factories to produce them.

  1. How far were the socio-economic policies of Stalin aimed towards the modernisation of Soviet ...

    This would severly reduce the chance of a threat via revolution, although peasants would not like the plan as they are excluded from making any surpluses. There is alot of convincing evidence which suggests that the cultural revolution was a policy aimed directly at modernising The Soviet Union and after

  2. To what extent was Stalin responsible for the modernisation of Russia?

    So called accidents and deaths strike fear into the hearts of the Russian people, with 100, 000 workers dying in one incident whilst building Belomor Canal. The truth was, the organisation of the modernisation of Russia by Stalin was poor and inefficient and was even seen as a waste, with

  1. Stalin and the Modernisation of the USSR

    The three party members became known as the 'troika', and with the three of them working against Trotsky, they destroyed his rank as commissar of war, pretty much eliminating him from the race for leadership. Then, when Stalin had sufficient strength, he broke with Zinoviev and Kamenev.

  2. Russia and the Soviet Union 1917-1924

    When they did meet military cadets, they gave up, as did the Provisional Government when the Red Guards found them. The Bolsheviks had control of Petrograd. Key points of how the Bolsheviks took over * The general moral of the people was low, causing fights and riots.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work