• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Stalin was convinced that the needs of Soviet Russia could only be met by modernisation.

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐This ?economic revolution? was different from the economic policy with Bukharin state was in total control and this confirmed Stalin?s authority over the party and the government. Stalin was convinced that the needs of Soviet Russia could only be met by modernisation. This also meant that Stalin thought that by bringing Russia up to a level of industrial production, he would enable it to catch up and the overtake the advanced economy of Western Europe and the USA. ...read more.


Stalin thought that the only way to raise money was through land and so collectivisation of the Russia agriculture was the first step towards this. Moreover, this also allowed the Soviet Union to use the profits from land to finance a massive industrialisation programme. First of all, there were two types of farms which were collective and state farms. The plan was to group between 50 and 150 holdings in one unit because large farms would be more efficient and develop the effective use of agricultural machinery. ...read more.


Stalin identified a class of Kulaks who were holding back the workers revolution by monopolising the best land and employing cheap peasant labour. By hoarding, they kept food prices high thus making themselves rich at the expense of other people so this group had to be broken because they were preventing modernisation. However, this was a Bolshevik definition of the Kulaks as they were really a hard-working group of peasants who had proved more efficient that others. In no sense they were like the people Stalin described. Nevertheless, because of Russian History, this term ?kulak? was a powerful notion and provided the grounds for the coercion of the peasantry as a whole. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    * All films were state-made, so fully reflected the views and wishes of the Party, plying a vital role in propaganda as well as entertainment. * The press and the radio were given great emphasis by the party. Most towns and cities had loudspeakers set up in prominent places so people could hear Government pronouncements.

  2. To what extent was Stalin responsible for the modernisation of Russia?

    Additionally, when Alexander II was in power, there was a severe lack of resources because of the industrial backwardness. During the Crimean War, only one gun was produced for two men. The same situation held throughout the whole of the year.

  1. How far did the achievements of Stalin's economic modernisation programme justify the costs?

    The idea of it was to make the agricultural sector more efficient by combining many small peasant farms to large state run collective farms (kolkhoz). This links in with theory of economies of scale and the use of modern machinery to increase production.

  2. How far were the socio-economic policies of Stalin aimed towards the modernisation of Soviet ...

    This is known as using terror tactics, scaring peasants into complying with his demands. By using collectivisation Stalin is cleverly dispersing any remaining forms of capitalisim out of Russia, because many capitalists will not want to comply with these rules, they will move, this is further securing his grasp on leadership.

  1. Stalin and the Modernisation of the USSR

    The three party members became known as the 'troika', and with the three of them working against Trotsky, they destroyed his rank as commissar of war, pretty much eliminating him from the race for leadership. Then, when Stalin had sufficient strength, he broke with Zinoviev and Kamenev.

  2. Russia and the Soviet Union 1917-1924

    When they did meet military cadets, they gave up, as did the Provisional Government when the Red Guards found them. The Bolsheviks had control of Petrograd. Key points of how the Bolsheviks took over * The general moral of the people was low, causing fights and riots.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work