• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The Cold War in Europe brought the big powers into fighting wars outside Europe between 1950 and 1980." Discuss.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"The Cold War in Europe brought the big powers into fighting wars outside Europe between 1950 and 1980." Discuss. ? Cold War in Europe: Hostile diplomatic relations and military buildup between the US and the USSR and their respective allies in the European theatre ? Big Powers: US and USSR, for simplicity - though France and Britain do have certain dealings abroad in the period described that had to do with the Cold War, but these were only marginal and not as significant as US and USSR's actions ? Wars outside Europe: Armed conflicts taking place outside the European theatre, including also conflicts not started by but participated in by the superpowers ? 1950 - 1980: The period between the stabilisation of the Cold War in Europe after the Berlin Blockade and the emergence of d�tente between the superpowers Thesis * Important to note that globalised conflicts may have Cold War connotations to them, involving allies or interests of the superpowers - thus the outcome of the conflict can affect the Cold War situation * However, while globalised conflicts may change the balance of power in the Cold War, more often than not superpowers did not enter into these conflicts with the explicit aim of doing so, or if they did, these intentions were superceded by other interests, especially the interests of local players * Also the degree with which superpowers used the Cold War experience in Europe to justify involvement in global conflicts changed over time, and between the superpowers * Thus while the Cold War in Europe may have made involvement in global conflicts more attractive, this was most of the time a secondary ...read more.

Middle

saw Korea as the first sign of Soviet expansionism outside of Europe, and sought to apply containment militarily to preempt the spread of Communism into Asia: "Aggression had to be stopped as early as possible. If not answered in Korea, it would only result in new [Soviet] advances in more central areas" (Lundestad) o Also, after China entered the war and pushed UN forces back out of North Korea, MacArthur proposed using nuclear weapons against China, but Truman dismissed him instead - this shows that even in the age of nuclear monopoly for the US, they were careful not to carry out too provocative moves that could have instigated the SU into an armed response in Europe or elsewhere o Thus in this case the US's behaviour in Korea was largely governed by the fresh memories of the European Cold War experience, and the determination not to allow a repeat to happen elsewhere Case 2: Middle-East Conflicts * The Arab-Israeli wars too, largely, disagree with the idea that the wars outside of Europe that the super powers were involved in were due to the Cold War. * In the Arab-Israeli wars, the background of the historical tension between the Israelis and other Arab states are omnipresent, and serve as an underlying factor in all the wars. This has nothing to do with the Cold War, or the super powers. * Looking into specifics, each Arab-Israeli war has its causes that are largely isolated from the Cold War, and though there may be aid from super powers, the origins and sustaining factors of the war are generally local. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, the US delay of aid was explained in two ways: o The Americans were afraid to offend the Arabs, and further minimize any influence the USA might have on the region, since they were also trying to gain 3rd World support and access to Mid East oil o Sadat had sent the US a message not to act on Israel's behalf too hastily as Sadat guaranteed that the assault was a limited operation, aimed at forcing Israel to return land won in 1967, which would be followed by a peace agreement. o Hence, it's seen that Egypt which had received military aid from the USSR, and has been traditionally backed by the USSR, had a fairly strong influence over the US. This blurring of side-taking was not a characteristic of the Cold War at all, and indicated the capability of the local players to manipulate the super powers to their own agenda. While the role of the US was larger and more important than in the previous Arab-Israeli wars, of almost negligible intervention, it is still clear that all along the scene is set by the local powers, and the war carried out entirely for their own purposes. In a way, the USSR and US are trying to hitch a ride, perhaps attempting to use the war to establish some form of dominance over the Arab states, which were crucial for their supply of oil, and their competition is linked to the Cold War. However, they did not succeed in "fighting [the war]", the USSR being relegated to military aid supplier, and the USA as saviour, but neither the initiator nor in control of the war, nor gaining any form of Cold War victory. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did North Korea invade South Korea in June 1950, and why did USA ...

    Stalin had four reasons. The Communist Bloc was bigger in East Asia. Second, Russia exploded an atomic bomb. Diplomacy was failing for the West. An fourth, there was a perceived weakening of Washington's resolve to fight a war over Korea.

  2. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    American attitudes toward the seemed encapsulated in the comments of one minister who called for the removal of communists in "ships of stone with sails of lead, with the wrath of God for a breeze and with hell for their first port."

  1. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    But the tanks were too few in number, only eighteen altogether, and they broke down all too easily on the muddy battlefield. Much more successful was the use of tanks at Cambrai on 20 November 1917. 380 tanks broke completely through the German lines, but the troops were unable to follow this up.

  2. How far was the USSR responsible for the outbreak of the Cold War?

    The aggressive policy Stalin adopted in Yugoslavia's case also gave the Americans reasons to be suspicious of Soviet reasons behind their take-over. Despite Yugoslavia embracing communism, the Soviets were dissatisfied with this as it was a form of "national communism", with Tito seeking to adopt his own communist line, independent of the USSR.

  1. WHAT WERE THE CAUSES OF THE YOM KIPPUR WAR OF 1973?

    The Egyptians were backed by the Syrians and the Jordanians but still managed to lose the war against Israel (History of Israel). However, these causes were only long term causes of the cause of the Yom Kippur war, the short term cause was the war of attrition.

  2. The Origins of the Cold War.

    Others events included the Strategic Defense Initiative and Solidarity. This section is a stub. You can help by adding to it. [edit] End of the Cold War Changes in borders in Europe and Central Asia with the end of the Cold War 23 new countries were formed.

  1. The Arab-Israeli conflict 1956, 1967 and 1973.

    therefore it is less significant to the part the USSR played in the wars. Arab nationalism wasn't as important as the other factors because this was just the unity of the Arab nations, acting like one, even though it existed throughout all 3 wars.

  2. What part did Ronald Reagan play in bringing the Cold War to an end?

    He also felt that if the economy was to move forward then the public would have to be allowed greater freedom and there would be more political openness and this was known as his Glasnost policy.23 In order to carry out his internal reforms Gorbachev needed to change the external environment that was the main cause for the economic problems.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work