• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The Cold War in Europe brought the big powers into fighting wars outside Europe between 1950 and 1980." Discuss.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"The Cold War in Europe brought the big powers into fighting wars outside Europe between 1950 and 1980." Discuss. ? Cold War in Europe: Hostile diplomatic relations and military buildup between the US and the USSR and their respective allies in the European theatre ? Big Powers: US and USSR, for simplicity - though France and Britain do have certain dealings abroad in the period described that had to do with the Cold War, but these were only marginal and not as significant as US and USSR's actions ? Wars outside Europe: Armed conflicts taking place outside the European theatre, including also conflicts not started by but participated in by the superpowers ? 1950 - 1980: The period between the stabilisation of the Cold War in Europe after the Berlin Blockade and the emergence of d�tente between the superpowers Thesis * Important to note that globalised conflicts may have Cold War connotations to them, involving allies or interests of the superpowers - thus the outcome of the conflict can affect the Cold War situation * However, while globalised conflicts may change the balance of power in the Cold War, more often than not superpowers did not enter into these conflicts with the explicit aim of doing so, or if they did, these intentions were superceded by other interests, especially the interests of local players * Also the degree with which superpowers used the Cold War experience in Europe to justify involvement in global conflicts changed over time, and between the superpowers * Thus while the Cold War in Europe may have made involvement in global conflicts more attractive, this was most of the time a secondary ...read more.

Middle

saw Korea as the first sign of Soviet expansionism outside of Europe, and sought to apply containment militarily to preempt the spread of Communism into Asia: "Aggression had to be stopped as early as possible. If not answered in Korea, it would only result in new [Soviet] advances in more central areas" (Lundestad) o Also, after China entered the war and pushed UN forces back out of North Korea, MacArthur proposed using nuclear weapons against China, but Truman dismissed him instead - this shows that even in the age of nuclear monopoly for the US, they were careful not to carry out too provocative moves that could have instigated the SU into an armed response in Europe or elsewhere o Thus in this case the US's behaviour in Korea was largely governed by the fresh memories of the European Cold War experience, and the determination not to allow a repeat to happen elsewhere Case 2: Middle-East Conflicts * The Arab-Israeli wars too, largely, disagree with the idea that the wars outside of Europe that the super powers were involved in were due to the Cold War. * In the Arab-Israeli wars, the background of the historical tension between the Israelis and other Arab states are omnipresent, and serve as an underlying factor in all the wars. This has nothing to do with the Cold War, or the super powers. * Looking into specifics, each Arab-Israeli war has its causes that are largely isolated from the Cold War, and though there may be aid from super powers, the origins and sustaining factors of the war are generally local. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, the US delay of aid was explained in two ways: o The Americans were afraid to offend the Arabs, and further minimize any influence the USA might have on the region, since they were also trying to gain 3rd World support and access to Mid East oil o Sadat had sent the US a message not to act on Israel's behalf too hastily as Sadat guaranteed that the assault was a limited operation, aimed at forcing Israel to return land won in 1967, which would be followed by a peace agreement. o Hence, it's seen that Egypt which had received military aid from the USSR, and has been traditionally backed by the USSR, had a fairly strong influence over the US. This blurring of side-taking was not a characteristic of the Cold War at all, and indicated the capability of the local players to manipulate the super powers to their own agenda. While the role of the US was larger and more important than in the previous Arab-Israeli wars, of almost negligible intervention, it is still clear that all along the scene is set by the local powers, and the war carried out entirely for their own purposes. In a way, the USSR and US are trying to hitch a ride, perhaps attempting to use the war to establish some form of dominance over the Arab states, which were crucial for their supply of oil, and their competition is linked to the Cold War. However, they did not succeed in "fighting [the war]", the USSR being relegated to military aid supplier, and the USA as saviour, but neither the initiator nor in control of the war, nor gaining any form of Cold War victory. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did North Korea invade South Korea in June 1950, and why did USA ...

    In the Second World War, the allies needed America's help to win the war. Therefore they got the title of "World Policemen". The lessons learnt from the 1930's were that appeasement did not work as proven in the Second World War.

  2. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    9,000 Allied soldiers were killed. Early respirators were clumsy and only fitted into the shirt collar. Later designs proved very effective. * Gas was terrifying, but did not prove to be a decisive weapon. It could blow the wrong way and attackers had to wear respirators, which hindered visibility and movement.

  1. How far was the USSR responsible for the outbreak of the Cold War?

    This was a clear violation of the Declaration of Liberated Europe and so Western leaders thus saw the development in Eastern Europe as a first step towards taking control of the countries in the West, hence pushing the US towards taking active steps to prevent such a movement.

  2. How True is it to say that the period 1953-1962 saw a relaxation of ...

    In addition to this, there were other signs that a relaxation of the Cold War was occuring. In 1955, the Russians agreed to give up all of their military bases in Finland and Cominform was abandoned in April 1956. There were also shifts in American foreign policy.

  1. The Origins of the Cold War.

    Eventually they aligned themselves with Ronald Reagan and the conservative wing of the Republicans, who promised to confront charges of Soviet expansionism. The election, firstly of Margaret Thatcher as UK Prime Minister in 1979, followed by that of Ronald Reagan to the American Presidency in 1981, saw the elevation of

  2. To what extent was Soviet expansion responsible for the outbreak of the Cold War ...

    Communists also looked forward to a worldwide revolution, which would bring communist government to power everywhere. These communist ideas came into conflict with beliefs held by many Americans and Western Europeans. The United States representing the democratic West, believed in free elections and government according to the wishes of the majority.

  1. A Study of Air Supremacy in the Korean War.

    When these two forces linked up beyond the Pusan perimeter the North Koreans were outmaneuvered and in full retreat.15 Meanwhile Combat Cargo Command expanded its operations by delivering supplies to Wonsan, North Korea, where friendly Republic of Korea troops had captured.

  2. ‘In origins andoutcome, the Spanish Civil War was a Spanish and not a European ...

    Neutrality would avoid antagonising Hitler and Mussolini. Believed that Franco would win anyway. Did not want to make him an enemy. Gibraltar would be vulnerable. British economic and business interests: Spain was Britain's largest arms importer. Big companies such as ICI invested in Spain.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work