• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The Cold War in Europe brought the big powers into fighting wars outside Europe between 1950 and 1980." Discuss.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"The Cold War in Europe brought the big powers into fighting wars outside Europe between 1950 and 1980." Discuss. ? Cold War in Europe: Hostile diplomatic relations and military buildup between the US and the USSR and their respective allies in the European theatre ? Big Powers: US and USSR, for simplicity - though France and Britain do have certain dealings abroad in the period described that had to do with the Cold War, but these were only marginal and not as significant as US and USSR's actions ? Wars outside Europe: Armed conflicts taking place outside the European theatre, including also conflicts not started by but participated in by the superpowers ? 1950 - 1980: The period between the stabilisation of the Cold War in Europe after the Berlin Blockade and the emergence of d�tente between the superpowers Thesis * Important to note that globalised conflicts may have Cold War connotations to them, involving allies or interests of the superpowers - thus the outcome of the conflict can affect the Cold War situation * However, while globalised conflicts may change the balance of power in the Cold War, more often than not superpowers did not enter into these conflicts with the explicit aim of doing so, or if they did, these intentions were superceded by other interests, especially the interests of local players * Also the degree with which superpowers used the Cold War experience in Europe to justify involvement in global conflicts changed over time, and between the superpowers * Thus while the Cold War in Europe may have made involvement in global conflicts more attractive, this was most of the time a secondary ...read more.

Middle

saw Korea as the first sign of Soviet expansionism outside of Europe, and sought to apply containment militarily to preempt the spread of Communism into Asia: "Aggression had to be stopped as early as possible. If not answered in Korea, it would only result in new [Soviet] advances in more central areas" (Lundestad) o Also, after China entered the war and pushed UN forces back out of North Korea, MacArthur proposed using nuclear weapons against China, but Truman dismissed him instead - this shows that even in the age of nuclear monopoly for the US, they were careful not to carry out too provocative moves that could have instigated the SU into an armed response in Europe or elsewhere o Thus in this case the US's behaviour in Korea was largely governed by the fresh memories of the European Cold War experience, and the determination not to allow a repeat to happen elsewhere Case 2: Middle-East Conflicts * The Arab-Israeli wars too, largely, disagree with the idea that the wars outside of Europe that the super powers were involved in were due to the Cold War. * In the Arab-Israeli wars, the background of the historical tension between the Israelis and other Arab states are omnipresent, and serve as an underlying factor in all the wars. This has nothing to do with the Cold War, or the super powers. * Looking into specifics, each Arab-Israeli war has its causes that are largely isolated from the Cold War, and though there may be aid from super powers, the origins and sustaining factors of the war are generally local. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, the US delay of aid was explained in two ways: o The Americans were afraid to offend the Arabs, and further minimize any influence the USA might have on the region, since they were also trying to gain 3rd World support and access to Mid East oil o Sadat had sent the US a message not to act on Israel's behalf too hastily as Sadat guaranteed that the assault was a limited operation, aimed at forcing Israel to return land won in 1967, which would be followed by a peace agreement. o Hence, it's seen that Egypt which had received military aid from the USSR, and has been traditionally backed by the USSR, had a fairly strong influence over the US. This blurring of side-taking was not a characteristic of the Cold War at all, and indicated the capability of the local players to manipulate the super powers to their own agenda. While the role of the US was larger and more important than in the previous Arab-Israeli wars, of almost negligible intervention, it is still clear that all along the scene is set by the local powers, and the war carried out entirely for their own purposes. In a way, the USSR and US are trying to hitch a ride, perhaps attempting to use the war to establish some form of dominance over the Arab states, which were crucial for their supply of oil, and their competition is linked to the Cold War. However, they did not succeed in "fighting [the war]", the USSR being relegated to military aid supplier, and the USA as saviour, but neither the initiator nor in control of the war, nor gaining any form of Cold War victory. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent do you accept the view that the USA and the USSR ...

    4 star(s)

    The USSR felt vulnerable because it had been invaded through Eastern Europe twice. Moreover it distrusted the west rightly so as the west had intervened in the Russian civil war of 1917 to prevent communism being established in the USSR.

  2. Why did North Korea invade South Korea in June 1950, and why did USA ...

    In the Second World War, the allies needed America's help to win the war. Therefore they got the title of "World Policemen". The lessons learnt from the 1930's were that appeasement did not work as proven in the Second World War.

  1. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    Verdun * In February 1916 the Germans attacked Verdun in eastern France. Their plan was to 'bleed France dry'. They knew that the French would defend Verdun and believed that they would send more and more reinforcements into the city and its forts. * The battle dragged on until December.

  2. How far was the USSR responsible for the outbreak of the Cold War?

    The aggressive policy Stalin adopted in Yugoslavia's case also gave the Americans reasons to be suspicious of Soviet reasons behind their take-over. Despite Yugoslavia embracing communism, the Soviets were dissatisfied with this as it was a form of "national communism", with Tito seeking to adopt his own communist line, independent of the USSR.

  1. Who was responsible for the start of the Cold war?

    As a result hostility between the two countries rose to an all new level, even to the extent where ordinary Americans were told to look for 'Red's under the bed,' a reference to communist spies. There is definitely a strong case for arguing that the dawn of Russian nuclear capability marked the beginning of the 'Cold war.'

  2. The Origins of the Cold War.

    The period between the rise of Mikhail Gorbachev as Soviet leader in 1985 to the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. Events included the Chernobyl accident in 1986, glasnost and perestroika in the Soviet Union, the Autumn of Nations (which includes the famous fall of the Berlin Wall in

  1. The Cold War was a big rivalry that developed after World War II.

    launched the first artificial earth satellite, Sputnik 1. In January 1958, the United States launched its first earth satellite. Soviet rocket power was more advanced, but the two powers had clearly established a nuclear "balance of terror." The U.S.S.R. stopped testing nuclear weapons in March 1958, and the United States halted its tests in October.

  2. The Arab-Israeli conflict 1956, 1967 and 1973.

    therefore it is less significant to the part the USSR played in the wars. Arab nationalism wasn't as important as the other factors because this was just the unity of the Arab nations, acting like one, even though it existed throughout all 3 wars.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work