• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'The most important factor in Stalin's rise to power was his personality.' Discuss this view.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

`'The most important factor in Stalin's rise to power was his personality.' Discuss this view. Many argue that the rise of Joseph Stalin as the ultimate leader of the Bolshevik party which was holding the power in the Soviet Union after the death of the revolutionary leader Lenin in 1924 was mainly due to the personality which Stalin had. There are many factors, which are linked together to develop this argument. However, there are other factors as well which can be seen as leading to the rise of Stalin as the leader of the Bolshevik Party. Historians like Conquest and Tucker have argued that Stalin's personality cult was extremely significant in his rise to power. They have described him as tough and ruthless and a person who was determined to secure his power base within the party. They have also said that although he was not exceptionally bright he was very cunning. Trotsky, one of his chief competitors in the run to power has argued in the same way and claimed that the reason he missed Lenin's funeral was due to wrong information given to him by Stalin. ...read more.

Middle

Many modern western historians have argued that the ideologies that Stalin stood for i.e., Socialism in one country and dictatorship of the proletariat appealed to more soviets than permanent revolution, which was the alternative ideological perspective. Stalin also managed to strengthen his position greatly when he stared the cult of Lenin and many soviets felt that it gave them a historical role. It is however not true that Stalin's opponents did not have a clear line of policy at all. It was just that Stalin was clever and strong witted enough to thwart their influence within the party. Trotsky, Kamenev and Zinoviev stood from the start for extreme socialism but Stalin argued justifiably that the peasantry was not yet ready for collectivisation. He supported Lenin's temporary NEP. In the late 1920s, however, he decided to go in for full-fledged collectivisation and industrialisation thus showing that although he was prepared to compromise when the need arose he was dedicated to communism from the bottom of his heart and this led to a strong support base for him in the party. ...read more.

Conclusion

Stalin's rise to power was also hastened by the fact that his most important rival Trotsky did make some fundamental mistakes to count himself out of contention and the other competitors never really posed a serious threat to Stalin. Trotsky missed the two golden opportunities he had to undermine Stalin. He refused Lenin's offer to become the deputy chairman of the Sovnarkom. He also did not speak in the place of Lenin at the XII Party Congress in 1923 where he could have humiliated Stalin. Stalin, as it has been argued, was also lucky to a certain extent for example, when illness prevented Trotsky from attending party meetings from 1923 to 1924. Thus we see that there were various factors linked together in the rise of Stalin as the leader of the Bolshevik party as a successor of Lenin. It cannot be said that it was only personality that led to the rise of Stalin. Indeed, his unique, strong and varied personality did help him in a number of ways, yet without the other factors in play it was hard to see him as the leader of the Bolsheviks. Aruni Mukherjee - 1 - ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How did Joseph Stalin rise to power?

    The consequence of the triumvirate was that Trotsky's reputation was damaged which increased Stalin's chances of success in taking hold of Russia. Also, it meant that Stalin eliminated two party colleagues who could have taken control of the party, which again increased his chances of taking power of Russia.

  2. Mussolini(TM)s rise to power up to 1922 owes more to the failures of others ...

    The Pact of Pacification between the Fascists and Socialist Unions was rejected by several of the ras and there were calls for Mussolini to be removed from leadership and for him to be replaced by D'Annunzio who refused to act.

  1. History - Mussolini's Rise to Power

    The government's passive attitude towards both the war and extremism contributed to mass discontent and, reciprocally, an opportunist attitude among the Fascists, sparking from the growing realisation of their inability to handle these situations. The third most substantial group with the potential to oppose the Fascists consisted of the millions of Italian Catholics across the country, especially in the south.

  2. Explain how other factors helped Stalin in his Rise to Power.

    The post of Commissar for Nationalities gave Stalin little power, but it was the first step in his rise up through the ranks. Lenin remained impressed by Stalin's work and continued to promote him further. By 1919 he was the Liaison officer between the Politburo and Orgburo, allowing him to monitor both party policy and party personnel.

  1. What was the most important reason that Stalin rose to power?

    term it would not have made much difference to his political standings. In fact Lenin did have a grudge against Stalin because he didn't like the way he had treated the National Representative of Georgia. Another important event is when in 1925 Trotsky was sacked as War Commissar.

  2. "The Personality Of Mussolini Was The Main Factor In His Rise To Power"

    This led to a lack of belief in the government by the population. Italy is a country that produces little raw materials, because little steel or coal was produced, Italy could not produce products to sell and lost money. Even though Mussolini had an assertive, ambitious personality which aided him

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work